Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Power vs. Range

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Power vs. Range

    I'm kind of curious about some of the larger bizjets that are really overpowered. I know the range on the Gulfstreams like the G-IV and G-550 are pretty impressive for an aircraft of that size, but I've heard that they're also really really really overpowered also. Would Gulfstream gain any noticeable range increase by using smaller, more efficient engines on their jets , sacrificing a little bit of climb and maybe speed for greater range? I've heard (don't know if this is true) that they're so overpowered that occasionally they have to taxi with the thrust reversers slightly deployed.


  • #2
    I dont know much about all the other stuff, but I do know that when I see them at the local airport they do often taxi with their reversers deployed. Some times only with one deployed. Heres a photo of mine I got of it.

    [photoid=5889562]

    http://www.youtube.com/DC3Vette - playing guitar

    Comment


    • #3
      Having a bit more extra "grunt" means they can operate into some quite small airstrips for their weight, making them versatile and useful as a business jet. As a business jet owner, you'd want to be able to land at all the relatively small, yet convenient, airstrips around.

      Add to that the fact they are twin engine aeroplanes that have to be able to perform on one engine, (think for example the 767... also appears very overpowered due to having to be able to meet climb gradients on one engine).

      As a pilot, I have no problems with an overpowered aircraft

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by MCM
        As a pilot, I have no problems with an overpowered aircraft
        No, you got it wrong. As a pilot you think EVERY airplane is underpowered

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by screaming_emu
          No, you got it wrong. As a pilot you think EVERY airplane is underpowered
          Even an SR-71

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by screaming_emu
            No, you got it wrong. As a pilot you think EVERY airplane is underpowered
            I guess that's what happen when you spend too much time in trainers.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Christobal65
              Even an SR-71
              of course! There is no flaw in this logic!

              Comment


              • #8
                i think 777s are overpowered, lol but some a300s seens to have some smallllllllllll engines

                yes i am a boeing fan, and i know thats a airbus, haha

                Comment


                • #9
                  Emu's correct. There are no overpowered aircraft. Even the SR.

                  When you hang big ass motors on an airplane, it will help you get off the ground sooner, and up to higher altitudes quicker where you can enjoy more favorable winds and lower fuel burn.

                  Hanging smaller engines on a Gulfstream would have a negative impact to that effect, as well as decrease engine life since you're running it harder and hotter.

                  If you're using the GV as an example, you have an airplane that is designed to haul 89,000 lbs off a short runway to an initial cruise altitude of FL410, then cruise climb as burns off fuel on a 7000 mi flight.

                  You're not going to do that with less thrust.
                  Bite me Airways.....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    And remember, as far as taxiing goes, planes aren't optimized for taxiing, as it accounts fro a minute amount of its operations.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X