Search:

Type: Posts; User: LX-A343

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.06 seconds.

  1. Thread: upload limit

    by LX-A343
    Replies
    1
    Views
    560

    As of now, there are no more steps. Some former...

    As of now, there are no more steps. Some former JP Elite members and crew members have a higher limit.
  2. Replies
    404
    Views
    20,688

    regarding...

    regarding https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7597176 : Contrast is tricky, as it shows a white aircraft against an overcast sky. If the clouds had some structure in it, then chances would...
  3. Replies
    15
    Views
    939

    Looks OK. Maybe double check the horizon again...

    Looks OK. Maybe double check the horizon again before uploading.
  4. Replies
    217
    Views
    7,931

    2: looks overexposed the rest: OK

    2: looks overexposed
    the rest: OK
  5. Replies
    3
    Views
    368

    Yep, that's an obstruction.

    Yep, that's an obstruction.
  6. Replies
    180
    Views
    7,943

    No worries. Just keep trying, keep uploading....

    No worries. Just keep trying, keep uploading. What's the worst which could happen? A photo could be rejected, so what?
  7. Replies
    179
    Views
    8,976

    Both a bot too soft and slightly clipped...

    Both a bot too soft and slightly clipped highlights. Should be easy o fix.
  8. No chance, backlit.

    No chance, backlit.
  9. Replies
    159
    Views
    5,423

    1: borderline dark, I would accept it 2: OK 3:...

    1: borderline dark, I would accept it
    2: OK
    3: OK
    4: a tad overexposed
    5: OK
  10. Replies
    55
    Views
    3,059

    They look OK. The classic side-on shots 2 and 4...

    They look OK. The classic side-on shots 2 and 4 would look better, if you left some more space on the left and on the right side of the aircraft.
  11. Replies
    180
    Views
    7,943

    All of them borderline shots, some even screened...

    All of them borderline shots, some even screened by the same screeners. On the positive side the photos show a great sunset, on the negative side, the aircraft are poorly lit, the photos are not...
  12. Replies
    180
    Views
    7,943

    Backlight per se is smething to avoid in...

    Backlight per se is smething to avoid in photography. However, there are instances, where backlight can add a lot to a photo. In such cases, as stated in the upload guidelines, we might accept the...
  13. Looks OK, maybe borderline clipped highlights....

    Looks OK, maybe borderline clipped highlights. Better be safe and check the histogram again.
  14. Replies
    404
    Views
    20,688

    The whole photo looks great, with exception of...

    The whole photo looks great, with exception of the darkest shadows on the wheels and parts of the right wing. If that was shot in RAW, then there is no problem to adjust it with the raw converter to...
  15. Replies
    354
    Views
    13,145

    as the fuselage is a round cigar, depending on...

    as the fuselage is a round cigar, depending on the relative position of the sun, a small part can be lit by the sun, whil a large part of the same side is in its shadow. You took the photo from steep...
  16. Replies
    65
    Views
    2,431

    1, 2, 5: Look OK 3, 4: borderline overexposed....

    1, 2, 5: Look OK
    3, 4: borderline overexposed. In addition, cropping is a bit too tight. The photos would greatly benefit if you leave some space around the aircraft.
  17. Replies
    217
    Views
    7,931

    Look OK for me. #2 is maybe a tad dark, but -...

    Look OK for me. #2 is maybe a tad dark, but - again - OK for me.
  18. Replies
    354
    Views
    13,145

    Most of the aircraft is in its own shadow, so IMO...

    Most of the aircraft is in its own shadow, so IMO correctly rejected. In addition, the are slight halos around the aircraft, hence the rejection also for overprocessing.
  19. Replies
    272
    Views
    13,963

    2: a bit soft the rest: looks OK

    2: a bit soft
    the rest: looks OK
  20. Replies
    77
    Views
    3,421

    Again tack sharp! The only 2 things I notice: -...

    Again tack sharp! The only 2 things I notice:
    - borderline contrast (background is a bit washed out)
    - nose seems to have a slight halo

    Not sure, if that would warrant a rejection, but if you...
  21. Replies
    138
    Views
    5,253

    1: still a bit soft 2: unlevel, soft both look...

    1: still a bit soft
    2: unlevel, soft
    both look as if you applied too much noise reducing
  22. Replies
    137
    Views
    7,079

    Both a bit soft and slightly heat distorted (1 a...

    Both a bit soft and slightly heat distorted (1 a little bit more than 2)
  23. Replies
    54
    Views
    2,566

    1 and 3: soft, green-ish colour cast 2: slightly...

    1 and 3: soft, green-ish colour cast
    2: slightly dark, borderline soft
  24. Replies
    15
    Views
    842

    1: bordeline dark, unlevel 2, 3: soft, unlevel...

    1: bordeline dark, unlevel
    2, 3: soft, unlevel
    4: lacks some shadows
  25. Replies
    49
    Views
    1,932

    All 4 borderline soft.

    All 4 borderline soft.
  26. Replies
    138
    Views
    5,253

    The helo is definitely too soft. The Cirrus...

    The helo is definitely too soft. The Cirrus should be good enough, maybe the noise will be a challenge.
  27. Replies
    54
    Views
    2,566

    "IMO irrecoverable" means "In my opinion the...

    "IMO irrecoverable" means "In my opinion the photo can not be recovered", or in other words "it can not be fixed"
  28. Replies
    159
    Views
    5,423

    Looks OK

    Looks OK
  29. Replies
    54
    Views
    2,566

    1: blurry, soft, lacks contrast 2: OK 3: dark,...

    1: blurry, soft, lacks contrast
    2: OK
    3: dark, backlit. IMO irrecoverable
  30. Replies
    77
    Views
    3,421

    A bit too dark. If you can brighten it up to get...

    A bit too dark. If you can brighten it up to get some more details in the shadows, it would improve the photo by a huge margin. Other than that: nice photo, tack sharp.
  31. Replies
    3
    Views
    438

    You had 7 SCREENER INFOS in the past telling you...

    You had 7 SCREENER INFOS in the past telling you to select Night Shot for photos with sunset light. Up to you.
  32. A bit better, but still a bit too high.

    A bit better, but still a bit too high.
  33. No, it's not that easy. Your 3 photos are all...

    No, it's not that easy. Your 3 photos are all showing a dull aircraft with a dark grey background. I tried a few things in Photoshop with your photos, but I would drop them.
  34. Replies
    96
    Views
    4,875

    Most possibly a rejection for obstruction.

    Most possibly a rejection for obstruction.
  35. Replies
    119
    Views
    5,908

    Open...

    Open https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7576246 in your editor and equalize the photo. You will suddenly see the halos. It looks to me as if you used some auto-adjusting features...
  36. Replies
    6
    Views
    555

    There doesn't seem to be an attachement in your...

    There doesn't seem to be an attachement in your post. Maybe try to upload it again.
  37. Replies
    440
    Views
    22,544

    In my opinion the glare kills the photo.

    In my opinion the glare kills the photo.
  38. Replies
    119
    Views
    5,908

    I don't think, the blurriness can be fixed in...

    I don't think, the blurriness can be fixed in these two photos. Regarding the over processing, without knowing your editing steps it's hard to tell you how to avoid the halos.
  39. Replies
    19
    Views
    2,327

    What I think? I'm glad you're not a screener. ...

    What I think? I'm glad you're not a screener.

    Why do you think it should have been rejected?
  40. Replies
    112
    Views
    4,642

    Both look OK here.

    Both look OK here.
Results 1 to 40 of 500
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4