Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 242

Thread: Hot photo use reminder!!

  1. #61
    Administrator seahawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Germany - near DUS
    Posts
    7,823

    Default

    Depends. Another P-51, rather not. A BF-110, P-47, P-40 or Wildcat or FW190. If there are no previous pics of the bird in the db, then it is worth a try.

  2. #62
    Member Alberto U.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Buenos Aires
    Posts
    249

    Default

    Hi,

    I recently had a "hot" rejection (among other reasons) of a bizjet. The upload was under the "hot" category not because of a new reg for JP, but because it was a very recently built aircraft. It was built in Dec. 2007 and deliviered to its current (unkown) owner and registered by the end of June, less than 2 months ago. I thought that would qualify as hot being a new aircraft (but not a new model)? If not, what am I not getting (yes, I AM stupid! )

    Thanx and I appologize to the screeners for me using the hot feature in the wrong way, I know it takes time off your work .. sorry!

    regards

  3. #63
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    8

    Default

    G'day All,

    Just so I hopefully don't waste the screeners time in the fututre;

    What about something like a new deployment of visiting millitary jets to your local airport?

    For example, we had some Singaporean F-16s visit Williamtown last year. Would it be ok to submit the first images I get of something like that as hot photos (if it happens in the future, not for last years F-16 photos)?

    Cheers and thanks for the help.
    Motty.

  4. #64
    Member Vishal Jolapara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Mumbai, India.
    Posts
    480

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Motty
    What about something like a new deployment of visiting millitary jets to your local airport?

    For example, we had some Singaporean F-16s visit Williamtown last year. Would it be ok to submit the first images I get of something like that as hot photos
    I can totally understand the excitement such an event/sight generates however it wouldnt constitute a hot photo.

    Cheers - Vishal

  5. #65
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vishal Jolapara
    I can totally understand the excitement such an event/sight generates however it wouldnt constitute a hot photo.

    Cheers - Vishal
    No worries.

    Thanks for the help Vishal.

    Cheers,
    Motty.

  6. #66
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Hi everyone... it says that a photo is hot when is't about a new type of aircraft for an airliner.

    So, If an airliner have a couple of A319-112 but it receives a third one type A319-115 and this one has some differences about the -112 type it would be a Hot photo?

    I'm confused about this because someone says that an aircraft with brand new winglets it would be hot, so I think that in this case, the new A319 it'd be a hot photo... wouldn't be?

    thanks a lot.

    Gatto
    _______________________________

    Will I ever repeat this?

  7. #67
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,518

    Default

    Nope, an A319-115 after a -112 is not a hot photo. First aircraft with winglets in a fleet, for example the first B738 with winglets, has been accepted as hot in the past.

  8. #68
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    Nope, an A319-115 after a -112 is not a hot photo. First aircraft with winglets in a fleet, for example the first B738 with winglets, has been accepted as hot in the past.
    thanks, very clear.

    cheers
    _______________________________

    Will I ever repeat this?

  9. #69
    Member mnazarinia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    YMML
    Posts
    240

    Default Inaugural MEL-LAX run

    Dear Screeners,

    Will the Inaugural MEL-LAX run (first revenue flight) of Qantas A380 (VH-OQA) be counted as hot?

    Regards,
    Mehdi.

  10. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Somewhere in Eastern Sydney
    Posts
    177

    Default

    OOPS! I am so sorry, Tom I may have spammed your inbox with a letter before I actually checked my que results. I am so, so, so, sorry. If there was a decent blush emoticon... Put it this way, I owe you beer.
    Last edited by Powercube; 11-04-2008 at 08:49 PM.

  11. #71
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    298

    Default

    So I uploaded this as a hot photo Back in January: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6465473

    I asked if it could be added to the ticker page. It wasn't.

    A month later, this appears on the ticker page: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6477553

    Why?






  12. #72
    Senior Member brianw999's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
    Posts
    11,874

    Default

    Mark,

    I can only assume that the sole screener ( it was Instant Added ) continued with their screening and forgot about the ticker addition when they finished their screening session.
    To make a ticker entry we have to leave the screening page, find the new accepted picture ID number ( it's different to the queue ID number ) and create the ticker. I would imagine that after a possible long run of screening it was omitted.

    I am confident that the crew will allow me to offer an apology on their behalf, we are but human !
    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !


  13. #73
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    298

    Default

    Hi Brian,

    Thanks for posting a reponse.


    I noticed a ticker entry about Sun Country's first 737-700. I guess no one remembers Sun Country received two 73G's in 2001:

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Sun-Country-Airlines/Boeing-737-7Q8/0213306/L/

    Granted they are a rare shot as none entered revenue service, but these were technically the first. Just being a nit-pick.






  14. #74
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    YHZ, Nova Scotia
    Posts
    47

    Default

    The hijacked CANJET flight 918 in Montego Bay returned to home base today....Halifax. Before I upload it, hot photo or not? I think probably not, but I am not 100% certain so I throw the question out to everyone.

  15. #75
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,518

    Default

    nope, not hot photo ... unless you show the actual hijacking

  16. #76
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    17

    Default

    A P-51 came to an airfield near my city this afternoon and I got some good shots. It is the first time a Mustang comes to Toulouse and it comes from Norway. As local newspapers will look for photos of it during the next few days, and that I have a chance to get published, can I upload it as a "hot photo" ?

  17. #77
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Oeteldonk, the Netherlands
    Posts
    1,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisYoung View Post
    A P-51 came to an airfield near my city this afternoon and I got some good shots. It is the first time a Mustang comes to Toulouse and it comes from Norway. As local newspapers will look for photos of it during the next few days, and that I have a chance to get published, can I upload it as a "hot photo" ?
    It's a well documented type, so unless it has a livery not previously seen it won't qualify. You could just send (low-res) copies to the newspapers and offer them to send the high-res photo at a modest fee.
    Please visit my website! http://www.schipholspotter.com/

    Don't make me use uppercase...

  18. #78
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Ok, thanks.

    For the livery, well... it's "Old Crow", not too bad known.

  19. #79
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Oeteldonk, the Netherlands
    Posts
    1,099

    Default

    Today a new airline was rolled out of the Eindhoven paintshop. Should I wait uploading till it has been added to the drop-down menu (already requested, can take 24-48 hrs), or can I upload immediately with the name of the previous operator?
    Please visit my website! http://www.schipholspotter.com/

    Don't make me use uppercase...

  20. #80
    Dutch ....... ErwinS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    EHAM/SPL
    Posts
    4,094

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Petertenthije View Post
    Today a new airline was rolled out of the Eindhoven paintshop. Should I wait uploading till it has been added to the drop-down menu (already requested, can take 24-48 hrs), or can I upload immediately with the name of the previous operator?
    Peter you must mean the NordStar 737 Upload it an we will add the airline, leave a remark for the screeners that it's a new airine.

    Rgds,
    “The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”

    Erwin


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •