Hot photos issue

[Charlie Chang]

Ok, thanks for your checking. I wish you have a good day. ...

[Charlie Chang]

Again, thanks for your friendly advice of improving colour of this photo.
The issue of color just been solved, but I don't understand why a new rejection just added of this photo, I am very surprised about it.
If the rejection is correct, I think the screener who reject my photo first time should give me this rejection as well.
Do you think this photo is worth appeal or not, I wish you could give me some advice about it, thank you very much.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10482675...

[Charlie Chang]

Thanks for your attention! Could you help me to check for this photo as well, because I think the accepted photo and my photo was in the queue at the same time.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10523065...

[Charlie Chang]

Yes I agree with you , but I think they were in the queue at the same time. Thanks for your comment.

[Charlie Chang]

Today I took photo of B-6367 for twice, and I uploaded of this aircraft for six times, all of them got rejected.
I have no complaints about the first five rejections, and I appreciate the comments from the central reviewers to improve the quality of the images.
But when I was rejected for the last time, I was quite surprised.
The last time it was rejected, it went to the voting system. Because the first reviewer might think there's something wrong with this picture, but it's obviously not invalid hot. And I'm pretty sure that in the six times I uploaded a photo of the plane, there was no photo of the new livery on the plane in the database.
I wish staff member could check for this and give me explanation of this issue, much thanks to our friendly Jetphotos crew.
Link of 1st time of B-6367 photo got rejected:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10519091
Link of 2nd time of B-6367 photo got rejected:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?...

[Charlie Chang]

Large thanks for your suggestion.
I decreased the contrast of this photo, the contrast issue has been solved.
But I don't understand I only changed the contrast of the photo but it causes further rejection.
What is the standard of compression rejection, do this photo is still possible to fix to make it accepted?
Link of the rejected photo:https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10477084...

[Charlie Chang]

I am ready to appeal this photo because I think this photo was rejected by mistake,
Is this photo really soft or not?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10472500

[Charlie Chang]

I totally agree with your opinion, because airport photo is also available to see in FR24....

[Charlie Chang]

No worries, everyone is possible to have mistakes.
Thanks for your support to me with pre-screening my photos!...

[Charlie Chang]

Thank you very much for pre-screening!
Anyhow, the photo3 still rejected by Invalid Hot
So, is it still possible to upload the photos that only know the serial number as hot in the future?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10505881

In addition, I think even priority screening will not bring benefit to FR24, but I think this will bring benefit to JP's data list, many users use JP for searching aviation data and photos....

[Charlie Chang]

Can anyone pre-screen these photos? Thanks!

About photo 3, I know the serial number of this aircraft, but there is no Registration of this aircraft yet. Is photo 3 can consider as hot photo? Because there is no photo of this serial number and this aircraft in database....

[Charlie Chang]

Thank you very much...

[Charlie Chang]

Thank you very much for your pre-screening!
Is photo3's contrast too strong?
About photo4, Is it possible to not get rejection obstructed if I mark this photo as art photo category?...

[Charlie Chang]

Can anyone pre-screen these photos? Thanks!...

[Charlie Chang]

I agree with your opinion, but in most cases when the bad weather photo will be only rejected by contrast rejection. Not contrast + bad quality
Hope this situation will be change in the future...

[Charlie Chang]

I have no idea about this photo not showing in FR24 as well
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10710346

[Charlie Chang]

Too much or too little contrast is the most common rejection in Jetphotos, but from the perspective of photographer, I think this rejection should split to 3 rejections
1:High contrast
2:Low contrast
3:Light condition not good enough or Poor weather condition

Here are the following reasons that I think JP should add extra rejection of contrast.
1:Many photographer confuse about photo's contrast is too high or low, I think giving a high or low contrast will not give more pressure on photo screeners.

2:In JP, some photo with bad weather condition will be rejected by too much or too little contrast as well. But in some cases, the weather is not good, but it is also not very bad. If the photo got rejected for once by too much or too little contrast rejection. The photographer may increase or decrease the contrast of the photo then upload it again. But in fact the photo screener think the weather is bad then giving this photo a contrast rejection....

[Charlie Chang]

I decrease the contrast and upload this photo again, and it still reject by contrast rejection
Is this photo's contrast still too strong or I decrease the contrast of this photo too much?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10492673...

[Charlie Chang]

Thanks for your suggestion!...

[Charlie Chang]

Could anyone give some suggestions of this photo
The contrast is too strong or too low?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10492601