Info wrong

[dlowwa]

Of course,
First one https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6489968
Second https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6490045
Third and last https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6490193
Thanks a lot for the attention!

Since you have already appealed, please check the email containing the result of your appeal. The screener left a message explaining why it is not considered hot.

[lourencogdias]

Of course,
First one https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6489968
Second https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6490045
Third and last https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6490193
Thanks a lot for the attention!

[TomEPKK]

Could you please post links to rejected pics? That would help a lot
Thanks!

[lourencogdias]

Hello there,
Today I had 3 photos rejected, all the same, as hot. The reasons for that were bad info, categories
missing/wrong and invalid hot in the last photo. Actually I want to know if possible which info is
wrong because I acn't find out (CASA C212-100 AVIOCAR 16507). And why is it an invalid hot if the
door have a different paint and the airplane have wings and tail again ( because the last photo it
hadn't). Thanks a lot for the attention, best regards.
Lourenço Dias