Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

User Profile

Collapse

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
Avatar
llpilch
Junior Member
Last Activity: 2021-04-08, 17:33
Joined: 2009-05-04
Location:
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • Hello!

    This photo also shows a reused reg to a new aircraft, can the badge be added?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10113565

    Thanks!
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Totally agree hahaha

    What kind of person pay for other people to click on his pictures? Just to pretend to be a better people? Get higher and higher numbers of views and likes for what? What exactly does it means to someone?

    I admit i'm proud of having more than 2.000.000 views on my photos, but I'm proud of it just because I never did the stupid thing of paying people to see it hahaha, they are just nice pictures which were seen spontaneously more than two million times because are good pictures, not because I paid anyone!

    I agree with doublearon2003, the site would be a lot more reliable if only real good pictures and photographers were shown on front page, photos that really deserves to be there!...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Thats perfect! That is simply why we write f/22 or 1:22, Both "/" and ":" are used to determine the division operation....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Hello!

    1 .Does the Cirrus N138MF have a chance? Too much crop, I think the quality is gone;
    2. The Phenon N129GD has a very different painting scheme as the other photo on DB, is it hot to update on FR24?
    3. The Hawker N305SH, this registration is for an helicopter, again, is it hot? If yes, will I have to comment on "hot photo" field or is it automatic when I change the aircraft type?
    4. The Global N137ZM, this strange angle is acceptable? And the left wing was obstructed, so I cut it off, is it ok?
    5. Will the A321 CC-BEC be similar with this if this one gets accepted: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9013718 ? Different angles, different backgrounds, but the same takeoff sequence.

    thanks!...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • llpilch
    replied to Queue slots
    Waiting for it even more anxiously!!!


    There is something else that i'm thinking in these days when the queue reached 15000+ photos: how many banned users who still trying to upload pictures exists? Last week I saw in the forum an user complaining about a rejection and a crew member said something like "when will you understand that you are banned?" So, seems like he is been trying to upload photos a lot of times, even being banned. I was banned for a long time, before talking to the site admin and try to revert my ban, I tried to upload photos something like 3 times, and it was possible, but they was rejected.

    If a user is banned, why can he still upload images to the queue? Why don't just simply disable the function to upload as it happens when reach the slots limit? Less photos on queue, less unecessary work for the screeners, more fast the queue goes....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • llpilch
    replied to Queue slots
    Nice!

    Waiting for it anxiously!

    JPElite nevermore?
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • llpilch
    started a topic Queue slots

    Queue slots

    Hello! I wanted to post a reply on this topic: https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...-starter-queue

    But there is an error occurring when I try to reply some topics (Invalid node id specified)




    Why don't assign the number of slots based on a recent acceptance ratio? It would estimulate the photographers to upload only their best. If they do so, more slots. If they don't, they loose slots.

    For example: today I have almost 1500 accepted photos with 75.63% of acceptance ratio, but if i look the last 70 days of the queue, the number goes to 91.72%.

    All of us know that there is a lot of begginers (as I myself was, nothing against them) who upload many photos below de standards, and they have the same 20 slots than photographers with 80, 90% of acceptance. Easy to see in the queue status that in the same period that I had 90% of acceptance ratio, the total queue sometimes has only 40%. So, why don't give more slots for those...
    See more | Go to post

  • What about this one, as "ramp"? Had to use very high ISO setting as the 767 was taxiing (the reason why it is blurry). But i like the picture because for this little airport it is a rare event, those cargos are common, every week, but the 3 together is very rare!...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa thanks for all your attention here!

    What do you think about the 5 below? All of them has something bothering me, don't think they have a chance, but asking is free ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Thanks Erwin! I saw the corrections were made!

    Just one more thing, now "SSPG" is duplicated, what do ou think about merge them as was made with "SBBI"? Both names are correct, one in Portuguese, one in English, the English one is the oldest.

    Best regards!...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Suggestion to correct 3 airports

    Hello! I sent this via "contact form" on the site, but got no answer, don't know if anyone saw it.

    There are 3 corrections that i'd like to suggest, the 1st not so important, but I think the 2nd and 3rd are:

    1- The IATA code "SBBI" returns two airports in the auto-fill (the same airport with two names) what do you think about unify them as "Curitiba Aeroporto de Bacacheri - SBBI, Brazil"? (or in English: Curitiba Bacacheri Airport - SBBI, Brazil)

    2- Both codes "SBPG" and "SSPG" are registered for the same airport (Paranaguá), but "SBPG" is WRONG!' All those photos should have the airport corrected to "Aeroporto de Paranaguá - SSPG, Brazil" (or, in English, Paranaguá Airport - SSPG, Brazil)
    https://www.jetphotos.com/airport/Pa...gua%20-%20SBPG

    3- The code "SBPG" mentioned above is from another airport, in the city of Ponta Grossa....
    See more | Go to post

  • llpilch
    replied to Airport Overviews
    If you have a picture from inside the terminal, it will be "terminal";

    If it's outside the terminal but shows only or mostly the terminal, it will also be "terminal";

    If the picture shows a view of various aircraft at the ramp, or only the ramp itself, it will be "ramp";

    Now, if the image shows a wider view where you can see 2 or more of this items, then it will be "airport overview" (ramp + terminal, ramp + control tower + runway, runway + control tower + terminal...)
    Sometimes a photo showing ramp + terminal can be sent as "ramp" or "terminal" or "airport overview", more than one designation can apply. I have a shot on queue that a JP crew said in other topic that both "airport overview" and "spotting location" can work for that image I can chose one.

    Iit will depend on the subject of the image
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:

No activity results to display
Show More
Working...
X