On the subject of hours experience in the right seat and/or the left seat......
How do you get 5,000 hrs experience ?
Well, you start at 1 hour and........
.........................
On the subject of actual hands on per flight, I’m manually flying it, it’s not on autopilot hours......
On take off = maybe 5 minutes as a maximum.
On landing = maybe 10 minutes ‘ish.
Bobby, am I about right there ?
Following on from that, an intercontinental pilot on a 12hr or more flight gets the figures above just once in their working day.
A short haul pilot flying two hour sectors 5 times a day gets the same experience x5
Just a thought !
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Breaking news: Ethiopian Airlines flight has crashed on way to Nairobi
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostOriginally Posted by NY Times
Former Max engineers, including one who worked on the sensors, said adding a third [AoA] sensor to the Max was a nonstarter. Previous 737s, they said, had used two and managers wanted to limit changes.
“They wanted to A, save money and B, to minimize the certification and flight-test costs,” said Mike Renzelmann, an engineer who worked on the Max’s flight controls. “Any changes are going to require recertification."
There is not too much wrong, either, with not adding a 3rd sensor and keeping 2 sensors like in the previous generations of the 737.
But there is a lot wrong on having 2 sensors and then using only 1 of them for a system where, if this single sensor malfunctioned for whatever reason, can simultaneously trigger IAS disagree, alt disagree, FD disagree, false stickshaker and nose-down runaway trim. For God's sake, you don't need a PhD in aeronautical engineering to note that this is wrong. I don't understand the logic behind not using the 2 sensors already installed in the airplane. Was the MCAS code going to be more expensive with inputs from 2 sensors? Was the testing and certification going to be more expensive? I think not, not in any meaningful way at least. And if there was any slight difference, here goes the saying:
Those who think that safety is expensive should try an accident.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostSmoking gun.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NY TimesFormer Max engineers, including one who worked on the sensors, said adding a third [AoA] sensor to the Max was a nonstarter. Previous 737s, they said, had used two and managers wanted to limit changes.
“They wanted to A, save money and B, to minimize the certification and flight-test costs,” said Mike Renzelmann, an engineer who worked on the Max’s flight controls. “Any changes are going to require recertification."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostSo this "muppet" is the CEO of Boyd Group International, who is a self-professed "well known as an expert in futurist aviation issues".
This is March 13th and he's confident that we will have the MAX back in the air in two weeks. Because the software fix is only for the 'brown people' from 'sh*thole nations' with low hours who "really shouldn't be in the cockpit"?
And, as of April 8th, is anybody still considering him a "well known as an expert in futurist aviation issues"?
Cuz he don't know jack about this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbOdm7u8mfU
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BoeingBobby View Posthttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/878631...struck-object/. Okay Evan, do we sue the bird, the foreign object or is this on Boeing too?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostBut you're not into gliding, yourself?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostWrong
"Would have saved" (May or may not be an official contributing factor)
You saying wrong...is wrong.
I also bet that those pilots started in single engine aircraft.
The question is why did they forget that relentless pull ups are bad...that checking the airspeed during approach is critical?
I see your inability to mentally process and conceive such things as possible insight into how they were thinking.
Do I KNOW what they were thinking, no, but I see your general answer is "They needed more type-specific training"...so they don't pull up relentlessly in a 737-Min-Lav-826A (with leather yoke and carbon fiber arm rests, as opposed to the 825A)...Ok...fine.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BoeingBobby View Posthttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/878631...struck-object/. Okay Evan, do we sue the bird, the foreign object or is this on Boeing too?
A failure of this single sensor triggers stick-shaker, IAS disagree, alt disagree, FD disagree, and nose-down trim runaway that, if the trim is disconnected as per procedure, may become impossible hard to move y hand and impossibly hard to keep the nose up with elevator.
Bird strike and FOD in general is reality in aviation an airplane design should be reasonable robust to it. This design is neither robust nor reasonable.
Could the pilots have done better? Hell, yes!!! But should Boeing have done better? Double hell yes!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 3WE View PostIt doesn't change the fact that:
Basic 172 training (relentless pull ups are bad) would have saved Air France
Advanced 172 training Pitch + Power = performance) would have saved Air France
Basic 172 training (always watch airspeed) would have saved Asiana
Basic 172 training (relentless pull ups are bad) would have saved 2, 3, 4, 5...(Additional Gabriel citations)
Basic 172 training (a large number of other basic things) would have saved a large number of airliners with crews with intensive procedural training- who for some reason, ignored basic, scientific things that applied to their airliners.
Wrong (stealth factors).
Wrong (type-specific knowledge/cockpit culture).
Wrong (human factors/stealth factors).
Wrong (wrong).
I bet you a German pilsner in a gold-rimmed glass that every one of these pilots learned the basics on a single engine carbo-prop without automation before they ever got into the messes that did them in.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostOh, sorry, you said right seat! I think he makes a good point. I think he knows what he's talking about.
But left seat, at least a few thousand hours please.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BoeingBobby View PostThe First Officer on the Ethiopian aircraft has been reported as having 350 hours Total Time.
But left seat, at least a few thousand hours please.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostDid he say that? I thought he said 3500 TT. I definitely agree with you if he said 350.
BTW: the epaulettes are part of his YouTube brand. I think he making some good second income here. He's got merch! Maybe you should consider this....
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: