Haven't seen this posted; but TAP your neighbors to the East just voted for the same thing as Canada and they voted the same way Canada did!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Same-sex marriage sanctioned in Canada
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Tanner_JHaven't seen this posted; but TAP your neighbors to the East just voted for the same thing as Canada and they voted the same way Canada did!
Regards.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PT737SWAJust because some may disagree with the practice of homosexuality doesn't mean they don't deserve the same rights as everyone else.
Comment
-
Spain Allows Gay Marriages:
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...age050630.html
Just two days after Canadian members of Parliament passed same-sex marriage legislation, Spanish lawmakers have voted to allow gays and lesbians to legally marry.
Leader of Spain's Popular Party, Mariano Rajoy, speaks against the bill legalizing gay marriage in the Spanish parliament, Madrid, Thursday, June 30. (AP photo)
The vote in the 350-seat Congress of Deputies was 187 in favour, 147 against and four abstentions.
Comment
-
I think part of our problem is that most people on this site are white anglo saxon men/young men. We haven't been discriminated against like women, blacks, gays/lesbians, muslims and a host of other people.
If you don't suffer discrimination it can be hard to fathom how people who are discriminated against feel. You can read books/papers or watch movies on discrimination, but until you are on the receiving end of hate you don't know what it is like.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ptbodaleI think part of our problem is that most people on this site are white anglo saxon men/young men. We haven't been discriminated against like women, blacks, gays/lesbians, muslims and a host of other people.
If you don't suffer discrimination it can be hard to fathom how people who are discriminated against feel. You can read books/papers or watch movies on discrimination, but until you are on the receiving end of hate you don't know what it is like.
Comment
-
Originally posted by andrew_cIf they want to screw around with their same sex, let them. Governments should not have power on who you may marry or not.
If they want to have sex with someone of their own sex...let them. But, when it comes to a state (gov't) sanctioned marriage, there is a difference. Benefits in the form of tax breaks, medical insurance, social security benefits etc., are financed through taxes. Taxes that people pay. When the majority of tax payers don't want to support spending on gays, and the problems associated with them (increased health care costs, higher rates of STDs, more frequent changing of partners, etc.), then it is the governments duty to support the will of the majority and not allow that spending by not allowing the marriage.
It may not be that way in Canada, but here in the U.S. the states represent the will of the people in the majority.
Now, ...why not allow polygamy? or marriage between adults and children? Why should the government disallow them? Why can't some person marry their dog, cat, horse, etc? Why should the government disallow marriage and bennefits to them? Are you saying they can't love them as much as two gay men love each other? Are you trying to quantify an amount of love? Do you think the gov't should do that?
Rubbish.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JeffinDENIt may not be that way in Canada, but here in the U.S. the states represent the will of the people in the majority.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TAP-A343First of all I would to say to you that I respect your sexual orientation. I'm against homosexuality (same gender sexual relations) not homosexuals (people with same gender sexual attraction).
By the way, this is also the position of the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church being against homosexuals is a myth. It's against homosexuality not homosexuals.
Originally posted by TAP-A343Well, I'm neither a Canadian citizen nor a resident in Canada so this doesn't really affect me. However, if I were I wouldn't like that my union with a woman would have the same name as a same-sex union. If homosexuals are entitled to demand that their unions are called the same way as heterosexual ones than I think I'm entitled to demand the opposite.
Regards.
Also, for your reading pleasure,
"Some of the best homophobes are also some of the best homosexuals"
- quote from Ellen Degeneris.
But then again, you probably agree with her existence, but not her sexual urges right?Whatever is necessary, is never unwise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AA 1818Also, for your reading pleasure,
"Some of the best homophobes are also some of the best homosexuals"
- quote from Ellen Degeneris.
"Some of the best heterophobes are also some of the worst homosexuals"
- quote from me.
Regards.
Comment
Comment