CFIT - a turn back due to technical issue not related to the cause of the crash - a nocturnal visual straight-in approach over unpopulated area abandoned due to miscalculation on glide slope/speed - a left hand orbit (approved by the controller) resulted in loss of visual contact with runway and any ground references, yet continued - - altitude/vertical speed not monitored - TWS warnings ignored as nuisance warnings due to non-landing configuration despite the assumption of being in level flight - left wing strike in a slight roll - impact with level terrain.

PIC with 18000 hrs.

Report in English: https://www.cao.ir/web/accidents/rep...lIQS93PT0=.pdf...

Greetings Everyone,

I have been debating for probably over a year now to submit shots to JetPhotos and I would like to test the waters and get some feedback from the community and hopefully some screeners on any glaring issues I would need to fix before submitting any photos. I will post a few sample images I have and look forward to your feedback.

- Chris



...

This one really illustrates the danger of getting behind the airplane in the approach while trying to save it. This was a very experienced crew with good old stick and rudder skills flying a non-precision instrument approach. They were 700ft high crossing the outer marker and deployed spoilers to put the plane into a 1500fpm descent. They left the spoilers extended after levelling off at MDA (perhaps in the high-workload moment they were mistaken as being armed for landing) slowed to stall warning activation and received an almost simultaneous ATC instruction to go-around due to traffic separation. Then, with the stickshaker still active, they retracted flaps to go-around. With the spoilers in the flight detent position and the reduced flaps the plane stalled and impacted a residential neighborhood.

I feel pretty certain these pilots would not have made these mistakes if they had time to think clearly and exercise the normal amount of caution.

https://en.wiki...

Please post your queries about Aircraft / Registration / Serial Number info here!

Found this photo while uploading a photo of the real 44-87779, as this one says in the comments, should be 44-83663. Screeners can you fix this? S/n 32304

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/7236204
A few comments to make here. Would those who find a data error please fix it by using the "Correct Photo" facility found at the bottom of the image and not by adding a comment to the image. Also, please don't email the photographer as there is no guarantee that the data will be changed.

If the correction includes a registration or aircraft type/manufacturer change them please also check the c/n as this will almost certainly be different. A Google search is the best place to check in the vast majority of cases.

Thank you.

Hi, could someone give me a feedback on this picture? Thanks in advance....

Hi, could I get some general feedback of these 5 photos? Thanks!
...

Decided to start collecting models for every aircraft I have worked on as an AMT
Un-boxing the first aircraft I ever worked on and the first heavy aircraft I ever worked on. Gemini 200 Delta CRJ200 and Lufthansa A330
...