Page 342 of 505 FirstFirst ... 242292332340341342343344352392442 ... LastLast
Results 6,821 to 6,840 of 10098

Thread: Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.

  1. #6821
    Senior Member Jan-Jasinski's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    CYOW
    Posts
    1,104

    Default

    A little bump with a couple extra, with one fixed (LH 733 wing view). Thanks

  2. #6822
    Senior Member PMN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bradford, UK
    Posts
    2,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C-FITL View Post
    A little bump with a couple extra, with one fixed (LH 733 wing view). Thanks
    The contrail shot has too much noise and needs to be closer so we can see the actual plane rather than a dot!

    The wing view should be fine.

    The 3rd and 4th don't really fit into either a ramp or aircraft category and both are quite soft. These two are no-go's I'm afraid.
    Seeing the world with a 3:2 aspect ratio...

    My images on Flickr

  3. #6823
    High Sierra Spotter RCoulter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Reno,NV
    Posts
    729

    Default

    Is the centering and sharpening OK on this?
    http://highsierraspotters.com/forum/...6102010rno.jpg

  4. #6824
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,778

    Default

    It needs a tad higher in the frame, sharpening is oke.

  5. #6825
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    374

    Default I don't recive an answer, I'll try again

    [quote=Omar Alex Saffe;562678]WJ,
    These pics aren't good for our database I'm afraid. They are either backlit or overexposed and they all lack contrast. Good for the personal collection.


    Siegi,
    Please.... again this Continental 777 is really jagged (oversharpened) - I'm sure you can see it yourself
    Best regards to all
    Alex

    I don't recive an answer, I'll try again:

    I see it's not successful me, impossible it's too much, because every image I make the radius 1.0 Sharpen 67-68 and Hope! JP accept me photos.
    How can see jagged?

    I will try radius 0.8 and sharpen 63%, better?

    More opinion for photos:
    1. 767-300 of Quantas

    2. A330-200 Air Berlin:

    3. Spotting:

    4. On the park:

    I did not notice that I have two similar photos in queue then which picture is better?
    1. http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3180770
    2. http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3182686
    Photo is less good I delete.
    best regards,
    Siegi.

  6. #6826
    High Sierra Spotter RCoulter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Reno,NV
    Posts
    729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pdeboer View Post
    It needs a tad higher in the frame, sharpening is oke.
    Thanks Pamela.

  7. #6827
    Senior Member Jan-Jasinski's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    CYOW
    Posts
    1,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PMN View Post
    The contrail shot has too much noise and needs to be closer so we can see the actual plane rather than a dot!

    The wing view should be fine.

    The 3rd and 4th don't really fit into either a ramp or aircraft category and both are quite soft. These two are no-go's I'm afraid.
    Thank you sir!
    And just a opinion here: (btw, previous post, I had 3 flickr links, here they are again
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/janjasi...7624847307095/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/janjasi...7624996341789/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/janjasi...7624996341789/

    If you don't mind here are 4 more attachments, it does exceed more than 5, but the Flickr links are from last week or so.

  8. #6828
    Senior Member PMN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bradford, UK
    Posts
    2,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C-FITL View Post
    Thank you sir!
    And just a opinion here: (btw, previous post, I had 3 flickr links, here they are again
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/janjasi...7624847307095/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/janjasi...7624996341789/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/janjasi...7624996341789/

    If you don't mind here are 4 more attachments, it does exceed more than 5, but the Flickr links are from last week or so.
    As they are I don't think any of them are acceptable, but rather than go through them one by one there's something I want you to do.

    http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=44854

    This is a link to the upload guidelines which are required reading for all JP contributors. It's very extensive and there are many examples of what is and isn't acceptable. Spending a good amount of time familiarising yourself with them will help you understand what standards are required for images to be accepted, and of course, you can always ask here in the forums if you need anything clarifying. Please do spend time reading up on them though, and I mean proper time! They're excellent guidelines and really will help you.
    Seeing the world with a 3:2 aspect ratio...

    My images on Flickr

  9. #6829
    Member Bjorn1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Is this one okay for the jetphotos database ?



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    Best regards,

    Bjorn

  10. #6830
    Senior Member PMN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bradford, UK
    Posts
    2,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjorn1979 View Post
    Is this one okay for the jetphotos database ?
    Sure looks good to me!
    Seeing the world with a 3:2 aspect ratio...

    My images on Flickr

  11. #6831
    Member Bjorn1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PMN View Post
    Sure looks good to me!
    Okay thanks Paul

  12. #6832
    Senior Member Jan-Jasinski's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    CYOW
    Posts
    1,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PMN View Post
    As they are I don't think any of them are acceptable, but rather than go through them one by one there's something I want you to do.

    http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?t=44854

    This is a link to the upload guidelines which are required reading for all JP contributors. It's very extensive and there are many examples of what is and isn't acceptable. Spending a good amount of time familiarising yourself with them will help you understand what standards are required for images to be accepted, and of course, you can always ask here in the forums if you need anything clarifying. Please do spend time reading up on them though, and I mean proper time! They're excellent guidelines and really will help you.
    Thanks, I will read them, but does this mean the attachments are not good at all?

  13. #6833
    High Sierra Spotter RCoulter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Reno,NV
    Posts
    729

    Default

    Would this be too grainy (ISO3200) to have a chance or should I give it a go?
    http://highsierraspotters.com/forum/...rno_687757.jpg

  14. #6834
    Senior Member pilotgolfer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Grand Forks, ND
    Posts
    1,807

    Default

    ^ Awesome shot, Ryan.


    Is this shot up to par?
    http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a3...s/n74td_wm.jpg

    Thanks.

  15. #6835
    High Sierra Spotter RCoulter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Reno,NV
    Posts
    729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pilotgolfer View Post
    ^ Awesome shot, Ryan.
    Thanks ... Ryan!

  16. #6836
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,411

    Default

    Ryan,
    Sorry but Ryan's shot is not that awsome Ryan...
    ok ok sorry about the Ryan Ryan joke...
    But seriously this shot looks too soft to me and there' not much contrast. So it's borderline at least.

    Best regards
    Alex

  17. #6837
    Member Derice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Near EHAM (Schiphol Amsterdam Airport), The Netherlands
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Anyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by Derice View Post
    Yesterday I went to EHAM to make some sunrise shots (first time for me).
    I was wondering what you think of this image?

    Have more ofcourse, but as I haven't edited dawn shots before, I'm not sure how to read the histogram, etc. The histogram clearly says under exposed (but I assume that's 'natural' in dawn shots). Can anyone advise me?

    http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4088/...fa98a2e3_b.jpg
    http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4112/...73bf3ee1_b.jpg

  18. #6838
    High Sierra Spotter RCoulter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Reno,NV
    Posts
    729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omar Alex Saffe View Post
    Ryan,
    Sorry but Ryan's shot is not that awsome Ryan...
    ok ok sorry about the Ryan Ryan joke...
    But seriously this shot looks too soft to me and there' not much contrast. So it's borderline at least.

    Best regards
    Alex
    Thanks Alex if you are talking about mine! I may give it a re-work.

  19. #6839
    High Sierra Spotter RCoulter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Reno,NV
    Posts
    729

  20. #6840
    roadrunner
    Guest

    Default Please comment

    Here are some more in addition to the previous posts I've submitted.

    Aircraft regos are

    1 - 19-7437
    2 - 24-4311
    3 - 24-4421
    4 - 24-4475
    5 - 24-5361
    Last edited by roadrunner; 10-27-2010 at 10:43 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •