Tweet
Originally posted by BoeingBobby
View Post
-
Actually, not quite sure where your sense of humor just went.
-
Hey, that was a touch of humor. Not a kind word, but some humor, somehow... maybe.Originally posted by BoeingBobby View Post
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---Comment
-
Not as funny as 'mouse in cockpit' 'installed cat', but I'll be keeping my day job.Originally posted by Gabriel View PostComment
-
interesting and maybe worrying that 15 days after they downloaded the CVR there's been no wordComment
-
-
Yeah, not really an update about the accident itself.Originally posted by Highkeas View Post
Boeing identified a potential failure mode that could potentially lead to thrust asymmetry and issued a multi-operator memo that the FAA made it into an AD. But it seems that this failure mode is most likely NOT what caused the thrust asymmetry in this accident.
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---Comment
-
No updates related to the CVR readout, which is telling...Comment
-
what do y'all think is going on here? i can understand indonesia burying the truth but aren't others involved in and have access to the records? is there some rule that prevents the others, such as boeing or the manufacturer of the cvr from disclosing the info?Comment
-
The investigation is still open. The parties participating in the investigation cannot release information until the final report is issued. The only one that can release information in the meantime is the investigating agency.Originally posted by TeeVee View Post
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---Comment
-
-
ICAO Annex 13, if I am not mistakenOriginally posted by TeeVee View Post
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---Comment
-
ICAO Annex 13, #5.26:Originally posted by Gabriel View Post
Accredited representatives and their advisers:
a) Shall provide the State conducting the investigation with all the relevant information available to them, and
b) Shall not divulge information on the progress and findings of the investigation without the express consent of the State conducting the investigation.
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---Comment
-
good recipe for a cover-up. which a-holes dream this stuff up?Comment
-
The idea is to centralize the investigation and information in one agency, with the rest of the involved parties collaborating with that agency.Originally posted by TeeVee View Post
Cover-ups can always occur, of course. But I don't see a recipe for cover up in this particular prescription. Other than their participation in the investigation, the parties receive the draft of the report and they can comment on it and the investigation agency has to reply to each of them before or at the moment of releasing the final report. Many times changes are incorporated in the final report as a result of these comments. After the final report is officially released, the parties are not bound anymore to not divulge information (because there is no party conducting the investigation anymore to whom to ask for consent). It was often the case that parties expressed their disagreement, and at times published their own independent final report.
But the cover up can happen because the investigating agency doesn't need to share the information with other parties nor to open the docket to other parties or the public once the investigation is over. Not by Annex 13 at least. Local laws my differ.
That said, the NTSB itself usually doesn't open the docket and doesn't release the flight recorders transcripts until the investigation is almost over. So....
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---Comment
Comment