Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

User Profile

Collapse

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
bgkicks49
bgkicks49
Member
Last Activity: Yesterday, 02:42
Joined: 2019-05-16
Location: Minneapolis, MN
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • So I believe this was rejected for bad info on the aircraft type not whether it was private or not. So you put 'Cessna 560XL Citation XLS' but clearly the aircraft is a Cessna 560XL Citation XLS Plus. This was rightfully rejected for wrong aircraft type...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Looking for feedback on this photo. I worry that there might be some softness in the photo while applying my usual sharpness settings. Please do let me know if there are any other issues with the photo. Thank you.

    Also if you are able to provide feedback on the operator, this aircraft is operated by CHRISTIANSEN AVIATION, but there are Tulsa Community College markings, not sure which one to go with for operator

    Thank you in advance

    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Taking advice and guidance from the both of you (thank you for that by the way) I have come up with this edit. I realize that the underside of the aircraft was not well lit and the upper fuselage blended into the overcast background. I went back and did a re-edit so that I was not working with what I had before and this is what I came up with earlier. I will take this as my last chance/last advice for this photo. Please let me know what you think.

    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Tried not to overdo it, but added some contrast to the photo in terms of adding highlights and decreasing shadows. Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks

    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • For photo #1 would it be safe to say that it would not be worth another photo or do you think that there is the off 'borderline' chance that this photo could become acceptable? In your professional opinion...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Looking for feedback on these two photos.

    1) Obviously will contrast be an issue for this photo? If you see anything else please let me know, but I believe exposure, white balance/color, and processing are all adequate and acceptable



    2) Main issue I am worried about is horizon. I believe that using the building verticals is what's key since I cannot rely the electrical poles



    If you see anything else that might cause a rejection, I would appreciate it if you brought it to my attention. Thank you very much in advance....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Not a screener, but from my perspective, this lacks contrast and shadows and also looks like the framing is incorrect. I think this sits high in the frame. Try using the fuselage as the centering point and center it that way. Hope this helps...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Hard to go off of those sometimes because a lot of the have LLCs which are basically holder names for ownership or owner by a bank. The flight school out of KSUS (Spirit of St Louis Airport) is Elite Aviation. Screener left a comment saying 'Elite Aviation' so I was going off of that.

    I have since emailed the proper team from JP to get to the bottom of this since Elite Aviation exists as an Airline but not as General Aviation and they are two different entities in the aviation world

    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Hello,
    I recently got this rejection for Bad Info for not putting 'Elite Aviation' as the operator. Well 'Elite Aviation' exists in 'Airline' operator not 'General Aviation' so I opted to use 'Private' since the 'Elite Aviation' in the database has only airliners and business jets associated with it and this 'Elite Aviation' only employs the use of general aviation aircraft. Would like some insight on how to approach this since it would not allow me to add Elite Aviation into the General Aviation operator category. Thanks in advance

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9422483...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Hello,

    I recently got this rejection for Bad Info for not putting 'Elite Aviation' as the operator. Well 'Elite Aviation' exists in 'Airline' operator not 'General Aviation' so I opted to use 'Private' since the 'Elite Aviation' in the database has only airliners and business jets associated with it and this 'Elite Aviation' only employs the use of general aviation aircraft. Would like some insight on how to approach this since it would not allow me to add Elite Aviation into the General Aviation operator category. Thanks in advance

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9422483...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Went to the National Airline Museum today in Kansas City and they had on display Harrison Fords crashed Ryan ST3KR (NC5317. I am wondering if this edited photo meets the parameters for JetPhotos in regards to: Exposure, Contrast, Framing and also to make sure it does not look over edited.

    Also will I need to submit as NC53178 or N53178

    and

    Will this need to be categorized as Small Prop, Accident and/or Vintage/Warbird?

    Thank you

    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:

No activity results to display
Show More
Working...
X