User Profile

[StefBrat]

I leveled again with your suggestion but for me it looks not that better. Don't know why but the tower in the back seems to be always leaning to the side. But windows looking better now..


______________
Is this now better for the Aegan?

...

[StefBrat]

I wonder how someone can get a hot photo when the plane is already in database and its a static one so it can't change it's reg

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9940132 - "hot"

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9886552 - existing one

Its the static helicopter in the roundabout near airbus helicopter....

[StefBrat]

Seems my EXIF where deleted while processing oh f****

Please correct these pics taken all on 22.10.2020:
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9943953
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9943942
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9940747
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9940724

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9940690
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9935407
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9916912
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9916896
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9917347

These where taken at 25.10.2020
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9943938
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9943939

This is taken at 03.07.2019
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9934400
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9943955

Taken at 11.07.2019
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9933396
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9933314

[StefBrat]

Thanks for this.

I tried leveling and added more clockwise rotation as the screener wrote. No I used a fine raster to check with the red/white pole in the back. But it always looks strange. Then I took a ruler and left of the pole I had 0,2cm the whole pole. But on the right it was 0,3 and 0,4cm. Now I corrected the right side a bit and then I had left the discrepancy. Maybe the pole is so old (old military field) that I better use the windows which look good so far for me with the uploaded edit.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8617006
___________

Sun was on the left of the photo and shining with the aircraft creating the nice shine but did not edit anything special then else on other photos
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8617089...

[StefBrat]

Whats meant here? I think the screener refers to the license plates but there was no comment or something else. I blurred the plate, the one at the SUV was indeed good readable on the normal photo and the rest maybe a bit. So I edited this to get in line with the rules.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8600295
____
Would this be considered as backlight?
...

[StefBrat]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8561975

It's a reupload after contrast rejection and now added a bunch of contrast within LR but once again rejection. Weather was dull and not the best...

[StefBrat]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8556491

I can see in the photo the REG is slightly less sharper then the nose. But I looked into it with LR and 100% zoom and there it looked not that bad, also the focus points are good set. I also think its may caused by the engine blast. But the rest looks good with tires and engines and DHL titles.
____________
Will this drone be rejected because of obstructing? No other way is possible as it belongs to a company area and I only got clearence if not entering the "flowers", grass and stones.
...