Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TWA ver2.0--Is It Possible?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bok269
    replied
    Originally posted by TransWorld727
    I definitely see your point there. I think part of Pan Am's failure was the management/fleet combination--Either way, there's always the exception to the rule. A new TWA might have a chance if properly managed, and properly planned. Again, there's still the issue of getting the name from AA.
    Is it just me, or is part of the problem the fact that it is very hard to start off a full-service, non-LCC these days? With the fare war going on, it seems hard for a new airline to start now. An old name could be brought back for an LCC, but those should probably have fresh namesto portray a youthful image.

    Leave a comment:


  • TransWorld727
    replied
    Originally posted by DAL767-400ER
    Even if AA was willing to give up the TWA name, history has shown that reincarnated airlines are not necessarily a good thing.
    Pan Am has been restarted twice so far. The first reincarnation failed fast, and the second incarnation went through an identity crisis itself and is what you see today, a scab airline that drops cities after 2 months without warning and generally lacks any kind of business plan.
    Braniff got back twice, and went BK thrice
    Western Airlines Mk II didn't last longer than 2 months
    Compass Airlines (Oz) was a dual failure as well
    etc
    I definitely see your point there. I think part of Pan Am's failure was the management/fleet combination--Either way, there's always the exception to the rule. A new TWA might have a chance if properly managed, and properly planned. Again, there's still the issue of getting the name from AA.

    Leave a comment:


  • DAL767-400ER
    replied
    Even if AA was willing to give up the TWA name, history has shown that reincarnated airlines are not necessarily a good thing.
    Pan Am has been restarted twice so far. The first reincarnation failed fast, and the second incarnation went through an identity crisis itself and is what you see today, a scab airline that drops cities after 2 months without warning and generally lacks any kind of business plan.
    Braniff got back twice, and went BK thrice
    Western Airlines Mk II didn't last longer than 2 months
    Compass Airlines (Oz) was a dual failure as well
    etc

    Leave a comment:


  • FlyingPhotog
    replied
    Yes it would probably be easier to bring back TWA if they had just gone out of business.

    Leave a comment:


  • Crunk415balla
    replied
    Originally posted by TransWorld727
    Yes, exactly. American would probably want an arm and a leg for the TWA name, that is if they'll even sell it.
    AA seem to be sticklers when it comes to anything to do with their name or that of their affiliates. Naming an airline Reno Air or Air Cal would be just as difficult.

    Leave a comment:


  • TransWorld727
    replied
    Originally posted by Greg
    One of the reasons AA gobbled up TWA to get rid of a compeititor. Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think anyone at AA would want to see the letters T-W-A in any combination anywhere.
    Yes, exactly. American would probably want an arm and a leg for the TWA name, that is if they'll even sell it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Greg
    replied
    One of the reasons AA gobbled up TWA to get rid of a compeititor. Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think anyone at AA would want to see the letters T-W-A in any combination anywhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • TransWorld727
    replied
    Originally posted by Bok269
    All it would take is someone buying the name from AA and getting some planes, landing rights, facilities. Problem is if the new airline is mismanaged. Look at Pan Am Clipper Connection/Boston-Maine (the third or fourth reincarnation of Pan Am). An everchanging route map, terrible routes, a fleet of 727s and Jetstreams, and most definately bound to fail. Its almost better to let these airlines rest in peace. It may be easier to start a new international airline when Open Skies come into effect, but I don't see any names being ressurected. Unfortunately.
    The main thing I'm worried about is getting the actual name from AA. I'm afraid of how much they would want for the name, and such a hefty cost at startup would not be a good way to start off! There's only one way to find out

    Leave a comment:


  • Bok269
    replied
    All it would take is someone buying the name from AA and getting some planes, landing rights, facilities. Problem is if the new airline is mismanaged. Look at Pan Am Clipper Connection/Boston-Maine (the third or fourth reincarnation of Pan Am). An everchanging route map, terrible routes, a fleet of 727s and Jetstreams, and most definately bound to fail. Its almost better to let these airlines rest in peace. It may be easier to start a new international airline when Open Skies come into effect, but I don't see any names being ressurected. Unfortunately.

    Leave a comment:


  • TransWorld727
    started a topic TWA ver2.0--Is It Possible?

    TWA ver2.0--Is It Possible?

    Hey guys!

    I was reading an old article on Airliners.net on the takeover of TWA. That made me think, what would it take to get TWA flying again? Is it possible? How would one go about acquiring the TWA name, if even possible?

    I only flew on TWA a few times, but it quickly grew to become my favourite airline. Trans World Airlines is a widely known name, even today. I really think what American did to the TWA employees was downright disgraceful. Anyways--that's my mini-rant

    Thanks in advance for any insight. :-]

    -TransWorld727
Working...
X