Page 6 of 13 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 242

Thread: Hot photo use reminder!!

  1. #101
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    13

    Default

    I have the photo ID 2744397 rejected today because of invalid hot photos. But after that I see in database photo ID 6698236 accepted. All of two photos taken in one day so why is not my photo hot?

  2. #102
    JPElite Member!
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Chester, England.
    Posts
    1,367

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pianisthuy View Post
    I have the photo ID 2744397 rejected today because of invalid hot photos. But after that I see in database photo ID 6698236 accepted. All of two photos taken in one day so why is not my photo hot?
    The first photo was accepted as hot beacuase of the paint sheme and not because of the reason given by the photographer, (ie that this was the first photo of this particular airframe). If you gave your " hot reason" as being that this was a new aircraft then that reason is invalid and so the screener concerned was within the rules to reject your shot.

  3. #103
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    52

    Default

    It's acceptable as hot a photo featuring an emergency landing or an accident?

  4. #104
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,476

    Default

    A photo showing an emergency landing usually simply shows an aircraft landing. If the incident is visible, then it can be uploaded as hot. Possible examples: Iberia MD-83 landing with the front gear not open at GVA some years back or Bluejet A320 landing with the blocked front gear.

    An accident is more serious than a simple incident. The actual accident can be uploaded as hot. But there is a "ethic" limit. For example a small prop just about to crash, where we know the pilot did not survive will be rejected.

  5. #105
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Ok, thank you!

  6. #106
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    118

    Default

    What about actual events. For instance now with the ash clouds ramps being completely empty or contrary full clutered with aircraft, completelly
    desolated terminals e.g.
    Being the actuallity now i.m.o. the pics will say more at this moment than after passing a queue of 10000 in a week or more.



  7. #107
    Dutch ....... ErwinS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    EHAM/SPL
    Posts
    4,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AdLob View Post
    What about actual events. For instance now with the ash clouds ramps being completely empty or contrary full clutered with aircraft, completelly
    desolated terminals e.g.
    Being the actuallity now i.m.o. the pics will say more at this moment than after passing a queue of 10000 in a week or more.
    Nope, the ash cloud is now old news allready. And if we would accept them as hot I think we would be flooded with pictures of empty ramps or static aircraft uploaded as hot.
    They would say still enough after they went through the normal screening process.

    rgds,
    “The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”

    Erwin


  8. #108
    Senior Member Jan-Jasinski's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    CYOW
    Posts
    1,104

    Default

    I shot this aircraft like 3 weeks ago. No shots of it in the databse. I want to put it was hot. ANET has 2 shots of it and JP none. I am still awaiting confirmation from JP after almost 2 weeks when they said it would be max 48hours. It is because this aircraft doesn't exist in the databse. Could someone please contact JP so they accept? Thanks.
    Canadair CL-600-2B16 Challenger 605

  9. #109
    Dutch ....... ErwinS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    EHAM/SPL
    Posts
    4,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C-FITL View Post
    I shot this aircraft like 3 weeks ago. No shots of it in the databse. I want to put it was hot. ANET has 2 shots of it and JP none. I am still when they said it would be max 48hours. It is because this aircraft doesn't exist in the databse. Could someone please contact JP so they accept? Thanks.
    Canadair CL-600-2B16 Challenger 605
    Jan,

    This shot doesn't qualify a hot. It's is just a Challenger right and only the engine of one.

    And I don't know what you mean with the 'awaiting confirmation from JP after almost 2 weeks'

    Rgds,
    “The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”

    Erwin


  10. #110
    Senior Member Jan-Jasinski's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    CYOW
    Posts
    1,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ErwinS View Post
    Jan,

    This shot doesn't qualify a hot. It's is just a Challenger right and only the engine of one.

    And I don't know what you mean with the 'awaiting confirmation from JP after almost 2 weeks'

    Rgds,
    But this Challenger model doesn't exist in the database. I am awaiting confirmation because I applied the aircraft type and they said wait for us to confirm (so it doesn't yet exist in databse).

