Petition: un-ban IntheShade

[3WE]

I had over 2000 images in the database at that point which is a substantial contribution to the site and far more than he will ever contribute, in any way.

I am not a photographer.

I participate in discussion forums.

This particular part of JP.net is...ummmm...a discussion forum.

Your 2000 photographs contriubte nothing to the discussion of plane crashes, the incredibly complex insidious swiss cheese nuances, or aviation humor, or discussions of aviation processes in any way...

Oh my, I am totally wrong...let's discuss this new livery...

[PMN]

I am not a photographer.

I participate in discussion forums.

This particular part of JP.net is...ummmm...a discussion forum.

Your 2000 photographs contriubte nothing to the discussion of plane crashes, the incredibly complex insidious swiss cheese nuances, or aviation humor, or discussions of aviation processes in any way...

Oh my, I am totally wrong...let's discuss this new livery...

Why did you take that personally? Did I aim it at you? No, I aimed it at ITS; someone who spent more time trying to piss people off than contribute to discussions.

Paul

[3WE]

Why did you take that personally? Did I aim it at you? No, I aimed it at ITS; someone who spent more time trying to piss people off than contribute to discussions.

Paul

I did not take it personally. I just am bothered when people make wrong statements.

1) I took it personally (wrong)
2) Your number of photographs gives you some ranking on discussion fora. (wrong)
3) ITS is nothing but a troll (wrong)
4) Numerous absolute statements (which are almost always- wrong!)

ever...any...nothing more...sole purpose...blindlngly obvious... whole sorry state of affairs...

Speaking as someone who spent a day royally PO'd at ITS (yes me), it's blindingly obvious that you can't handle the fact that ITS stirs crap, yet contributes greatly in the areanas of humor and knowledge.

It's complex and anything but absolute.

You, quite simply, are wrong.

[seahawk]

Comprehension problem!

Go back and read what Per/Ancient Mariner said.

This is anything but a new situation.

Go read PPrune. (Unfortunately you CANNOT read AD.com or AD-Info.com) Heck go read some forums that have nothing to do with avaition...

Same stuff, different day:

1) Idiots
2) Know it alls
3) Humorists
4) Fun-lovers
5) Totally serious folks
6) Wanna-be-s of all of the above.
7) Folks that vary between serious and fun
8 Folks with little tolerance for people not like themselves.
9) No doubt there are some additional categories

Anyway, ITS haters are in category 8

Oh, I did fully well understand what Per said. He was banned there he was banned here and he is rumoured to have said that he "will never post on a Kilroy forum again". So the whole topic is moot.

[Verbal]

Would anyone fancy an ice lolly?

[Princess Leia]

Would anyone fancy an ice lolly?

Verbie you're 0 for 2 with photo uploads lately.

[Verbal]

Verbie you're 0 for 2 with photo uploads lately.

The uploads work fine. Until the mods decide to take them down.

[(J)]

The uploads work fine. Until the mods decide to take them down.

In between designing flaps please describe the photographs.

[Optimus Prime]

I am not a photographer.

I participate in discussion forums.

This particular part of JP.net is...ummmm...a discussion forum.

Your 2000 photographs contriubte nothing to the discussion of plane crashes, the incredibly complex insidious swiss cheese nuances, or aviation humor, or discussions of aviation processes in any way...

Oh my, I am totally wrong...let's discuss this new livery...

lets just face the fact that the true trolls of this forum are the ITS haters who just saw he bolds too much.. he say a bad thing, etc ,etc.

Maybe if we serve some Texas wine to these losers they will loosen up

[Optimus Prime]

In between designing flaps please describe the photographs.

Lets dig a bit deep and discuss how manual single-lens-reflex (SLR) technologies are impacted by cheap composites

[Baaboo]

[tommyalf]

Lets dig a bit deep and discuss how manual single-lens-reflex (SLR) technologies are impacted by cheap composites

That's only if you buy Nikon..Canon produces far superior machines.

[Verbal]

In between designing flaps please describe the photographs.

The removed photo depicted Petal relaxing with a cigarette in a hot bath.

[Optimus Prime]

That's only if you buy Nikon..Canon produces far superior machines.

SO this becomes a Nikon vs Canon discussion.

[3WE]

Lets dig a bit deep and discuss how manual single-lens-reflex (SLR) technologies are impacted by cheap composites

Have autofocus/autoexposure/digital cameras/photoshop and FMS/fly by wire/composites/ballistic chutes destroyed photography and airmanship?

We know ITS owns a taildragger and when he flies it is is pure art.

Do you think he has a totally manual SLR film camrea and takes excellent photographs?

Would he even work in the medium of black and white and use ASA 800 film to freeze fast-moving aircraft?