If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hi all. I am here to seek help on my recently rejected photo. It was initially rejected for softness through normal screening but then rejected for backlit through an appeal attempt. I find this unfair as screeners should initially state the full reason of rejection through normal screening instead of just making it up right after. Photo attached below.
Additionally, I find this photo very sharp, as the plane was taken very close up, with the sharpness sliders adjusted to the max on LrC. I'm aware of slight toplit/backlit, but it still seemed acceptable. I have gotten other images with similar angle and lighting successfully accepted in the same batch of photos. Any help is appreciated, thanks in advance.
Recently I submitted five photos to the queue to be screened. At around place ~16k in the queue I got an email telling me all the photos have been rejected for quote "low quality", and "not meeting our criteria". For two photos this was understandable, the angle and lighting conditions weren't quite right. However, the other three seem of good quality and to me look like they do meet the criteria. I did not get any hint to what I did wrong in these images and would like feedback on them to know how I can adjust them in order for them to meet the criteria, or avoid such mistakes in the future. The mail they sent does not help me to improve my photos or give any concrete reason as to why they have been rejected by the screening team.
Below are three of the five images I submitted which I think should match the criteria. What have I done wrong?
The attached 5 photos were all rejected for under-sharpened soft. For all these photos I used Sharpening settings at 150, detail at 100, radius at 1.5, and masking between 75-85. Would appreciate advice on what to do in the future and whether these are worth appealing. Thanks...
Hello, I have developed some old slides and the result is these photos, I was wondering if they are ok to put on the website as I’d love to show older aviation.
I recently submitted a photo for review, but it was unfortunately rejected. I’m having a bit of trouble understanding the reason behind this decision and would appreciate any insights or advice you could provide.
The photo in question is of a UPS cargo airplane in flight, captured during nighttime or twilight hours. The aircraft is in sharp focus against a blurred background, suggesting motion. The landing gear is partially extended, indicating that the plane is either taking off or landing. The UPS logo and “Worldwide Services” text are clearly visible on the fuselage.
Despite selecting the ‘night shot’ option during submission, my photo was still rejected. Could anyone help me understand why this might be the case? I’m eager to learn and improve my photography skills, and your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance for your time and assistance.
I put this photo to my queue as a normal photo. The photo was rejected because it was undersharpened (soft). I did an appeal because I think this photo is not soft and it should be accepted to Jetphotos. Next day I got the appeal result and it was odd.
Here is the answer I got:
Your appeal for photo id 11915776 has been processed and has been rejected.
Admin Comments >> Invalid hot photos are rejected for invalid hot only for this exact reason. No skipping the queue for you.
My photo was rejected due undersharpened (soft)!
I wanted to know how my photo is too soft and this screener writes me about hot photos?! What the screener was thinking?
...
Can someone please have a look at this picture, I have tried uploading it countless times and it keeps getting rejected for different reasons, it seems to be one step forward and two steps backwards, where every time I solve one problem another arises, it also keeps saying too soft even though I've maxed the sharpness in lightroom, (My camera isn't the best but still), and it keeps saying information incorrect, I can't autofill because this would be the first picture of this plane. I'm near certain the info is right, so some guidance on what I'm getting wrong would also be nice.
How do you remove dots on windoes from your pictures?
Hello! Yesterday before my flight, I was taking pictures of some planes through the windows at the McNamara Terminal in Detroit. If you have ever been to that terminal, you know how hard it is to get pictures because of the tiny black dots on the windows. When I was editing pictures today, I found it quite challenging to try to remove them with Photoshop and Lightroom.
If anyone knows any way to remove them, please let me know. Thanks!
Recently, my queue of 5 images were all rejected, as apparently none of them met the standards. Since there were no specific reasons for these being rejected, and they were all immediately deleted, I'd like to ask some of the more experienced photographers / screeners for some advice on why these were rejected, and what I can do to improve them in terms of post-processing and shooting techniques / camera settings. I use a Nikon D3, which is a fairly old DSLR but takes great quality photos. I use Lightroom to edit these photos, and I am fairly new to photography.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: