Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Malaysia Airlines Flight 124 Boeing 777 ADIRU incident

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by aardvark2zz View Post
    Well the "accuracy" of the uTube "thing" is based on the mute animation provided by the ATSB based on FDR data (just turn off volume).
    .
    OK, thanks , then it should be pretty good. I initially thought someone had used his own little flight simulator.

    Comment


    • #17
      That’s some scary stuff.

      Pardon my ignorance on this type of aircraft. The failure of auto brake mentioned in the report; is that wheel brake, or the air brake, or perhaps a combination?

      Thanks for posting the video at YouTube.

      Comment


      • #18
        Paging Gabriel.

        Are there implications of nose-up attitudes and low power?

        NO, they mean nothing becuase a plane can be stalled at any airspeed and attitude and power setting.

        Point up to go up...

        Turn on the FMS, couple to Autopilot.

        Don't touch anything else.
        Les règles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by ATFS_Crash View Post
          That’s some scary stuff.

          Pardon my ignorance on this type of aircraft. The failure of auto brake mentioned in the report; is that wheel brake, or the air brake, or perhaps a combination?

          Thanks for posting the video at YouTube.
          Automatic braking at landing. As autobrake uses deceleration infos from IRU, it will be inop when these units fail. No big thing.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by 3WE View Post
            Paging Gabriel.

            Are there implications of nose-up attitudes and low power?

            NO, they mean nothing becuase a plane can be stalled at any airspeed and attitude and power setting.

            Point up to go up...

            Turn on the FMS, couple to Autopilot.

            Don't touch anything else.
            And what are they supposed to do? Lower the nose? The plane would loose altitude for God sake!

            (There!)

            --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
            --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Gabriel View Post
              And what are they supposed to do? Lower the nose? The plane would lose altitude for God sake!

              (There!)
              Nose up, slow speed, low power, mushy feelings, nose blocking teh horizon, buffets, stall warnings, positive Gs.

              IF YOU SEE THESE SORTS OF THINGS ABSOLUTELY DO NOT EVER EVEN MOMENTARILY THINK, "Wow I wonder if I should lower the nose a little"

              Those thoughts belong to stupid parlor talking light plane pilots. Professionals know better.
              Les règles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by 3WE View Post
                Those thoughts belong to stupid parlor talking light plane pilots. Professionals know better.
                3WE, I feel we should include the disclaimer that we are joking (or making fun of certain breed of "professionals").

                Some "professionals" might take us seriously, follow our advice, hold the nose in a "stally" situation, and kill people (themselves included).

                Ok, not that they are not already doing it from time to time, even without our advice.
                - Let's four-one-oh it
                - Colgan
                - The iced 737 over the bridge
                - Several flapless take-offs, including but not restricted to the 2 MD-80s
                - The Turkish 737
                - You might want to include the AA DC-10 taking off from O'Hare
                - Austral DC-9, opposite case, low airspeed indication, the plane is at normal cruise attitude and power and constant cruise altitude -i.e. nowhere close to stall-, the crew however matches "low airspeed" with "stall" and apply full throttles, push nose down, and extend slats (still with a WRONG low airspeed indication, they were way overspeeding, bye-bye slats)
                - This Malaysia B777
                - Air france?

                --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
                --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

                Comment


                • #23
                  I love the fact that the auto-throttle kept turning on and idling the engines; because the Auto-throttle arm switch(es) were left on (and possibly some other reasons).

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Gabriel View Post
                    Ok, not that they are not already doing it from time to time, even without our advice.
                    - Let's four-one-oh it
                    - Colgan
                    - The iced 737 over the bridge
                    - Several flapless take-offs, including but not restricted to the 2 MD-80s
                    - The Turkish 737
                    - You might want to include the AA DC-10 taking off from O'Hare
                    - Austral DC-9, opposite case, low airspeed indication, the plane is at normal cruise attitude and power and constant cruise altitude -i.e. nowhere close to stall-, the crew however matches "low airspeed" with "stall" and apply full throttles, push nose down, and extend slats (still with a WRONG low airspeed indication, they were way overspeeding, bye-bye slats)
                    - This Malaysia B777
                    - Air france?
                    - Birgen Air B757
                    - [you never know how many Airbus crews unintentionally tested their alpha protection, more than commonly expected]

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by aardvark2zz View Post
                      I love the fact that the auto-throttle kept turning on and idling the engines; because the Auto-throttle arm switch(es) were left on (and possibly some other reasons).
                      Was a bit surprised that the Autothrottle is such a die-hard mechanism. Tries to stay connected. Reminds me a bit of the A300/310 autopilot system, which liked to stay connected even when the pilot grabbed the controls.

                      In today's Airbus any serious control input will immediately disconnect the A/P.

                      As I said: good pilots are trained to switch off ALL automation and take-over control whenever something looks strange. Never go half-automated in funny situations > HOTAS!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Schorsch View Post
                        HOTAS!
                        I thought at airbus the o is for OFF
                        ADCR
                        Tongue tied and twisted just an earth bound misfit

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by aardvark2zz View Post
                          I love the fact that the auto-throttle kept turning on and idling the engines; because the Auto-throttle arm switch(es) were left on (and possibly some other reasons).
                          If you know about how the Auto throttles work you would see the big HINT there.

                          Its in SPEED Mode, meaning the throttles control to MCP speed
                          The A/T is engaged meaning its controlling the throttles
                          the MCP Speed is .4 MACH, what speed is .4 mach at 40K.

                          They should have .82 mach selected.

                          looks to me like a crew got behind the airplane, they should have disconnect the A/T (and Looked at the MCP). Not sure what the heck they were doing.

                          Not having all the data, I cannot say further (and prolly might not anyway).

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            This plane flies very well, at least the aerodynamics.

                            If you look at the video starting at 1:20 and for 45 secs the plane stalls on and off and yet the roll and pitch is pretty stable -- minimal stick input is required; even with erratic computer output to some control surfaces.
                            .

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by aardvark2zz View Post
                              This plane flies very well, at least the aerodynamics.

                              If you look at the video starting at 1:20 and for 45 secs the plane stalls on and off and yet the roll and pitch is pretty stable -- minimal stick input is required; even with erratic computer output to some control surfaces.
                              .
                              With a gentle deceleration all transport aircraft have a nice stall behavior. It becomes worse when
                              - the stall is entered very quickly
                              - it is coupled with large control deflections, especially lateral
                              - for underwing engines, applying full power may worsen the situation as a large pitch-up moment develops.

                              The problem was avoidable and crew action worrying.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X