Concerns about double rejections

[Swisse]

Yea i do understand why my second one in queue was rejected, but how come my third one also got rejected? I waited so that the first and second one in queue are rejected (therefore not in queue anymore), then i put my third one in queue? Does this kind of situation kinds of double upload too? If so, how long will i have to wait until i can put that photo up in queue so that it will be screened normally? Thanks.

[Swisse]

Understood, and i am sorry that i was a bit too arrogant in my statements....

[Swisse]

Good morning/evening Jetphotos crew, recently, I’ve upload a photo in queue, and I made a mistake accidentally which I uploaded twice of that photo with slight editing difference to the queue, and of course, both were rejected for double uploads, that I absolutely understand. However, I waited and made sure that both photos were no longer in the queue, and uploaded it for a third time, which surprised me, as it was also rejected for the same reason. I wonder why was it the case when the 2 photos beforehand are already not the in the queue anymore, and I’m sure that i didn’t upload the same photo in the queue again, and I still received that as a rejected reason? Thanks for your time.

Note: I’ve CLEARLY read the thread about the double upload guidelines. Yet, I fail to gain any useful info for my current situation.

link of the first rejection is already expired unfortunately, but the photo of the rejected email I received is included below....

[Swisse]

The museum have rebuilt the aircraft and gave it a new registration. Therefore, "N-102" is the actual registration.

[Swisse]

Hello, i would like to argue that although the same plane is uploaded to JetPhotos, its in a different registration. Compared to other photos in the database, its clearly shown that mine had a totally different livery, therefore a different registration, just like an old commercial plane changing its airlines therefore received a new registration. The web page of the museum can also prove that they have got the ownership of the plane and had given it a new livery, as the owner was changed, a new registration "N-102" was given. Thus, i believe a first registration badge should be given in this scenario. Can you please check again?

[Swisse]

Hello JetPhotos crew, I uploaded this hot photo of N-102, which is a warplane that is first in Jetphotos, therefore being a first registration. I'm aware of the fact that "N-102" is a duplicate registration, but "N-102" registered to this aircraft is a first on Jetphotos. I believe i should be given a first registration badge. Link is below. Thanks! https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10109829
...

[Swisse]

Oh im sorry i just put it in queue to check dustspots but forgot to remove it. Now i removed it do you mind to check it again please?...

[Swisse]

Hello JetPhotos crew, may i ask can i tick special scheme for this plane im the photo? (Please ignore the editting at the moment) As in flightradar24 it doesn't show the livery for this name, however, for other planes with the same livery in the same airlines have the livery name, eg PK-GHG. It certainly suits the category for special scheme too. I would really want to get the 50 special scheme badge. Thanks!...

[Swisse]

Hello JetPhotos crew, may i ask if this photo have jpg compression problems please? I've been rejected for that particular reason for quite a few times, can you please help me have a check? Thanks....

[Swisse]

Hello JetPhotos crew, i've spot a plane and would like it to upload to hot photos as its a new registration. however, i failed to find any info online(serial number, specific plane type, all i know is that its a b747-400sf) of the aircraft, nor the auto fill in function of JetPhotosworked . The plane simply doesn't exist in the internet. May I ask what could i do or can you give me those information please?
Airlines: Rubystar airlines Aircraft registration: EW-566TQ...