Originally posted by BoeingBobby
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hawaiian A332 teaches dozens of pax a painful lesson about personal freedom
Collapse
X
-
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
-
Originally posted by BoeingBobby View PostAnd you wonder why I hardly ever did pax flights at Atlas? Let's see, boxes don't bitch, boxes don't get drunk, boxes don't need to be fed, boxes don't walk around. You want me to continue?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gabriel View Post
Is it really not against the law, though? Not sure if directly in a law or in a CFR, but I assume that not complying with a CFR is against the law.
Complying with crew instructions and posted signs is REQUIRED. So if there is a sign posted in every seat saying "fasten seatbelt while seated" and you do not comply, it has to be some kind of violation, which I assume is punishable. If the captain turns on the sign and a recording says "The captain has turned the seat belt sign on, return to your seat and fasten your seatbelt" and you do not do so, it has to be some kind of violation which I assume is punishable. These are not violations against company policy. They are violations against either a law or a code of federal regulations.
Whether it is enforced with any consistency or not is a different question.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gabriel View Post
I doubt that a pilot would turn on the sign and say that you may go to the restroom. Even if in case of need they let you do it, I don't think that they would say so in advance.[/LIST]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gabriel View Post
Complying with crew instructions and posted signs is REQUIRED. So if there is a sign posted in every seat saying "fasten seatbelt while seated" and you do not comply, it has to be some kind of violation, which I assume is punishable.
Comment
Comment