Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

just one more a.net thing.....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • just one more a.net thing.....

    I know a.net has been talked about ad nauseum on this board, but I happened to be scanning the forum, and I've got to say that a.net has some of the most moronic jackasses I've ever seen. If these idiots are the future of aviation, we're in a heap of trouble.

    Examples:Here

    And here... [/quote]

    And some quotes from posters at AOL concerning the legal case of the DUI America West pilots in Florida.:

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------

    Break the pilots union which is protecting them. Their reasoning- pilots can have a few because the plane flies itself, and all they do is monitor the systems. If this is true, then why must the pilots be paid up to $100,000 per year becasue they are supposedly such experts? You could get someone for under $30,000 to watch the dials. This would help bring down all the other wage scales and maybe put the airlines back into the black, or help put a cap on rising air fares.
    -----------------------
    Once the plane is on path in the sky it is put on an automatic pilot computerized program that ensures that the plane travels precisely on the path it is supposed to be on BUT! Experienced pilots are needed to land and for take off. In addition, those computerized controls do not factor in emergencies such as a plane or anything unexpectedly crossing the jets path. Or, if there is a malfunction or bad weather. In short you ALWAYS need a pilot and Copilot at the controls and personally I prefer that if I am flying how about you?
    -----------------------
    >In short you ALWAYS need a pilot and Copilot at the controls and personally I
    >prefer that if I am flying how about you?

    Preferable a sober one LOL
    -----------------------
    >pilots be paid up to $100,000 per year


    They make way more than that. My brother-in law makes $167,000/yr. and he is only 48. He figures he makes about $700/hour in flight. I am not kidding.
    -----------------------
    do planes crash themselves to
    -----------------------
    >do planes crash themselves to

    Sure if they run out of gas or a wing falls off or sumpin
    -----------------------
    Planes do not fly themselves, if that sort of intervention were available, we could have prevented 9-11
    -----------------------
    >Planes do not fly themselves, if that sort of intervention were available, we
    >could have prevented 9-11

    Well they really can-but the pilot can override the auto pilot

    -----------------------
    You dont know what your talking about. Lets see you try your hand at "monitoring" the stystems of a multimillion dollar machine, while making decisions that affect the lives of hundreds of people on each one flight. Lets not forget the wrong decision results in death.
    -----------------------
    > then why must the pilots be paid up to $100,000 per year becasue they are
    >supposedly such experts? You could get someone for under $30,000 to watch
    >the dials. This would help bring down all the other wage scales and maybe
    >put the airlines back into the black, or help put a cap on rising air fares.


    Or we could fly them by remote control
    -----------------------
    Absolutely that union is only there to protect THEM. Let's hire some Street People at minimum wage to watch the dials. And that union, they have never been involved in ANY Safety Procedures. They don't care about anything except protecting drunks. No union does. They do nothing about helping to support the rise in even minimum wage.
    Sir, perhaps you need to read a few more books and let the newspapers be for 7th graders.
    -----------------------
    If you think that there is nothing to the airline piloting profession and that a $30,000 a year bozo sitting up there is acceptable, then perhaps you should become familiar with Korean Air. They have recorded 12 fatal accidents over the last decade alone. Everything about Korean's operation was done with the same mentality that you are pushing. "Airplanes that fly themselves" didn't keep Korean Air out of trouble. The only thing that keeps any airline out of trouble is well trained crews in the air and on the ground. Korean Air has begun cleaning up its act by investing heavily in safety. They no longer take a "nothing to it" attitude. They found out that it kills.
    -----------------------
    So many morons on this board spouting off on topics that they know absolutely nothing about.

    >If this is true, then why must the pilots be paid up to $100,000 per year
    >becasue they are supposedly such experts? You could get someone for under
    >$30,000 to watch the dials.

