Search:

Type: Posts; User: bleuair

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.02 seconds.

  1. Replies
    218
    Views
    24,825

    Sticky: But if it were a privately owned bizjet, then it...

    But if it were a privately owned bizjet, then it would be correct? The registered owner is 606JL LLC and Mr. Ludwig is the sole member of this organisation:...
  2. Thread: Inquiry

    by bleuair
    Replies
    4
    Views
    270

    Well, I did not come across this post earlier but...

    Well, I did not come across this post earlier but submitted a change request yesterday. The label used in JP was a LC-41 (Lancair Certified 41st model), which refers to the -400 model.

    The...
  3. Replies
    3
    Views
    510

    Question here, I discovered that my own pics are...

    Question here, I discovered that my own pics are all now having 4 function
    (add watermark - despite many have it already / resubmit photo / correct info - not working since redesign of page / NEW...
  4. Replies
    6
    Views
    421

    Was rejected by Screener without comment. ...

    Was rejected by Screener without comment. ...
  5. Replies
    6
    Views
    421

    I will proceed as suggested, thanks Erwin. ...

    I will proceed as suggested, thanks Erwin.



    Sure Brian, see here data retrieved from the official sources. [EDIT: Pics all in db now, replaced image with photo link to JP]

    N900T ...
  6. Replies
    6
    Views
    421

    Homebuilt Lighter-than-air - how?

    Dear all,

    I would like to add some hot air balloons. They seem to be homebuilt - manufacturer is a person's name instead of a brand.

    How do I treat this?

    Add new manufacturers under...
  7. Replies
    28
    Views
    3,288

    Sticky: moved here...

    moved here
  8. Thread: Question

    by bleuair
    Replies
    6
    Views
    524

    still no traces of C-FHUW here, Guy?

    still no traces of C-FHUW here, Guy?
  9. Just reporting having had the same issue earlier...

    Just reporting having had the same issue earlier this month.

    Workaround indeed was, resubmit and make a note.

    IIRC it's also only been with military genre.
  10. Replies
    218
    Views
    24,825

    Sticky: Please @ErwinS change type of aircraft. ...

    Please @ErwinS change type of aircraft.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9336937

    Type should be: S.A. Engins Matra Moynet 360-6 Jupiter
  11. Thank you Laurence, If I use the "airport"...

    Thank you Laurence,
    If I use the "airport" upload form, it does not allow "other location". But if I use the "aircraft" form and use 'airport' in the type fields, it works as it ever did.
    Thanks...
  12. Replies
    600
    Views
    104,197

    Sticky: done

    done
  13. Uploading Airport Photos of NON-ICAO listed surfaces

    Dear Admins,
    Few weeks into the new upload forms, which now have a duplicated one for airports only.
    I'm trying to upload a non-ICAO coded airport surface but seems this isn't possible any...
  14. Replies
    3
    Views
    475

    Oh, a good catch "zomeu" on the -6 model. I...

    Oh, a good catch "zomeu" on the -6 model. I overlooked this aspect and just filed the request to add this subvariant.
  15. Thread: Question

    by bleuair
    Replies
    6
    Views
    524

    C23 is confirmed by Canadian public register, by...

    C23 is confirmed by Canadian public register, by type and by MTOW.
    C23 is named the Sundowner.
    If it was a Musketeer, it's called C19 or A23 (and had less MTOW)
    The Beechcraft Sundowner is...
  16. Replies
    218
    Views
    24,825

    Sticky: Given someone supported my request in the same...

    Given someone supported my request in the same manner... All submitted to db correction screener.
  17. Replies
    10
    Views
    547

    The above issue was sorted - sunny weather and...

    The above issue was sorted - sunny weather and new date - new pic for the db. https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9277697

    The museum leads to the next question. I uploaded a shot from the inside, of a...
  18. Replies
    18
    Views
    759

    Noo, not at all 8-) For me the body size and...

    Noo, not at all 8-)
    For me the body size and control layout was always the reason to stick with midrange Cams. Plus the capability vs size vs price -ratio is best imho.
    Well the 70-300VR is,...
  19. Replies
    5
    Views
    393

    done

    done
  20. Replies
    18
    Views
    759

    I know one... however I upgraded through the...

    I know one... however I upgraded through the Nikon Line up with the years. Most images up to 08-2008 were shot with a D50 (and mostly a Nikkor 70-300/4.5-5.6 VR) - even my most clicked & decorated...
  21. Replies
    5
    Views
    393

    Much appreciated Brenden, thank you for helping...

