Page 1 of 505 1231151101501 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 10098

Thread: Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.

  1. #1
    Senior Member BA747-436's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Now there's a question.
    Posts
    5,741

    Exclamation Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.

    It seems allot of you would like a second opinion, or even a third from screeners regarding photos your are not entirely sure about uploading either for quality or motive reasons. Therefore we have devised this thread purely to give you advice on any editing or changes that the screeners feel could benefit the photo or advice from us to you with regards to weather the photo stands a good chance of being accepted.

    Please remember this is only our opinion and does not guarantee that your photo will be accepted. The aim of this thread is purely to give you advice and helpful comments from our experienced team of screeners.

    This thread will be monitored by screeners throughout the day. So you shouldn't have to wait to long for a reply!

    Please note: This thread is only open for screeners to reply to. This has been decided with the aim in mind to keep it as clean, easy to use and clutter free as possible.

  2. #2
    www.iesphotography.co.uk Manc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Now...London but born and bred Manc!
    Posts
    313

    Default

    ok a starter for 10!
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=866180 to soft in parts?
    2x Canon 1Dmk3 -- Canon 400mm F2.8 IS L - Canon 100-400mm L IS USM -- Canon EF 70-200mm L IS F2.8 --Canon 300mm F2.8 IS L










  3. #3
    Senior Member BA747-436's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Now there's a question.
    Posts
    5,741

    Default

    The idea is to ask before you put them in the queue

    Id say yes overall alittle soft, especialy around the starboard side of the aircraft.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Star Alliance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville,Florida
    Posts
    1,644

    Default

    What about this one?
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=866872
    If it isn't good enough, I can remove it from the Queue.

    EDIT: It got accepted after all: [photoid=5692803]

  5. #5
    Senior Member BA747-436's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Now there's a question.
    Posts
    5,741

    Default

    Look alright, alittle grainy but should be ok

  6. #6
    Senior Member Star Alliance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Jacksonville,Florida
    Posts
    1,644

    Default

    Thanks a tonne Dan!

  7. #7
    Senior Member BA747-436's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Now there's a question.
    Posts
    5,741

    Default

    Not a problem, glad i can be of help

  8. #8
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by US Airways
    What about this one?
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=866872
    If it isn't good enough, I can remove it from the Queue,
    Looks a tad unlevel to me. Don't know, how the screener will judge it.

    Gerardo

  9. #9
    Senior Member G-DALE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    2,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343
    Looks a tad unlevel to me. Don't know, how the screener will judge it.

    Gerardo
    Yeah I'd agree Gerardo. Nothing too major but if you want to correct it I'd say tilting it 0.3, if not 0.5 clockwise should do the trick

    Dale

  10. #10
    Senior Member egll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Portsmouth, Republic of Portsea.
    Posts
    2,172

    Default

    Yep, it is unlevel, the lighting is a little awkward but should be okay for acceptance-just need to rotate clockwise like Dale said.



    Matt

  11. #11
    JPElite Member!
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Chester, England.
    Posts
    1,367

    Default

    Too much noise?
    Grey plane, grey sky?
    Recycle bin?




    Thanks

  12. #12
    Senior Member BA747-436's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Now there's a question.
    Posts
    5,741

    Default

    Looks a bit dark a noisy to me Ashley. Not easy to get a good shot out of those conditions and those colours though!

  13. #13
    JPElite Member!
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Chester, England.
    Posts
    1,367

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BA747-436
    Looks a bit dark a noisy to me Ashley. Not easy to get a good shot out of those conditions and those colours though!
    Thought so, no doubt there will be another chance in better conditions sometime in the future but Prestwick is a bit off the beaten track for me.

    Thanks

  14. #14
    Senior Member BA747-436's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Now there's a question.
    Posts
    5,741

    Default

    If your travelling from Chester, yeah id say!

  15. #15
    Member Electric-Jet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    459

    Default

    How about this one?


  16. #16
    Member twr75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    YMML
    Posts
    766

    Default

    Boeing744,

    Looks to be a little soft. However there appears to be some sort of jpeg artifacts around the edges, and any sort of sharpening will only make these worse. Give the sharpening a go and we'll have another look.

  17. #17
    Member Electric-Jet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    459

    Default

    I gave it two more passes of USM. And it just gets worse.

  18. #18
    Member tsentsan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Sunny Isle
    Posts
    827

    Default

    One other point, IMHO it would receive the badangle rejection. Cant say the Belly shot is much fancied.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    9,812

    Default

    This one is edited, although I can see some undersharpen spots at some regions at the aircrafts, what do you think, screeners, Can I put this one in the queue??

    Inactive from May 1 2009.

  20. #20
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,486

    Default

    I wouldn't upload it. The angle is questionable IMO. But above all, it seems soft, underexposed and lacking contrast.

    Perhaps you can tweak it in Photoshop, but then there's still the angle, which I personally don't really like.

    Cheers
    Gerardo

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •