Gotcha.
These were taken the same day with the same camera. Do they also have this issue?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10916029
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10916050...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
User Profile
Collapse
-
Morning, all.
Just curious what the specifics of this rejection are. The exposure was increased minimally, sharpness moderately, and only a touch of contrast. Is it salvageable with a different edit?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10912185
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for the reply. While I understand this would be manipulation, I struggle to see why that rule applies to faces. If editing a photo to create the same result as taking the photo in a longer exposure, why can't it be allowed? Nothing else is being changed. I get it if I were adding or removing things from the picture, but if it creates the exact same result, I fail to see the problem.
Not to mention, there is a clear inconsistency with the rules. I've seen countless photos in the database with faces visible. Here are just a few examples:
ZYHB | Airport | Terminal | StevenN | JetPhotos
ZGSZ | Airport | Terminal | UniverseLin | JetPhotos
KRIC | Airport | Terminal | FR24 | JetPhotos...
Leave a comment:
-
Thank you for the information. What if I blurred their faces?...
Leave a comment:
-
Why? The photo highlights the sleek design of the airport’s new terminal. It also features the sign “Welcome to Terminal A.” The sign’s placement was intentional to indicate that this terminal is the start of a new EWR....
Leave a comment:
-
Would this photo of the new Terminal A at EWR be acceptable?...
Leave a comment:
No activity results to display
Show More
Leave a comment: