Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Small plane, helicopter collide over Hudson River
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by z740 View Post
Eurocopter AS3350 and Piper PA32 are reported mishap aircraft.-Not an Airbus or Boeing guy here.
-20 year veteran on the USN Lockheed P-3 Orion.
-
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local...-52790622.html
The helicopter was from Liberty Tours, which conducts tours of NYC and the harbor, carrying the pilot and five passengers The aircraft was a PA-32R, registered in the Philadelphia area. Reports are it stopped at TEB to pick up another passenger. Reports are one dead.KC-135: Passing gas and taking names!
Comment
-
Notes from Mayor Bloomberg's press conference at approx 3PM EST:
*Aircraft believed to have a Pilot, and 2 pax, one being a child.
*Helo believed to have a Pilot and 5 pax(Italian)
*2 bodies recovered.
*They have found one wreckage and assume its the helo. There are bodies within this.
*Helo took off from west 30th street Heliport.
*Appears aircraft hit helo from aft and side from witness reports.
*Into a Recovery mode vice Rescue.
*No indication of any type of aircraft malfunctions.
*About 2 foot visibility underwater.
-Not an Airbus or Boeing guy here.
-20 year veteran on the USN Lockheed P-3 Orion.
Comment
-
It seems to be this helicopter from Liberty.. http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...6577094&nseq=1
Comment
-
That corridor is WAY too crowded. In the last five years it has gotten completely out of control thanks to emperor Bloomberg and his vision of NYC as a playground for rich euros. The Hudson is like a helicopter freeway. I've often sat out on the pier and wondered when (not if) something like this would happen.
I met a young helo pilot at a party a couple years back. He was flying AS150's for Liberty. He planned to get his multi-engine fixed-wing license and transition to corporate jets. His girlfriend was going to be his flight attendant. I hope he did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fear_of_FlyingHere we go again. Your MO is fairly predictable, Evan. Wait for a crash. As soon as it becomes reasonably safe to assume that some issue or other was involved - usually because it is widely reported by the media or simply because it is glaringly obvious - latch onto it and make it your own cause. Find a greedy corporation or a hapless government agency to blame. As soon as people start asking more probing questions, such as why the issue - seemingly so apparent - has been allowed to persist, rather than considering the complex underlying causes, the practical considerations, the inability of anyone to foresee all possible contingencies, etc. etc., you just keep pounding away that this should never have been allowed to happen, and that there is one quick and absolute fix to prevent it from ever happening again.
There is a lot of busy airspace in the U.S., and the ominous predictions of inevitable midair collisions have been around a long time. But by practicing good procedures, and learning from the crashes that have occurred along with the near misses, we seem to have kept the busiest of airports reasonably safe. The question here is what procedures were in place, how could this have happened on a perfectly sunny day, and then to learn from this, and improve the system. No one wants to see an aircraft to crash, ever.
Well, forget me. Lets see what an actual helo pilot flying the corridor has to say about it:
You have to be supremely vigilant in that corridor. It's summertime, and it's busy. You've got to have your head on a swivel, looking around," said Brian Alexander, a helicopter pilot and lawyer for the Manhattan aviation firm Kreindler and Kreindler.
Now read this:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/08092009...ies_183698.htm
Now go down to pier 19 and watch that heli-carnival for a bit yourself, and tell me what a reactionist I am. Maybe it's not dangerous if nothing goes wrong, but there's little room for the inevitable fact that something will. By the way, the Hudson river is not an airport. There's no ATC.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fear_of_FlyingActually, I have agreed with your point of view and defended your posts several times in the past. I don't necessarily disagree that there is an issue with volume of traffic here, either. It's just that I feel another crusade coming on. My point about busy airspace is that with good procedures, volume of traffic in and of itself has not inevitably proven disastrous, and my example was America's busiest airports, which despite dire predictions, have turned out to be reasonably safe.
Then there is unregulated capitalism at work. There's money to be made. More choppers mean more business. Supply must be increased to meet demand. In NYC, business does not regulate itself. I've watched over the years as the helo traffic has multiplied alongside the Bloomberg agenda. It has been allowed to overgrow the margin of safety.
So five Italian tourists had to die and now public opinion will force overdue regulations that will make this industry safer. Yes, I'm part of that 'crusade'; I admit it.
Comment
-
I tend to ignore most of the comments in rags like the NY Post or the Daily News and the sparkling analysis by the food vendor is worth it's weight in ...
However, they did have a comment by local pilot Robert Case and he mentions ...... "most beautiful scenery in the world" regarding the temporary flight ban after 9/11 and within that comment is probably the clue to incidents like the Cory Lidel crash over on the East River or the current one on the Hudson.
The ......... "Gee Whiz" factor is overwhelming to a pilot just passing through and the Empire State building, Chrysler and other skyscrapers...... or seeing the Statue of Liberty emerge from the grey summer haze .... the Piper pilot was (possibly), in that state of awe that that view will bring.
Note also, that the tour helo was grey and may have blended in with the summer haze and smog that are so common this time of year in that area so it didn't pop out like ....... bright white ..... or some other high visibility color may have.
Another ..... and I'll try not to fall off the "armchair" and hit too hard .... several news stories have reported that the pro pilots in the area announce when they are at/over a few key areas. Two of those were the Holland and Lincoln tunnels. That in itself is quite telling! A local or true pro who flies that sector every day would know what the the other pilot was calling out regarding location but, I mean, calling out a tunnel that runs under water .... holy cow ... it's not like the George Washington Bridge, the entry to those tunnels are blocks inland and are not what I would call "significant visual landmarks".
Regarding the Lidel incident ... I've always had a feeling that he was pointing out Yankee Stadium to his instructor (or trying to find it) ... and that factored into his lack of awareness of location and drift.
Before you "diss" my simple guesswork, didn't Langewiesche in his intro to "Stick And Rudder" make some reference when asked why he flew airplanes make some comment like ...... "To see" ...... admit it; we have all been taken in (distracted) by the view at some time or other?Live, from a grassy knoll somewhere near you.
Comment
-
Well said.
Originally posted by guamainiac View Post!A wanna be or true pro .-Not an Airbus or Boeing guy here.
-20 year veteran on the USN Lockheed P-3 Orion.
Comment
Comment