Search:

Type: Posts; User: dlowwa

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.77 seconds; generated 31 minute(s) ago.

  1. Replies
    146
    Views
    5,684

    I'd still consider them borderline.

    I'd still consider them borderline.
  2. Replies
    18
    Views
    768

    First one should be acceptable, though there's...

    First one should be acceptable, though there's some light reflection/glare visible. Second one probably a motive rejection if I had to guess.
  3. Replies
    158
    Views
    5,753

    Yes.

    Yes.
  4. Replies
    167
    Views
    5,685

    A couple of them look a bit bright in spots, but...

    A couple of them look a bit bright in spots, but sharpening/processing wouldn't be an issue for me.
  5. Replies
    7
    Views
    638

    Very severe purple cast on whole image. I've...

    Very severe purple cast on whole image. I've corrected the left side for you to compare:

    29431
  6. Replies
    61
    Views
    2,879

    Without having see the original, I'd have to...

    Without having see the original, I'd have to guess the latter.
  7. Replies
    61
    Views
    2,879

    Whole aircraft is soft/blurry.

    Whole aircraft is soft/blurry.
  8. Replies
    2
    Views
    254

    Images are all heavily compressed, and would...

    Images are all heavily compressed, and would likely be rejected as such.
  9. Quality looks ok to me.

    Quality looks ok to me.
  10. Replies
    146
    Views
    5,684

    All three are oversaturated, with the second and...

    All three are oversaturated, with the second and third also have blue/green casts, respectively.
  11. Replies
    3
    Views
    349

    I've added the photo, but in the future better to...

    I've added the photo, but in the future better to come to the forum with such concerns before appealing, as they can be better dealt with here.
  12. Replies
    158
    Views
    5,753

    Should be ok; taking a second look now you might...

    Should be ok; taking a second look now you might also want to sharpen them a bit more to be safe ;)
  13. Replies
    146
    Views
    5,684

    Other than color, don't see any major issues.

    Other than color, don't see any major issues.
  14. Replies
    3
    Views
    218

    Hi, this would be rejected for noise and...

    Hi, this would be rejected for noise and contrast. Looks almost backlit, so probably not fixable.
  15. Replies
    160
    Views
    5,259

    1. soft, noisy, overexposed, dirty 2-5 soft,...

    1. soft, noisy, overexposed, dirty
    2-5 soft, overexposed, dirty
  16. Replies
    406
    Views
    20,858

    Borderline acceptable for me. Slight sharpening...

    Borderline acceptable for me. Slight sharpening or re-sizing should be enough.



    Link is broken.
  17. Replies
    61
    Views
    2,879

    Noisy and borderline contrast.

    Noisy and borderline contrast.
  18. Replies
    158
    Views
    5,753

    A bit green, yes, and night shot does apply. Also...

    A bit green, yes, and night shot does apply. Also somewhat soft.

    Also this was rejected for soft, do you believe it's fixable with more sharpening?
    29396[/QUOTE]

    Possibly, but probably needs a...
  19. Replies
    305
    Views
    16,417

    1. soft/heat hazed 2. backlit/borderline heat...

    1. soft/heat hazed
    2. backlit/borderline heat hazed
  20. Replies
    146
    Views
    5,684

    Both a bit dark; second also a bit yellow.

    Both a bit dark; second also a bit yellow.
  21. Replies
    7
    Views
    569

    If it doesn't show up as hot automatically (i.e....

    If it doesn't show up as hot automatically (i.e. isn't screened within 6+ hours), just delete it and reupload with comments in the 'Hot photo? Enter why:' box.
  22. Sure. Image would be rejected for soft/blurry,...

    Sure. Image would be rejected for soft/blurry, overprocessed, vignetting, contrast, and dirty (dust spot). The quality certainly isn't there for 1800pix, and I doubt that even a lower resolution...
  23. Replies
    99
    Views
    4,538

    Quality looks acceptable to me.

    Quality looks acceptable to me.
  24. Replies
    167
    Views
    5,685

    Contrast is ok, and maybe slightly low in the...

    Contrast is ok, and maybe slightly low in the frame, but bigger issues with compression and softness.
  25. I'd say please read here, and please keep your...

    I'd say please read here, and please keep your requests to your own thread:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?61627-Suggestions-when-asking-for-editing-advice-prescreening-from-crew
  26. All have multiple quality issues that I don't...

    All have multiple quality issues that I don't think you could fix with further editing. You can pick a particular image if you'd like more specific feedback, but not really worth the time for all of...
  27. Replies
    5
    Views
    479

    Yes, very likely a contrast rejection.

    Yes, very likely a contrast rejection.
  28. Replies
    18
    Views
    768

    If the aircraft you're in is prominent in the...

    If the aircraft you're in is prominent in the frame (as it is here), then use info for aircraft, not airport overview. The fact that the aircraft is pretty much completely out of focus could be an...
  29. Replies
    99
    Views
    4,538

    1. obstructed. don't submit. 2. add a bit more...

    1. obstructed. don't submit.
    2. add a bit more contrast
  30. Replies
    402
    Views
    18,517

    Motive: identifiable faces.

    Motive: identifiable faces.
  31. Contrast is a bit harsh, but would be ok for me.

    Contrast is a bit harsh, but would be ok for me.
  32. Replies
    50
    Views
    2,017

    The first one has issues with contrast and...

    The first one has issues with contrast and softness, but the others should be ok.
  33. Replies
    402
    Views
    18,517

    1. ok 2. soft/blurry 3. soft/heat haze/color...

    1. ok
    2. soft/blurry
    3. soft/heat haze/color
    4. motive
    5. borderline (harsh) contrast
  34. Replies
    138
    Views
    7,204

    They would be rejected, for contrast and...

    They would be rejected, for contrast and soft/blurry/noisy, respectively.
  35. Thread: pre-screen

    by dlowwa
    Replies
    181
    Views
    6,959

    1. borderline overprocessed (editing halos) 2....

    1. borderline overprocessed (editing halos)
    2. borderline color (orange cast)
    3. ok
    4. borderline soft
  36. Replies
    142
    Views
    6,654

    It's your image to do with as you wish, I'm just...

    It's your image to do with as you wish, I'm just giving advice to increase your chances of acceptance.
  37. Replies
    59
    Views
    2,769

    Some editing halos visible on the second.

    Some editing halos visible on the second.
  38. Replies
    5
    Views
    478

    A bit low in the frame, but otherwise should be...

    A bit low in the frame, but otherwise should be ok.
  39. Replies
    50
    Views
    2,017

    Sure, what would you like help with?

    Sure, what would you like help with?
  40. First one still borderline, but they'd be ok for...

    First one still borderline, but they'd be ok for me.
Results 1 to 40 of 494
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4