User Profile

[LX-A343]

I for one would go with 2 or 3....

[LX-A343]

1) soft, lack of contrast, unlevel
2) lack of contrast...

[LX-A343]

1) now it is overexposed and soft, contrast too harsh, the chopped off tip of the stabilizer a bit too distracting
2) overexposed, contrast too harsh, noisy...

[LX-A343]

Slightly soft and dark. Unfortunately also obstructed by the stab of the aircraft in front....

[LX-A343]

Photo looks acceptable to me....

[LX-A343]

You’re welcome....

[LX-A343]

As far as I know, gliders don't have engines at all. So, "Small Prop" would not apply as well. A photo of a glider does not need any aircraft specific category....

[LX-A343]

Maybe a touch soft, but I would accept it....

[LX-A343]

For both photos: aircraft is too high in the frame. And both photos are killed by lack of contrast....

[LX-A343]

we don't have a "Glider" category.

[LX-A343]

Poor contrast on all of them....

[LX-A343]

Looks OK for me...

[LX-A343]

On one hand, the shadows are too dark and lacking details, on the other hand the photo has clipped highlights....

[LX-A343]

The photos have still not been loaded properly. I can't see them...

[LX-A343]

Soft and patches with heat distortion...

[LX-A343]

2) borderline, but I would accept it
1, 3, 4) lack of contrast...

[LX-A343]

Too soft, unfortunately....

[LX-A343]

1) soft, heat distortion
2) OK
3) borderline soft
4) heat distortion
5) soft, heat distortion...

[LX-A343]

They look better now. #4 is borderline noisy though....

[LX-A343]

weak contrast: photo lacks contrast....