Mr.Bush is LOOSING YAHOO!!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mr.Bush loosing or winning??
Collapse
X
-
Great, another foreigner who thinks his opinion about the U.S. election actually means something.
In case you haven’t checked, Bush is doing just fine. He is well ahead of Kerry in the Electoral College, which is what really matters. Bush has a lock on all the states he won in 2000 with only Ohio and New Hampshire being troublesome but not a cause for serious concern. Kerry on the other hand is in danger of Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New Mexico, Oregon, and Michigan going for Bush. Also, due to changes from the 2000 census, the states Bush won in 2000 give him more electoral votes than they did in the last election. So Bush could lose New Hampshire and still win with 274 EV’s. Kerry on the other hand has to take a large state from Bush and not lose any others at the same time.
Comment
-
Bush is in fact not losing. The polls are within a point or 2 of each other, with a margin of error + or - 3 points. It's pretty much dead even. And like B757300 said it's the electoral voted that count. So we may have a replay of 2000 where Bush won, without winning the popular vote.
I don't think there will be a clear winner the morning after the election.
Comment
-
in some ways i want Bush to win even though, i'm a kerry supporter, because if things are out of control now, wait for another year or so, it's gonna be hell. And myself and all the other level headed people will go to the bush supporters "well... i told you so". In the debate Kerry looks like a president, Bush is just a little monkey faced blood thirsty child.
Comment
-
The only poll that matters in on election day...and what the electoral college does.
Talk here in Wisconsin is that Bush is way ahead of Kerry...and judging from the people I've talked to and the amount of pro-Bush signs up in the area I'd have to think that at least here in the lower Fox Valley it is true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by screaming_emuOriginally posted by PT737SWASo we may have a replay of 2000 where Bush won, without winning the popular vote.Fly Raleigh-Durham International, with direct flights on Air Canada, AirTran, American Airlines, American Eagle, America West, Continental Airlines, Continental Express, Delta Airlines, Delta Connection, jetBlue, Northwest Airlines, Southwest Airlines, United Express and US Airways to:
ATL, AUS, BWI, BOS, CHS, CLT, MDW, ORD, CVG, CLE, DFW, DTW, FLL, BDL, HOU, IND, LAS, LAX, LGW, MEM, MIA, MSP, BNA, EWR, MSY, JFK, LGA, ORF, MCO, PHL, PHX, PIT, STL, SLC, TPA, YYZ, DCA and IAD.
Comment
-
Originally posted by B757300Great, another foreigner who thinks his opinion about the U.S. election actually means something.
In case you haven’t checked, Bush is doing just fine. He is well ahead of Kerry in the Electoral College, which is what really matters. Bush has a lock on all the states he won in 2000 with only Ohio and New Hampshire being troublesome but not a cause for serious concern. Kerry on the other hand is in danger of Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New Mexico, Oregon, and Michigan going for Bush. Also, due to changes from the 2000 census, the states Bush won in 2000 give him more electoral votes than they did in the last election. So Bush could lose New Hampshire and still win with 274 EV’s. Kerry on the other hand has to take a large state from Bush and not lose any others at the same time.
next trips
USA/DXB August.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Longreach747we have an opinion due to the fact that YOUR elections are shoved down our face by the media.
That being said, I agree with you. Our elections shouldn't be shoved down your throat; however it shoud be covered in a way that thsoe who care are happy, and that those who don't care don't feel overwhelmed by information that is of little interest to them.Fly Raleigh-Durham International, with direct flights on Air Canada, AirTran, American Airlines, American Eagle, America West, Continental Airlines, Continental Express, Delta Airlines, Delta Connection, jetBlue, Northwest Airlines, Southwest Airlines, United Express and US Airways to:
ATL, AUS, BWI, BOS, CHS, CLT, MDW, ORD, CVG, CLE, DFW, DTW, FLL, BDL, HOU, IND, LAS, LAX, LGW, MEM, MIA, MSP, BNA, EWR, MSY, JFK, LGA, ORF, MCO, PHL, PHX, PIT, STL, SLC, TPA, YYZ, DCA and IAD.
Comment
-
Originally posted by B757300Great, another foreigner who thinks his opinion about the U.S. election actually means something.
In case you haven’t checked, Bush is doing just fine. He is well ahead of Kerry in the Electoral College, which is what really matters. Bush has a lock on all the states he won in 2000 with only Ohio and New Hampshire being troublesome but not a cause for serious concern. Kerry on the other hand is in danger of Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New Mexico, Oregon, and Michigan going for Bush. Also, due to changes from the 2000 census, the states Bush won in 2000 give him more electoral votes than they did in the last election. So Bush could lose New Hampshire and still win with 274 EV’s. Kerry on the other hand has to take a large state from Bush and not lose any others at the same time.
Tsk Tsk Tsk.....Actually his opinion does mean somthing....because what goes on here effects the whole world....***My Blog***
Comment
-
Originally posted by screaming_emuOriginally posted by PT737SWASo we may have a replay of 2000 where Bush won, without winning the popular vote.It's a Jeep thing, you wouldn't understand.
Comment
-
Originally posted by screaming_emuOriginally posted by PT737SWASo we may have a replay of 2000 where Bush won, without winning the popular vote.
Think about this, if the "popular vote" was all that mattered, where would the candidates spend all their time? Most likely in New York, Chicago, LA, San Francisco, Dallas, Houston, Miami, and a few other large cities. In other words, the votes of most people would become unimportant as no candidate would ever waste time going to a state with a small population.
The Electoral College also helps to counter balance Democrat voter fraud.
Comment
-
Originally posted by herpa2003Originally posted by screaming_emuOriginally posted by PT737SWASo we may have a replay of 2000 where Bush won, without winning the popular vote.
Oh yeah...and that's why SC is such a battleground state...
Comment
Comment