Search:

Type: Posts; User: dlowwa

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.06 seconds.

  1. Replies
    1
    Views
    106

    Your new edit would be rejected for vignetting...

    Your new edit would be rejected for vignetting and heat haze, and possibly cut off (tight crop on left) and horizon (CW needed). Vignetting is easily visible on the whole left side, but especially...
  2. Replies
    1
    Views
    98

    Hello, Please read here thoroughly,...

    Hello,

    Please read here thoroughly, especially #4

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?61627-Suggestions-when-asking-for-editing-advice-prescreening-from-crew

    Your previous thread:
    ...
  3. Replies
    194
    Views
    7,045

    In the air vs. on the ground. Both are in the air...

    In the air vs. on the ground. Both are in the air = similar.
  4. Vegetation. If the tail is fully in...

    Vegetation.



    If the tail is fully in shadow, then we consider it backlit. It can't be fixed.
  5. Replies
    11
    Views
    471

    Likely a personal decision for the crop; white...

    Likely a personal decision for the crop; white balance also looks a bit warm.
  6. Replies
    31
    Views
    1,319

    No. Quality looks ok, but not really sure...

    No.



    Quality looks ok, but not really sure the composition is justified.
  7. Replies
    194
    Views
    7,045

    Indeed, the gap on the right edge clearly shows...

    Indeed, the gap on the right edge clearly shows underexposure.



    Same side, same stage of flight. Similar guidelines were updated a few years ago, you might want to review them.
  8. Replies
    301
    Views
    9,306

    Aperture settings have nothing to do with editing...

    Aperture settings have nothing to do with editing halos such as that. They are caused either by in-camera settings or editing functions like de-haze, clarity, shadow/highlight, etc..
  9. Replies
    52
    Views
    2,158

    Halos are not an issue, but contrast is not very...

    Halos are not an issue, but contrast is not very good.
  10. Obstructed and backlit.

    Obstructed and backlit.
  11. Replies
    96
    Views
    2,530

    Acceptable.

    Acceptable.
  12. You would need to contact each photographer...

    You would need to contact each photographer individually and obtain their permission to use their photos.
  13. Replies
    99
    Views
    25,540

    Sticky: Other Location.

    Other Location.
  14. Replies
    6
    Views
    452

    1. dark, soft 2-3, yes similar. please pick one.

    1. dark, soft
    2-3, yes similar. please pick one.
  15. Replies
    141
    Views
    6,037

    Exposure should be ok, but maybe a touch too soft...

    Exposure should be ok, but maybe a touch too soft for 1920pix.
  16. This would be rejected for cropping ratio, cut...

    This would be rejected for cropping ratio, cut off, centering, and color. Contrast is the least of your worries with this image.
  17. Replies
    62
    Views
    2,939

    This would be rejected for obstruction.

    This would be rejected for obstruction.
  18. Replies
    301
    Views
    9,306

    As with appeals, we ask that you not bring other...

    As with appeals, we ask that you not bring other photographers into the discussion. We are discussing your images, taken at different times, locations, and conditions than others.

    The latter...
  19. Replies
    62
    Views
    2,939

    Would be rejected for dark/blurry/noisy.

    Would be rejected for dark/blurry/noisy.
  20. Replies
    356
    Views
    15,174

    No, it is subjective. Being at an even higher...

    No, it is subjective. Being at an even higher latitude than you, I find that the long shadows/warm tones JP associates with the 'Night Shot' category usually occur here about an hour or so before...
  21. Replies
    110
    Views
    4,519

    Please read my comments again. The correct info...

    Please read my comments again. The correct info IS visible on the rejected image page, which means the bad info rejection was likely due to a bug at the time of screening, not because it was...
  22. Replies
    110
    Views
    4,519

    Not really sure either. Don't see any editing...

    Not really sure either. Don't see any editing halos or anything like that.




    Those are categories, and not related to bad info. It was rejected due to aircraft type and location, though since...
  23. Replies
    78
    Views
    2,929

    Yes.

    Yes.
  24. Replies
    96
    Views
    2,530

    Would be acceptable for me.

    Would be acceptable for me.
  25. Replies
    1
    Views
    139

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?19108-...

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?19108-Changing-my-photographer-name/page61
  26. As Geri is hinting at, all three would likely be...

    As Geri is hinting at, all three would likely be dark/contrast rejections. You might want to start with an image taken in decent light before adding/subtracting contrast to make your point.
  27. Replies
    1
    Views
    276

    Hello, Please read here thoroughly,...

    Hello,

    Please read here thoroughly, especially #4:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?61627-Suggestions-when-asking-for-editing-advice-prescreening-from-crew

    Your previous...
  28. Replies
    168
    Views
    7,238

    Yes. 1. vignetting, possibly horizon, but...

    Yes.

    1. vignetting, possibly horizon, but can't really tell
    2. soft, color, horizon
  29. Replies
    178
    Views
    4,000

    No, since unlike softness, you can't really fix...

    No, since unlike softness, you can't really fix blurry with more sharpening.
  30. Replies
    178
    Views
    4,000

    Contrast is improved yes, and halos are not an...

    Contrast is improved yes, and halos are not an issue, though as I said, there appear to be other problems as well. Aircraft actually appears a bit blurry to me.
  31. Replies
    96
    Views
    2,530

    Probably acceptable, though a little on the...

    Probably acceptable, though a little on the oversharpened side now for me.
  32. Replies
    178
    Views
    4,000

    Contrast is very washed out (among other issues)....

    Contrast is very washed out (among other issues). To start with, you'd need to really strengthen the darker tones.
  33. Replies
    62
    Views
    2,939

    I'd have considered your friend's image to be...

    I'd have considered your friend's image to be borderline to start with, and his is a much better edit, so there you go. Yours is also soft, besides the contrast issue, just to be aware.
  34. Replies
    96
    Views
    2,530

    First one is a bit soft, other two should be ok.

    First one is a bit soft, other two should be ok.
  35. To be frank, the contrast is terrible in all...

    To be frank, the contrast is terrible in all three images, and none would be acceptable.
  36. Replies
    6
    Views
    442

    Don't oversaturate it, nor lighten the shadows so...

    Don't oversaturate it, nor lighten the shadows so much. Looks very overprocessed.
  37. In the same way that similar images in the queue...

    In the same way that similar images in the queue are automatically rejected, if you re-upload a similar image to one you have appealed before the appeal is handled, the appeal will automatically...
  38. Replies
    163
    Views
    7,172

    I can still see where you've removed the dust,...

    I can still see where you've removed the dust, and still a bit contrasty, so yes.
  39. Replies
    253
    Views
    9,781

    That would almost certainly be a contrast...

    That would almost certainly be a contrast rejection.
  40. Replies
    134
    Views
    5,984

    Borderline soft, but would be acceptable for me.

    Borderline soft, but would be acceptable for me.
Results 1 to 40 of 500
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4