Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Boeing 767 range question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Boeing 767 range question

    Just a question about 767s. Why the 767-200 has greater range that 767-300 ? In one magazine (Kaleidoscope [LOT]) it says that 767-200s range is 9,980km and 767-300s range is 9,120 km. I though 763 has greater range because it's larger and probably can tank more fuel.

  • #2
    Originally posted by pkonowrocki
    Just a question about 767s. Why the 767-200 has greater range that 767-300 ? In one magazine (Kaleidoscope [LOT]) it says that 767-200s range is 9,980km and 767-300s range is 9,120 km. I though 763 has greater range because it's larger and probably can tank more fuel.
    I have some charts on AC 762's an 763's, but ill have to dig for them.

    AC762's (Non ER) have 5000km less range then the 767-333ER, -375 (because there GE powerd) have less range, -375, ex Canadian, have less range in the sense. -300ER's with GE have 10,800km range, vs GE's with 10,100km range. Longest 767-300 route in the world is YYZ-TLV I belive.

    -200ER's with GE's have a ballpark range of 12,000km. Thats about 7000km more than the just plain -200.
    -Kevin

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by ACman
      Longest 767-300 route in the world is YYZ-TLV I belive.
      Maybe that's not true but I'm pretty much sure that I saw EL AL 762 landing in YYZ few days ago. Does it mean that it is also the longest 762 route ? Or maybe it was not non-stop flight.

      Comment


      • #4
        Late build Boeing 767-200(ER)s had the -300(ER)s larger centre wing tank installed, giving them an identical fuel capacity. As the aircraft is lighter and has lower thrust engines the fuel consumption is less therefore range increases.

        Earlier build -200(ER)s had smaller CWTs, and of course earlier build non-ER 767s had no CWT at all.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks AJ. That was great to hear ! I find these info's very useful.
          Inactive from May 1 2009.

          Comment


          • #6
            Flying time YYZ-TLV on AC084-06Apr was 10:59, the return
            AC087-07Apr was 12:05.

            AC033 HNL-SYD has a flying time of 10H40 and AC034 SYD-HNL has a flying time of 9H50.

            Air Canada did operate a weight restricted B763 on YYZ-NRT for a short time. Flyng time on that route was 13H10, the return NRT-YYZ was 11H30. An A343 covers the route now.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by ptbodale
              Air Canada did operate a weight restricted B763 on YYZ-NRT for a short time. Flyng time on that route was 13H10, the return NRT-YYZ was 11H30. An A343 covers the route now.
              Wonder if they went to to refuel or something, or was this a non-stop?

              I flew on SK 763 on the HKG-CPH-HKG, flights was varied on 11H20 sector, back when SAS operated these 76's
              Inactive from May 1 2009.

              Comment


              • #8
                No it was a non-stop, however we had a max pax load of 170. The acft holds 212. Then depending on the winds and the day we could board more and sometimes less.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ptbodale
                  No it was a non-stop, however we had a max pax load of 170. The acft holds 212. Then depending on the winds and the day we could board more and sometimes less.
                  Seems pretty logic and possible ! Thanks
                  Inactive from May 1 2009.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ptbodale
                    No it was a non-stop, however we had a max pax load of 170. The acft holds 212. Then depending on the winds and the day we could board more and sometimes less.
                    We also do that with the non X A340-313. Cargo restirctions to.
                    -Kevin

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I guess the A340-500 and A340-600 is another example.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Kevin
                        I guess the A340-500 and A340-600 is another example.
                        And I bet there will be some on A380
                        thx for the info everyone, especially AJ for very specific info

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          completely OT, but since we are chatting at Boeing and Air Canada, when will the first of the planes arrive from the new order?

                          Sorry again for the OT.
                          My Flickr Pictures! Click Me!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Cameron
                            completely OT, but since we are chatting at Boeing and Air Canada, when will the first of the planes arrive from the new order?

                            Sorry again for the OT.
                            I don't know when but do you mean 777s or 787s ?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by pkonowrocki
                              I don't know when but do you mean 777s or 787s ?
                              Yup
                              My Flickr Pictures! Click Me!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X