Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

User Profile

Collapse

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
bgkicks49
bgkicks49
Member
Last Activity: Yesterday, 22:25
Joined: 2019-05-16
Location: Minneapolis, MN
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • So I had this photo pre-screened by you Dana on the 9th and I understand that certain screeners have different takes, but just looking for clarification on this specific photo of XA-MIA. Was this rejected because of the peak in the right side of the histogram? I wish the screener who screened it would have left a comment about something more specific. Thanks in advance. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8429726
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Looking for feedback on a long-shot with this photo. I want to know if it is lacking contrast and exposure as well as any other issues you might see. Thank you.

    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Looking for feedback on these two photos. I want to make sure everything is in order with them before I upload them. Thanks in advance.

    1) Are there any issues with color, exposure or contrast? Reddish color is from sky due to wildfire smoke overhead



    2) With this photo at a low shutter rate, are there any issues with softness. Also would this be considered backlit?



    If there are any other issues that I may have missed, I would appreciate it if you brought it to my attention. Thanks...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Would there be any objections in regards to contrast or exposure with this photo? Also are there any issues with any visible jpeg compression artifacts? Thank you

    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • I can understand the vignette and the exposure rejection, but what categories did I miss? I know for sure I checked military, but what other category did I miss? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8406567
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Seeking feedback on these three photos.

    1) contrast, exposure and if there are any sun glare issues on the tail?



    2) exposure and same as above if there are any issues with the sun glare on the tail



    3) any issues with contrast or exposure?



    Thank you in advance, please let me know if there are any issues I may have missed. Thanks...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Looking for feedback. I want to make sure this photo is sufficient with no visible compression artifacts, exposure is just right and to make sure the contrast is good too. If there are any other aspects of the photo that I may have missed, I would appreciate it being brought to my attention. Thank you

    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • For this edit, I based it off the angle of the base (squares and plaque) and those lines are slightly angled left so in retrospect, this would need CW rotation. The monument is on an incline as well as the road and the gas line rods that are sticking out of the ground. This one definitely tough to judge, but would you agree that based off the base that the plane sits on, it would now need CW rotation?
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • This is a fix for the rejection link I posted a day or two ago. CCW rotation and fixed the magenta hue. Please let me know if this resolves the issue. Thank you.

    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Looking for feedback on these two photos:

    1) Contrast, Exposure...Also to me, it looks borderline in regards to sunlight location, but I made sure where my spotting location was that the sun had not crossed parallel with the runway



    2) Contrast, Exposure, also worried about horizon



    If you noticed something I did not mention, I would appreciate that you bring it to my attention. Thank you...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:

No activity results to display
Show More
Working...
X