Help with US Army Apache Regs

[jakerepp]

As has been said, it's a light colored aircraft and cloudy day so the contrast is quite flat and that usually doesn't work on JetPhotos....

[jakerepp]

No problem. I increased exposure a little more and it was accepted, as was the first of the two above. Haven't tried the second one yet....

[jakerepp]

Likely not workable due to poor light conditions.

[jakerepp]

Just on the two attached, or the rejected as well?...

[jakerepp]

How far off is this one from being okay? Was my second attempt at it as I figured the first one was borderline (at least to me, based on the previous two I had like it that been accepted).

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10929680

And could you also pre-screen on these last two from that set?

Thanks...

[jakerepp]

Thank you both.

What resource do you pull the c/n from? Or is it something that can be figured out based on the registration?...

[jakerepp]

Can you pre-screen these? I feel unsure about the exposure on them. I think my monitor settings got screwed up or my eyes are deceiving me or something cause I had a rejection earlier that only made sense when I looked at it on my phone and saw that it was indeed too dark....

[jakerepp]

Can someone help me decipher the registrations on this one? It's one of 5 that were at Scottsdale today. All I can see is 95577 but I don't believe that is correct based on others in the DB.

Would it be 09-05577?...

[jakerepp]

Do you agree with this rejection?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10881991

[jakerepp]

Yeah it's still the same way on desktop. But it works fine on the mobile site....

[jakerepp]

Thanks as always!...

[jakerepp]

I've got a few more for pre-screening that are unusual in some way and they're throwing me off.

AA 321 - not sure if the shadows it hurt in some way. I just liked how it looked.

Boneyard 320 - Exposure/obstruction? Not sure if boneyard shot obstructions are viewed differently

Blimp - Never uploaded a blimp so I just don't know. Might be dark

Small prop - background too blown out?

Oh also, this rejection expires tomorrow but I just thought I'd have your opinion. I thought it was sharp enough but maybe a little noisy.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10831012...

[jakerepp]

Same thing for me for photos I've uploaded after the 22nd of February. Not sure why. Someone made a post about this in the Site Specific forum. No response from the editors yet....

[jakerepp]

Not a screener, but I definitely think I've seen plenty of crops like this.

Here's a similar one showing up on the front page under 'Latest Photos'
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10878326

Not going to comment on any other qualities, but it's a cool looking photo....

[jakerepp]

Ah, thanks Erwin...

[jakerepp]

Hi Editors,

I have a photo of a new type. I'm trying to add the type but am not able to as the type and model autofills with the only existing model of that manufacturer in the DB. I can't seem to get rid of that. What am I doing wrong? I already submitted the request with the correct model in the custom field but the existing model was autofilled as well and it was rejected.

The new type is 'Airplane Factory Sling TSi' and the reg is N2066T...

[jakerepp]

Do these crops work?

Also for the Piper, I was shooting through a fence and would've sworn I got some of the fence wire in the shots but I don't see it now. Do you see fence wire in it anywhere?...

[jakerepp]

Pre-screening please. Thinking it might be too dark as well....

[jakerepp]

Not a screener.

Fuselage looks a bit low....

[jakerepp]

When you say the full res image looks oversharpened now, do you mean what you are looking at while its in Photoshop/Lightroom?...