    Much appreciated Brenden, thank you for helping out!


    Thumbs up (y) !
  22. Replies
    108
    Views
    28,496

    Sticky: Please change ...

    Please change
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8130491
    Airline to read:
    Flugbetriebs AG Sarnen-Kägiswil
    (watch the umlaut please)
    same as id=8410314
    Thanks!
  23. Replies
    600
    Views
    104,197

    Sticky: done

    done
  24. Replies
    5
    Views
    393

    Royal Flying Doctors: operator error

    Dear all,

    There are several different operations of the RFDS. This aircraft is operated by a different operation than initially uploaded.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9257063
    Would you...
  25. Replies
    218
    Views
    24,825

    Sticky: May I kindly ask the data admins to look into the...

    May I kindly ask the data admins to look into the several open requests, the oldest unanswered of juancosmo in #183 now 4 weeks ago?

    Thank you... (all my other third party correction requests...
  26. Replies
    218
    Views
    24,825

    Sticky: I collect the open items, please change: the...

    I collect the open items, please change:

    the MSN on this photo was lost. Please add MSN 12324
    to this shot https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8762784

    please add the type of aircraft to these...
  27. Replies
    218
    Views
    24,825

    Sticky: moved to #187

    moved to #187
  28. Replies
    218
    Views
    24,825

    Sticky: moved to #187

    moved to #187
  29. Replies
    8
    Views
    586

    Thank you Brian, 100 points, of course it does....

    Thank you Brian, 100 points, of course it does. Only that we're not talking of the F-GWTF aka Immatriculation aka Registration but on the Identification aka 00-WB. ;-)

    And I forgot to...
  30. Replies
    8
    Views
    586

    Thanks Brian, we're getting there. While I...

    Thanks Brian, we're getting there.


    While I agree with what you came up with, it's also about terminology.
    There's no "registration" at all in France.

    F-GXYZ is called "immatriculation".
    ...
  31. Replies
    8
    Views
    586

    Thank you Brian for your response. I asked...

    Thank you Brian for your response.

    I asked for a strategy on french UL registrations.

    So what you claim being the reg is a code for the airport where the aircraft has its registered homebase....
  32. Replies
    8
    Views
    586

    French registration confusion

    Bonjour,

    I upped F-JSWM shot and got a rejection for similar which was a screeners misperception I think: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7183481 is similar to which image?

    And...
  33. Replies
    10
    Views
    547

    Thanks for your feedback Dana, to which I...

    Thanks for your feedback Dana,

    to which I partially agree. However in my appeal I expressed my opinion that the exposure as per the middle one above is best possible, all white tones in the sky...
  34. Replies
    10
    Views
    547

    I got the shot below rejected for invalid hot....

    I got the shot below rejected for invalid hot. Did NOT appeal but reuploaded.

    Now I get it rejected for contrast (too much and too few). My appeal was rejected [but the response referred to the...
  35. Replies
    28
    Views
    3,288

    Sticky: I submitted the request again on March 10th....

    I submitted the request again on March 10th. Still do not have an e-mail confirming whether my request was accepted or rejected (now two requests each).
    There is now one of two airports in (LSVD)...
  36. Replies
    218
    Views
    24,825

    Sticky: done

    done
  37. Replies
    3
    Views
    419

    Hopefully the correct one... ;) There's a...

    Hopefully the correct one... ;)
    There's a correction button below the image to the right when logged in. You could submit corrections (currently only to other than your own pics) and it would be...
  38. Replies
    28
    Views
    3,288

    Sticky: Sorry, my bad. Missed that one too and now tried...

    Sorry, my bad. Missed that one too and now tried again. Thanks in advance!
  39. Replies
    28
    Views
    3,288

    Sticky: I'm giving it a try again. Has an Umlaut in it,...

    I'm giving it a try again. Has an Umlaut in it, be prepared ;)

    Thanks, really eager to see a solution in the Umlaut saga for a while now :-) bunch of pics from EDRF waiting to go in but given...
  40. Replies
    28
    Views
    3,288

    Sticky: Dear Data Screener, some 10 days ago I requested...

    Dear Data Screener, some 10 days ago I requested multiple airports to be added and haven't heard anything since. Any chance to get an indication about when this would be ready to use? There was no...
Results 1 to 40 of 146
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4