Search:

Type: Posts; User: dlowwa

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.06 seconds; generated 21 minute(s) ago.

  1. Replies
    99
    Views
    25,496

    Sticky: Other Location.

    Other Location.
  2. Replies
    6
    Views
    414

    1. dark, soft 2-3, yes similar. please pick one.

    1. dark, soft
    2-3, yes similar. please pick one.
  3. Replies
    141
    Views
    5,995

    Exposure should be ok, but maybe a touch too soft...

    Exposure should be ok, but maybe a touch too soft for 1920pix.
  4. This would be rejected for cropping ratio, cut...

    This would be rejected for cropping ratio, cut off, centering, and color. Contrast is the least of your worries with this image.
  5. Replies
    62
    Views
    2,899

    This would be rejected for obstruction.

    This would be rejected for obstruction.
  6. Replies
    295
    Views
    9,063

    As with appeals, we ask that you not bring other...

    As with appeals, we ask that you not bring other photographers into the discussion. We are discussing your images, taken at different times, locations, and conditions than others.

    The latter...
  7. Replies
    62
    Views
    2,899

    Would be rejected for dark/blurry/noisy.

    Would be rejected for dark/blurry/noisy.
  8. Replies
    356
    Views
    15,100

    No, it is subjective. Being at an even higher...

    No, it is subjective. Being at an even higher latitude than you, I find that the long shadows/warm tones JP associates with the 'Night Shot' category usually occur here about an hour or so before...
  9. Replies
    110
    Views
    4,485

    Please read my comments again. The correct info...

    Please read my comments again. The correct info IS visible on the rejected image page, which means the bad info rejection was likely due to a bug at the time of screening, not because it was...
  10. Replies
    110
    Views
    4,485

    Not really sure either. Don't see any editing...

    Not really sure either. Don't see any editing halos or anything like that.




    Those are categories, and not related to bad info. It was rejected due to aircraft type and location, though since...
  11. Replies
    78
    Views
    2,915

    Yes.

    Yes.
  12. Replies
    94
    Views
    2,449

    Would be acceptable for me.

    Would be acceptable for me.
  13. Replies
    1
    Views
    117

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?19108-...

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?19108-Changing-my-photographer-name/page61
  14. As Geri is hinting at, all three would likely be...

    As Geri is hinting at, all three would likely be dark/contrast rejections. You might want to start with an image taken in decent light before adding/subtracting contrast to make your point.
  15. Replies
    1
    Views
    244

    Hello, Please read here thoroughly,...

    Hello,

    Please read here thoroughly, especially #4:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?61627-Suggestions-when-asking-for-editing-advice-prescreening-from-crew

    Your previous...
  16. Replies
    168
    Views
    7,177

    Yes. 1. vignetting, possibly horizon, but...

    Yes.

    1. vignetting, possibly horizon, but can't really tell
    2. soft, color, horizon
  17. Replies
    178
    Views
    3,975

    No, since unlike softness, you can't really fix...

    No, since unlike softness, you can't really fix blurry with more sharpening.
  18. Replies
    178
    Views
    3,975

    Contrast is improved yes, and halos are not an...

    Contrast is improved yes, and halos are not an issue, though as I said, there appear to be other problems as well. Aircraft actually appears a bit blurry to me.
  19. Replies
    94
    Views
    2,449

    Probably acceptable, though a little on the...

    Probably acceptable, though a little on the oversharpened side now for me.
  20. Replies
    178
    Views
    3,975

    Contrast is very washed out (among other issues)....

    Contrast is very washed out (among other issues). To start with, you'd need to really strengthen the darker tones.
  21. Replies
    62
    Views
    2,899

    I'd have considered your friend's image to be...

    I'd have considered your friend's image to be borderline to start with, and his is a much better edit, so there you go. Yours is also soft, besides the contrast issue, just to be aware.
  22. Replies
    94
    Views
    2,449

    First one is a bit soft, other two should be ok.

    First one is a bit soft, other two should be ok.
  23. To be frank, the contrast is terrible in all...

    To be frank, the contrast is terrible in all three images, and none would be acceptable.
  24. Replies
    6
    Views
    432

    Don't oversaturate it, nor lighten the shadows so...

    Don't oversaturate it, nor lighten the shadows so much. Looks very overprocessed.
  25. In the same way that similar images in the queue...

    In the same way that similar images in the queue are automatically rejected, if you re-upload a similar image to one you have appealed before the appeal is handled, the appeal will automatically...
  26. Replies
    163
    Views
    7,100

    I can still see where you've removed the dust,...

    I can still see where you've removed the dust, and still a bit contrasty, so yes.
  27. Replies
    253
    Views
    9,718

    That would almost certainly be a contrast...

    That would almost certainly be a contrast rejection.
  28. Replies
    134
    Views
    5,969

    Borderline soft, but would be acceptable for me.

    Borderline soft, but would be acceptable for me.
  29. Replies
    163
    Views
    7,100

    Likely a dark/contrast rejection, and possibly...

    Likely a dark/contrast rejection, and possibly overprocessed/dirty for the poor dust removal below the nose as well.
  30. Replies
    189
    Views
    6,923

    Correct.

    Correct.
  31. First question is an easy fix. Somewhere in your...

    First question is an easy fix. Somewhere in your work flow there is a dialog box asking you which profile to assign. One of the versions you posted was indeed sRGB, which shows that it's completely...
  32. Replies
    14
    Views
    362

    Soft, dirty, and somewhat compressed - although...

    Soft, dirty, and somewhat compressed - although not nearly as badly as the previous versions.

    Don't use LR myself, so no idea what a '77' setting equates to, but I would certainly be using the...
  33. Replies
    39
    Views
    1,083

    1. oversharpened, overprocessed (editing halos)...

    1. oversharpened, overprocessed (editing halos)
    2. borderline oversharpened
    3-4 borderline contrast
    5. ok for me
  34. Replies
    246
    Views
    11,272

    1-2 soft 3. soft, contrast

    1-2 soft
    3. soft, contrast
  35. Replies
    99
    Views
    2,812

    A bit flat I suppose. Borderline on the first,...

    A bit flat I suppose. Borderline on the first, but the second would have been ok for me.
  36. Replies
    163
    Views
    4,095

    Soft, backlit, heat hazed. Backlit and heat hazed...

    Soft, backlit, heat hazed. Backlit and heat hazed cannot be fixed.



    Dark/contrast, and soft.
  37. Replies
    21
    Views
    1,082

    Looks soft/blurry towards the tail.

    Looks soft/blurry towards the tail.
  38. Replies
    163
    Views
    4,095

    Last time I am going to ask you, then I will...

    Last time I am going to ask you, then I will simply stop replying to your requests again. Please read here THOROUGHLY, especially #6 in this case:
    ...
  39. Replies
    14
    Views
    362

    Pixels per inch are for printing, and has no...

    Pixels per inch are for printing, and has no relevance for images intended for display digitally. You need to save at a higher quality/lower compression setting. The newer image is still heavily...
  40. Replies
    94
    Views
    2,449

    Quality would be acceptable for me.

    Quality would be acceptable for me.
Results 1 to 40 of 500
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4