Hannah Montana targeted in aircraft hijack plot

[Optimus Prime]

Unfricken believable!! I must find out more about this... I am quite surprised that it is not getting that much coverage on the news (imagine if his name was Mohammad!!)

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/25/flight.incident/

[Half Bottle]

Unfricken believable!! I must find out more about this... I am quite surprised that it is not getting that much coverage on the news (imagine if his name was Mohammad!!)

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/25/flight.incident/

I think even if his name were Mohammad it wouldn't get too much more attention because, 1) he was acting alone; 2) he was a teenager and, 3) his plan to overpower the cockpit crew with rope and while acting alone seems rather ill-conceived.

But, though his actions were reprehensible, his apparent anger against Hannah Montana is understood, at least by this father of Disney Channel couch potatoes.

[Foxtrot]

Re:

I think even if his name were Mohammad it wouldn't get too much more attention because, 1) he was acting alone; 2) he was a teenager and, 3) his plan to overpower the cockpit crew with rope and while acting alone seems rather ill-conceived.

But, though his actions were reprehensible, his apparent anger against Hannah Montana is understood, at least by this father of Disney Channel couch potatoes.

Hannah Montana's concert's have been described as kid-freindly and apparently they're one of the few concerts parents everywhere don't have reservations about while taking their kids to see them. Am I missing something?

[Half Bottle]

Hannah Montana's concert's have been described as kid-freindly and apparently they're one of the few concerts parents everywhere don't have reservations about while taking their kids to see them. Am I missing something?

Yeah, it's wholesome entertainment. I just find her incredibly grating on my ears.

[tds]

I think even if his name were Mohammad it wouldn't get too much more attention because... 2) he was a teenager...

You've picked a funny place to go implying that teenagers are inconsequential, Half Bottle.

[Dmmoore]

Unfricken believable!! I must find out more about this... I am quite surprised that it is not getting that much coverage on the news (imagine if his name was Mohammad!!)

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/25/flight.incident/

I agree with Halfie on this one. Name makes no difference when a minor is involved.

[JordanD]

How'd this dumbshit plan to overtake an entire flight crew, PLUS a cabin full of people with tape, handcuffs, and YARN?

[ATrude777]

Already posted this folks.

http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=42217

Alex

[Half Bottle]

Already posted this folks.

http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=42217

Alex

This will teach you the fine art of thread titling.

[ATrude777]

This will teach you the fine art of thread titling.

Which is what?

I posted a fact, he was wrong. Hannah Montana was never intended to be a target. So why put something in the title that was false?

Alex

[Half Bottle]

Which is what?

I posted a fact, he was wrong. Hannah Montana was never intended to be a target. So why put something in the title that was false?

Alex

Well, it should be obvious: to get more interest in your thread. Facts schmacts.

[ATrude777]

Well, it should be obvious: to get more interest in your thread. Facts schmacts.

Didn't know we were competing for thread views now.

Alex

[Half Bottle]

Didn't know we were competing for thread views now.

Alex

I'm not. But I thought you might be since you took the time to point out that you had already posted a thread on the topic.

[ATrude777]

I'm not. But I thought you might be since you took the time to point out that you had already posted a thread on the topic.

No, I did it so we don't have double topics going. Before ad came over, jp seemed to be admant about having two threads going at once.

But perhaps they aren't anymore.

Alex

[Half Bottle]

No, I did it so we don't have double topics going. Before ad came over, jp seemed to be admant about having two threads going at once.

But perhaps they aren't anymore.

Alex

I would agree with the goal of maintaining only a single thread. But since it happened, if you were the mod, which would you keep? The one with two replies or the one with 10?

If what you had truly cared about was only having one thread you would have written, "I already posted a thread about this, but since OP's thread is getting more interest, could the mods lock or delete mine? Thanks."

What you actually did showed that you were playing a game of "mine's bigger." Which is cool. Just man-up and admit it.