    -----------------------
    God is the pilot, and the people we know as pilots are actually co-pilots. NO PLANE FLIES ITS SELF
    ---------------------------------------------------------


    Just an agonizing little cross-section of public opinion

  • #2
    I know a.net has been talked about ad nauseum on this board, but I happened to be scanning the forum, and I've got to say that a.net has some of the most moronic jackasses I've ever seen. If these idiots are the future of aviation, we're in a heap of trouble.
    I AGREE IF THEY ARE THE FUTURE OF AVIATION THAN WE A SCREWED
    frist is my last name, not a type-o

    Comment


    • #3
      Or some of the idiots in this thread including the starter.

      http://www.airliners.net/discussions...d.main/1153251

      I think a lot of these so called "new" members are just the trouble makers returning after having been banned 1-3 years ago.[/url]

      Comment


      • #4
        Well we know why B737500 or whatever his name is is so upset for. You hit his nerve

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by some guy in a.net
          They are still at! Pilots want to carry firearms. Sorry, if they want to fly, do that. If you are in peril, don your PBE and flood the cockpit wit pepper spray, dump the cabin pressure and put the A/C into unbelievable maneuvers. Just don't start spaying bullets around. You are supposed to be professional pilots, not gunslingers!
          ROTFLMAO!!!!!
          "The Director also sets the record straight on what would happen if oxygen masks were to drop from the ceiling: The passengers freak out with abandon, instead of continuing to chat amiably, as though lunch were being served, like they do on those in-flight safety videos."

          -- The LA Times, in a review of 'Flightplan'

          Comment


          • #6
            There's still hope for aviation!! It's j.net members like us!
            Welcome to Buckeye City! They call me Mr.sniffles
            _______________________________________
            Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by B757300
              Or some of the idiots in this thread including the starter.

              http://www.airliners.net/discussions...d.main/1153251

              I think a lot of these so called "new" members are just the trouble makers returning after having been banned 1-3 years ago.[/url]
              Uggh! The sheer idiocy over there is just painful to read!

              Comment


              • #8
                Hello,

                Some time ago you emailed me with a few kind words expressing how much you enjoy Airliners.net. It made me very happy, it's great to hear that the site is appreciated!

                I thought I'd ask you of a small favour. If you have the time, it would be very kind if you could post a short review of Airliners.net on our Alexa page. It doesn't need to be anything long or fancy, just a few words expressing why you like Airliners.net. The reason I am asking is that it seems our site has been the victim of a smear campaign from one of our "competitors", who filled that Alexa page with lots of bad reviews. I will certainly not sink to their level and ask you to post anything bad about them on their Alexa page, I simply ask that if you have the time and will, it would be great if you could write something positive about us.

                You can find our entry on Alexa here:
                http://www.alexa.com/data/details?url=airliners.net

                And you can write your short review here:
                http://www.alexa.com/data/details/wr...=airliners.net

                Thank you very much for your support! I will try to send this out to those that I can find in my email program that's sent words of appreciation in the past, hopefully it will neutralize that smear campaign.

                With Kind Regards,
                Johan Lundgren
                Editor Airliners.net


                ADG
                ADG
                No makeovers please .....

                Comment


                • #9
                  Cool, I have been meaning to write some reviews. Thanks for the link.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Surprise, surprise!

                    Not that I am insinuating anything, but couldn't anyone type that letter and passed if off as being from Johan?

                    It's just so sad to see people get so upset and harbor such ill will over it.

                    I mean, after all, it's only the internet.


                    ---------------------------------------------------------------------

                    Tim Tams for all the good little boys and girls!
                    Witness the miracle of flight.
                    Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Some idiot has written around 15 5-Star reviews for Airliners.net today on Alexa. Talk about not having a freaking life.

                      Edit: Alexa deleted about 75% of the fake reviews.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        http://www.airliners.net/discussions....main/1156536/


                        A 13-15 with 37 years seniority with TWA.

                        ROTFLMAO

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Glad to see someone has something nice to say about a.net though Jeffinden, but it would have been better if it had been because it's what you believe rather than a failed attempt to piss someone off





                          ADG
                          ADG
                          No makeovers please .....

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Greg
                            http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1156536/


                            A 13-15 with 37 years seniority with TWA.

                            ROFLMAO
                            Amazing that he joined Airliners.net in May '01 but has only posted 12 times. Airliners.net's mods should do an IP check against anyone who has been banned lately. It has to be someone's "reserve" username.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Greg
                              http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1156536/


                              A 13-15 with 37 years seniority with TWA.

                              ROFLMAO

                              ROTFLMAO!!!!!! That post sure made my day, you just have to love the maturity on that site Now I remember why I came to this site! :P

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X