Duplicate manufacturer

[JuklicekCZ]

Have a nice vacation ...

[JuklicekCZ]

Thanks, she is accepted....

[JuklicekCZ]

thanks, decent sounds good ...

[JuklicekCZ]

The stairs would also be an issue, thus I guess it would definitely be rejected for obstruction.

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello,
Recently I have met this aircraft at a flying competition.
I have already searched through everywhere, but I did not manage to find any information about the model.
Everywhere included the competitions web site where I found the aircraft the model was just titled as "Pája" wich supposedly is the machines nickname.
I really have no clue about the maker, whether it is some kit or whether it is some kind of a home build from scratch.
Does anyone have an idea how to fill the form for this photo?
Thanks.

[JuklicekCZ]

And would the chance be anyhow significant, or are there any potential issues?
Anyway, please only comment the mustang as I already have processed another shot of the tecnam....

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello,
Would these have a chance?...

[JuklicekCZ]

found out, that there is a duplicate Let-Mont aircraft company in the form.
There is a "Let Mont" and "Let-Mont" while the latter one is the correct option as it also offers more aircraft.
Could anyone please double check that and correct?
Thanks...

[JuklicekCZ]

Indeed, even though I have added quite a bit, it did not seem too much noticeable, but maybe it is caused by my workflow.
I was adding the sharpening in ligthroom into the RAW file with use of approximately 90% masking.
Is there a a better way how to?
I have tried also to sharpen the already down-scaled exported jpeg, but it seemed to methat the shot was then quite terrible right after the import without any sharpening.
Shall I then be sharpening the shots after importing jpeg as a DNG or is there a better way?...

[JuklicekCZ]

Ok, thank you,
Tried adding more texture and sharpening in lightroom, is this ok?
Are there any other potential borderline issues....

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, please don't take this offensively, I would just like to discuss a rejection.
I have received this rejection for being soft.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10504065
To be honest this photo was rejected twice, first was rejected for missing C/N even-though, C/N is optional parameter, but ok, however it did not anyhow mention sharpness.
So I accepted the C/N problem and uploaded it again with the C/N but it got rejected because of being soft.
Thus I wanted to ask, whether the soft rejection is correct as to me it did not seem too soft to be an issue also with respect to the fact, that it is a first registration and the first rejection did not mention it.
If it is a problem would it be acceptable in a lower resolution?

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, I'm a bit unsure here.
From my point of view, this L-39 was indeed made as a ZA variant with respect to the FAA registers, however, the difference between ZA and C is mostly, that C is a trainer variant, and ZA is additionally equipped with under-wing pylons to fit bombs and external cannon.
However, when sold to private individuals, the aircraft should be de-militarized, thus no guns can be fitted anymore, while the capability to carry weapons is the whole point of the Z marking. Shouldn't that then be considered as a conversion/downgrade to the C variant?...

[JuklicekCZ]

Thanks and what about these?
Here the CASA is lit much more....

[JuklicekCZ]

Thanks, would this one be better?
It is a subseuent shot....

[JuklicekCZ]

For 4 and 5, borderline too little?...

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello, would these shots have any chance to be accepted?
Thanks....

[JuklicekCZ]

Sharpening to max will definitely not work.
There indeed is a rejection for over sharpening as sharpening too much causes issues with artefacts and that may even be nowhere near to max.
Also sharpening may increase nose, so you may even run into too much noise rejection....

[JuklicekCZ]

The size and aspect ratio must remain the same for re-upload....

[JuklicekCZ]

To me, the aircraft seems to be backlit, which would be an issue.
It also is poorly centered....

[JuklicekCZ]

From my point of view, the crop is about the missing part of the prop and the horizontal stabilizer, not wing. Removing the string in an after edit might cause a digital manipulation issue.
But as I said, I'm not a screenerer....