Originally posted by turbotraker
View Post
If you're poor how much of a chance do you have against a popular powerfull rich elite like Michael Jackson? If you started receiving death threats against yourself and your child; do you really think you would have the willpower to continue the prosecution even though it is humiliating your child and exposing him to the ridicule and all the pressures that is associated with being in the lime light? Do you really think you could continue with the prosecution even though you lose your job, home and possessions and receive skepticism, ridicule, vandalism and death threats wherever you go?
If you realize there's a good chance you're going to lose because you're going against someone rich and powerful that has a lot of public support and can afford the best defense teams; wouldn't it be tempting to go for an out-of-court settlement that would end a lot of the death threats and ridicule and might help your child get psychological counseling and a college education? Would you really be willing to sacrifice your job, house and child on the outside chance that you might get a conviction of the perpetrator?
Originally posted by Simpleboy
View Post
Michael Jackson's Child Porn Collection For Sale
Originally posted by Simpleboy
View Post
I think it was three of the jurors on the Michael Jackson trial admitted that after the verdict was announced that they realized they made the wrong decision.
It's much like the Mapplethorpe controversy; I don't consider a man urinating into another man's mouth to be "art". Courts don't always do the right thing. Michael Jackson had popularity on his side would quite likely biased the jury in his favor. As you seem to be suggesting many of us are quite skeptical the jury's rulings on the O.J. Simpson trial.
I know I certainly wouldn't let my child spend the night with a freak like Michael Jackson that gives alcoholic beverages to children and then hops in bed with them and allegedly shows them porn.
Leave a comment: