User Profile

[LX-A343]

Different reg, with no other photos in the db. The reg isn't visible on the helo. So either we got screwed, or .......

[LX-A343]

Both look much better now....

[LX-A343]

They look OK to me....

[LX-A343]

they look acceptable to me...

[LX-A343]

Same again: soft, a bit noisy, lacks contrast....

[LX-A343]

if you want us to pre-screen a photo, please post the photo you intend to upload. A RAW photo will not be pre-screened....

[LX-A343]

lacks contrast, slightly leaning to the left and there is something weird you did to the engine....

[LX-A343]

blurry, soft, noise...

[LX-A343]

Depends. Could you post it here?...

[LX-A343]

It would be easier to answer that, if we could see an example....

[LX-A343]

I would accept it, others will maybe reject it. I give fair chances of being accepted....

[LX-A343]

I see no difference to the previously pre-screened photo regarding the quality issues....

[LX-A343]

None of them will be accepted. Main culprits: soft, noise, overexposed and lacking shadows. #1 and 3 have the wheels half cluttered....

[LX-A343]

no chance. soft and lacking contrast, which makes the photo look even softer...

[LX-A343]

Both look acceptable...

[LX-A343]

backlit, soft...

[LX-A343]

1) Bad info: aircraft (not a Boeing 747-212B(SF))
2) was also rejected for heat distortion. Missing category: Special scheme...

[LX-A343]

odds are not looking good: soft and lacking contrast...

[LX-A343]

No chance at all: blurry, noisy, badly framed just to start with....

[LX-A343]

1, 2, 4) oversharpened (check the nose on both)
3) OK (maybe a tad oversaturated)
5) Backlit...