Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Double Airbridges on Smaller Airliners

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Double Airbridges on Smaller Airliners

    I saw in Airliner World that Westjet uses double airbridges on its 737s at YVR. Are there any other airlines/airports that use double airbridges on their narrowbody aircraft?
    Fly Raleigh-Durham International, with direct flights on Air Canada, AirTran, American Airlines, American Eagle, America West, Continental Airlines, Continental Express, Delta Airlines, Delta Connection, jetBlue, Northwest Airlines, Southwest Airlines, United Express and US Airways to:

    ATL, AUS, BWI, BOS, CHS, CLT, MDW, ORD, CVG, CLE, DFW, DTW, FLL, BDL, HOU, IND, LAS, LAX, LGW, MEM, MIA, MSP, BNA, EWR, MSY, JFK, LGA, ORF, MCO, PHL, PHX, PIT, STL, SLC, TPA, YYZ, DCA and IAD.

  • #2
    I've seen WN use the double jetway at DAL. It's pretty cool to watch. I have a few pictures of it from 2001 I think. Not great quality, though. Don't know if they still have them around.

    Comment


    • #3
      Yeah!!! Here in Albany we have 2 jetways with double bridges....Both are Southwest Airlines.Supposedly they were installed to see how they perform in inclimate weather..... Pretty cool!!!! The most common question about them is when theres no planes at the gate, and they are about 40 feet up in the air.... People say ..." Good God.... What parks there????"... always good for a laugh.... Ill have to keep this thread in mind when I go to work tomorrow, and get a few pics of them in action/rest.....
      -Jay

      Comment


      • #4
        finally got a picture... only a few months late.

        A rather diffrent view of a southwest aircraft. The dual jet bridges in Albany were installed to check thier functionality in inclimate weather. Only a few other places in the U.S. have dual jet bridges like these.. N354SW. Boeing 737-3H4. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by JJR
          finally got a picture... only a few months late.

          http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=476376

          Wow that thing looks like it barely clears the wing, I bet it couldn't get over a 73G with winglets right?
          Follow me on Twitter! www.twitter.com/flyingphotog

          Comment


          • #6
            seems like a waste of money to me

            Comment


            • #7
              Some times I have seen the widebody double jetways used on 757s
              Wu Tang Clan: best rap group of all time


              Save hip-hop, bring talent and intelligence back into it

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by PT737SWA
                Wow that thing looks like it barely clears the wing, I bet it couldn't get over a 73G with winglets right?
                They go up, and they don't go to the side completely (at least if they work the same as here in AMS), so they don't have to clear the winglet.

                Originally posted by chrisburns
                seems like a waste of money to me
                why? this speeds up boarding/deplaning, thus wasting less time on the ground, thus more flights (basically), thus more income. Seems like something great to me.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Not anything really new. I recall seeing a pic of a satellite UA had at SFO in the early 60s that was designed to accept about five DC8s with front and rear airbridges.
                  ________
                  HERBAL VAPORIZERS

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by a78jumper
                    Not anything really new. I recall seeing a pic of a satellite UA had at SFO in the early 60s that was designed to accept about five DC8s with front and rear airbridges.
                    I remember that pic (Airways, sometime around 2002/2003). The difference, the jetways back then didn't go over the wings.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by a78jumper
                      Not anything really new. I recall seeing a pic of a satellite UA had at SFO in the early 60s that was designed to accept about five DC8s with front and rear airbridges.
                      Wasn't TWA's terminal at JFK similar to that, where there was a jetway that went to the front boarding door & another to the rear?

                      DeltaRules


                      http://www.flightlevel350.com/aviati...r=Josh+Sprague

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by herpa2003
                        I saw in Airliner World that Westjet uses double airbridges on its 737s at YVR. Are there any other airlines/airports that use double airbridges on their narrowbody aircraft?
                        I've actually deplaned from a WJ 737-200 using a double-bridge at YVR. I was on a thru flight from YXS-YYC and took some time to stretch my legs.. however the plane was cleaned and then boarded very quickly and we were off to YYC... it's very efficient.

                        Trust me... I deplaned off of a full 757 from the back row... double-bridges need to be used way more often!!
                        My Jetphotos.net Images

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Spotter
                          They go up, and they don't go to the side completely (at least if they work the same as here in AMS), so they don't have to clear the winglet.


                          why? this speeds up boarding/deplaning, thus wasting less time on the ground, thus more flights (basically), thus more income. Seems like something great to me.

                          On a small aircraft its not going to make that much of a difference, it may actually take just as long if not longer, those over wing jetways move slow to prevent accidents.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            [QUOTE=Spotter]They go up, and they don't go to the side completely (at least if they work the same as here in AMS), so they don't have to clear the winglet.


                            why? this speeds up boarding/deplaning, thus wasting less time on the ground, thus more flights (basically), thus more income. Seems like something great to me.[/QUOTE

                            Yes, it goes way up in the air to clear the winglets, and comes down on the wing. The major reason of having these is quick turns, but quite honestly, the turns arent going to get much quicker...... Putting almost 2000 gallons of gas on, and doing the paperwork, uses about all the 20 minutes for a turn we have now.... One of the Jackasses I work with took A 4 minute fuel delay the other day. I think its our 1st since last summer.
                            -Jay

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by herpa2003
                              I saw in Airliner World that Westjet uses double airbridges on its 737s at YVR. Are there any other airlines/airports that use double airbridges on their narrowbody aircraft?
                              They use them in Calgary as well. I don't think I've ever actually seen it in use there though. They do have signs up around Concourse D pointing them out though.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X