Originally posted by UA777222
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What camera/lens should i buy?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by pvsoestAh, well... now, this digital M they've speculating about for ages... :rolleyes:
Paul
Originally posted by UA777222Hello all,
-Canon EOS Digital Rebel (300D) + Canon Battery Grip
-Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM
-Canon EF 75-300mm f4-5.6 III USM
-Canon EF 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 USM
And when I first got my lens I picked up a Sigma 170-500 which I am now selling with the addition of my 400L IS.
I would have to disagree with the idea that investing in a pro camera is the way to go. It will require expeareance as we all know but mostly it kind of leaves you out to dry. In my opinion, unless you have loads of money just laying around, that as long as you invest in a reasonable camera you are still left with cash to get camera lenses.
Matt
One shouldn't indeed start with a pro camera if that prevents getting good glass. But once you've used one there's no way back.
I should know, I've purchased an F100 a few years ago after 20 years of low/mid range SLRs and now everything less (including cameras like the D100 which is no bad camera at all) seem inadequate in comparison.
But when I got that F100 I already had a decent set of glass (and got some more together with the camera) so I wasn't starting from scratch.
Looking at the lowend cameras I now consider them very slow (which can be partially overcome by using AF-S/USM lenses, but those don't cure things like shutterlag and in digital cameras bufferlag), but what's worse the small viewfinders seem incredibly claustrophobic.
That said, I might buy a D50 when that's put on the market (supposedly next month) as a plaything and for non-critical things where it's more important to get the results out quickly than it is to get shots that have lasting value and are of top notch quality.
Comment
-
I must say I went from the F5 to the D100 and I don´t miss the F5 much. Most of the stuff were it clearly beats the D100 is not so important for the non professional user.
I would rather go midlevel DSLR body (as they are still getting old quickly) and put the money saved in some professional glass. My Nikon AF-S 300 2.8D was really expensive, but is still worth every cent.
Comment
-
I must say that I have seen good results with the 75-300 non USM on a rebel XT......70-200 f4L is not great if you can't get good close access.
I'm going to the 300 F4L and the 1.4X TC for where I shoot.....
Just a little extra for those Canadian photographers out there:
www.cameracanada.com (located in London, Ontario: it's the Canadian version of B&H)
www.vistek.ca (located in Toronto, good prices)
Comment
-
i also found what seems to be a good website, www.sigma4less.com... prices are astonishing.^----raveing lunatic
please excuse my horendus mangeling of the english language, its only my first :P
Comment
-
What camera /lens should i buy
For Nikons if you can get your hands on one, consider the 28/70 F2.8 ed. If your serious about the quality of your work, It' s a bit pricey, but you get what you pay for, very fast & needle sharp. They do not get any better, rated AAA+.
Contrails
Comment
-
Originally posted by UA777222I currently shoot with the following;
-Canon EOS Digital Rebel (300D) + Canon Battery Grip
-Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM
-Canon EF 75-300mm f4-5.6 III USM
-Canon EF 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 USM
Comment
-
Would this camera be any good for taking pictures of planes?
It's only 3 megapixels. Is that too low for "jetphotos.net quality" pictures?
What about a 4.0 megapixel camera? Is that too low?
Comment
-
MPs are not everything. The first thing you need to work out, which zoom range do you need for your mostly visited airport. Then you need to check the focus speed of the camera and your personal price limited. After checking noise performance and the white balance performance, you can think about MPs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JordanDWould this camera be any good for taking pictures of planes?
It's only 3 megapixels. Is that too low for "jetphotos.net quality" pictures?
What about a 4.0 megapixel camera? Is that too low?
Paul
Comment
-
The next big thing is to get my parents to buy me one. That's gonna take some hard work! I worked out that at the rate I take pictures, by the end of the year I will have spent 350 dollars on processing, mostly of which are photos that didn't come out good.
Comment
-
Okay I'm gonna be joining the 21st centruy and finally go digital, although not giving up my film. My family is comming into money soon and my parents are going to get me a DSLR. Here's the tough part, choosing. I've narrowed it down between the Canon 20D or Minolta Maxxum 7D. I already own a maxxum 4 with 28-80 and 70-300mm lenses and at first thats what had me leaning towards the 7D but that sucker is heavy and I can't imagine how heavy it would be with a 70-300mm lens on it. Another one I was looking at was the Nikon d70 but for some reason it just didn't feel comfortable holding it (can't quite put my finger on why). Opinions on these 2 cameras or similar ones would be awesome
BTW: It would not necessarily be used just for aviation photography, but landscapes, purty flowers etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fly1346would you guys recommend a D60... most likely used from ebay, but I see good deals with good lenses from 600-700Click Here for my aviation photographs.
No Frontiers
Comment
Comment