My thoughts on the "turmoil" between this and Airl
That's the whole point. Airliners.net only accepts photos of commercial or near-commercial quality or those that are of historical or otherwise special interest. That's very fine but when I look for a particular registration I just want to see the plane, I don't care if the pic is not of publishable quality. In this respect there certainly is room on the net for a site that will publish a large quantity of pics of different airliners regardless of artistic/aesthetic value rather than, for example, accept 20 great pics of the same aircraft while rejecting 19 not-so-great shots of 19 different ones.
quote:
Originally posted by Ian Duke:
Chris, you've accepted my photos though, so that makes you WAY better than Airliners [img]images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]
That's the whole point. Airliners.net only accepts photos of commercial or near-commercial quality or those that are of historical or otherwise special interest. That's very fine but when I look for a particular registration I just want to see the plane, I don't care if the pic is not of publishable quality. In this respect there certainly is room on the net for a site that will publish a large quantity of pics of different airliners regardless of artistic/aesthetic value rather than, for example, accept 20 great pics of the same aircraft while rejecting 19 not-so-great shots of 19 different ones.
Comment