User Profile

[LX-A343]

Nope, it is not....

[LX-A343]

I would appeal it. There isn't much you can loose here and the photo has a chance to be accepted on appeal....

[LX-A343]

1) backlit, contrast
2) contrast...

[LX-A343]

If it is the same G-AREI as we have in the db, just enter the reg in the autofill field. I just tried it.

[LX-A343]

Blurry, noisy...

[LX-A343]

You can try it, but some screeners may reject it for being a bit noisy and soft....

[LX-A343]

They would be rejected for similar....

[LX-A343]

1, 2) slightly soft and overexposed
3) OK...

[LX-A343]

1) blurry, noisy
2, 3) soft...

[LX-A343]

Soft and lacking contrast...

[LX-A343]

Most important on such subjects is the light. Try to have the sun really behind you....

[LX-A343]

They all look OK here....

[LX-A343]

1) heat distortion soft
2) OK
3) Backlit...

[LX-A343]

If the livery is considerably different (as a rule of thumb: difference visible in the thumbnail), it is not similar....

[LX-A343]

You will have to decide for one of them....

[LX-A343]

Mainly too dark...

[LX-A343]

None of them are acceptable (noise, blurry, soft, lack of contrast, ...)...

[LX-A343]

Thanks for bringing them up. I forwarded the topic to the admins.

He's a live-less prick who posted a bunch of these comments in the past few days....

[LX-A343]

The photo is heat distorted and soft. I doubt it can be fixed....

[LX-A343]

Looks a bit underexposed and seems to have a bit of a green-ish colour cast....