User Profile

[Christian K]

I have worked on the Cessna (potential Hot-Photo as there is no picture yet of the new registration (it was recently re-registered) on JetPhotos. I hope the halos (e.g. above the turbine ?) are now better, as I am afraid that if I go down further with structure and contrast the picture become too soft.

Regards,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks for the quick turn-around. I dare saying that I struggle with the "overprocessed". I cannot see clear signs of overprocessing (e.g. halos). Can you please give me a hint ? That would help me adding contrast and reducing the softness, which might potentiate signs of overprocessing.

Thanks again,
Christian

[Christian K]

Thanks dlowwa,

I made some changes to the eddid (adding subtle structure and contrast [hoping to avoid overprocessing] and hope this looks better now. One thing was rotating both planes back to the angle in the original photo, in order to get rid of jaggies.

Regards and have a good weekend,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks - will skip that one then.

Can you please have a look at these two busines jets landing at Zürich today ? Contrast ? Angle ? Over-processed ?

1) Cessna
2) Embraer

Thanks,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks - would this re-edit be more acceptable ?

Regards,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks - would this one at parking position be more acceptable ?

Regards,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks for the comment and hit - appreciated.

what about thos two props then:

1) PC-12: contrast ? add a little light ?
2) Antonov An-2: too intense (comparable with other photos on JP, thought) ?

Regards,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks for your comments.

any thoughts about this PC-12 landing at Engadin Airport (sharpness, too dark) ? This would be considered a small prop, but not a business jet, right ?

Regards,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks dlowwa and Hapy New Year !

May I kindly ask you to review those two pics that I took yesterday:

1) VistaJet 9H-VFC: too soft ? contrast ?
2) M-FINE: light ? this plane is privately owned - would it still be considered a business jet ?

Regards,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks dlowwa,

I think I found a way to reduce the halos (not getting the photos to soft, I hope). Would you agree ?

Regards and Happy New Year,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks for the speedy review.

1) I added some light and hope is not overprocessed now
2) Reduced some of the minor editing. Would there still be signs overprocessing ?

Regards,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks dlowwa - that saves us a lot of time.

Please find attached 2 more pictures I kindly ask you to review (taken at the same morning) - noise ? softness ?

1) UNITED
2) Cessna

Thanks and kind regards,
Christian...

[Christian K]

thanks dlowwa for your speedy reviview.

I amended the UA photo and hope it would be approvable now.

Regards,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks dlowwa. I reduced some sharpening and submitted.

Can you please have a look at these 2 newly processed photos, both early morning arrivals at ZRH:

1) Finnair: Contrast ? Noise ? Lack of darkness ?
2) UA Star Alliance: Noise ?

Anything else ?

Many thanks,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks for the advice dlowwa, I will refrain from working on photos taken under foggy conditions, too difficult to fix.

May I kindly ask you to have an expert look at these 2 photos, recently taken at a sunny day at Engadin Airport:

1) OK-XLS Business Jet
2) HB-KHC Private Prop

Thanks and kind regards,
Christian...

[Christian K]

Thanks dlowwa for the feed-back and Happy Holidays also to you !

1) I removed everything in LRC that I think can lead to jaggies. There is still a small amount of it, getting more pronounced when doing the export. Do you have any recomendations for a propper export. These are the vallues I use:

1. JPEG
2. Quality: 100
3. Resize -> Long edge 1280
4. Sharpen for Screen
5. Amount: Standard

2) Added more light and some contrast. If this is not it, then I think it cannot be fixed.

Regards,
Christian...