  11. #111
    Dutch ....... ErwinS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    EHAM/SPL
    Posts
    4,072

    Default

    Challenger 605 is in our dbase.
    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos....Challenger 605

    Rgds,
    Last edited by ErwinS; 04-17-2010 at 03:12 PM.
    “The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”

    Erwin


  12. #112
    Member bleuair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    LSAS
    Posts
    297

    Default

    Hi everyone,

    just wanted to mention another criteria (completing the list spread over this topic ) which apparently does NOT qualify for a HOT photo, which is the production number of an aircraft type, e.g. the 500th aircraft of a certain type or the 1000th or the 5000th.

    Reason might be the similarity to the 499 (or whatever) previous built aircraft even if the "jubilee" always is a special achievement for the manufacturer.
    .

  13. #113
    Dutch ....... ErwinS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    EHAM/SPL
    Posts
    4,072

    Default

    If the aircraft has an special scheme to show that she is the 500th 1000th etc a/c then she is hot.
    “The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”

    Erwin


  14. #114
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    118

    Default

    What about a quiet brand new aircraft, only two in the DB but none yet with a sticker applied( in this case TC-TJG with 100%NL sticker).



  15. #115
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    185

    Default Hot - not

    Hi,

    I tried to get a shot accepted over a couple of hours on 12/7.I uploaded
    several 'hot' shots (of the same aircraft)that were all rejected with the last one rejected because it wasnt a 'hot' after I had sharpened it as requested.
    I appeal this as it wasnt the reason for its first rejection and get that yes indeed it was a 'hot' - but that the shot was 'oversharpened and grainy'
    Meanwhile another photographer has successfully uploaded a shot of the same aircraft - with sticker.
    I am left wondering if their is such a thing operating within jetphotos as a
    'clique' which would seem very unfair on the rest of us mortals?

    Mob

  16. #116
    JPElite Member!
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Chester, England.
    Posts
    1,367

    Default

    Mike,

    You were not the only person to get a rejection for quality issues on Hot uploads for images of that aircraft on that particular day. The conditions were clearly not ideal.

    There are no cliques just different screeners who all have slightly different opinions on where to draw the line on what is too soft or too sharp etc.
    I cant say why a screener decided that your image was invalid as a Hot photo.. that was an incorrect judgement by who ever made it but I am certain it was not because he/she was trying to keep your picture out of the database for personal reasons.
    Last edited by cja; 07-14-2010 at 02:45 PM.

  17. #117
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    104

    Default

    And what happens if one photo is accepted as "hot" and later you realized is not hot?
    _______________________________

    Will I ever repeat this?

  18. #118
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,476

    Default

    That's our mistake, not the photogrpahers one. The photo remains in the db. As the say goes: "Shit happens!"

    However, if we find out, he mislead us by making up a story, it will be deleted.

  19. #119
    Member Alberto U.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Buenos Aires
    Posts
    249

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    That's our mistake, not the photogrpahers one. The photo remains in the db. As the say goes: "Shit happens!"

    However, if we find out, he mislead us by making up a story, it will be deleted.
    There's a nice photo uploaded today as hot that says in the comment that it's a new scheme when in fact it's not, and the scheme has been around for years. I find it hard to believe that the photog didn't know this, nor the screener, since it's a very big and well known airline.

    I have nothing personal against anyone, but these things are sometimes very annoying.

    rgds

  20. #120
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    That's our mistake, not the photogrpahers one. The photo remains in the db. As the say goes: "Shit happens!"

    However, if we find out, he mislead us by making up a story, it will be deleted.
    Ok, but me as a photographer I can't upload a photo saying is hot because the aircraft has a new scheme when I had to check previously the current colors of the airline to say something like that...

    you have two options.. you did not check or.. I don't know what to think

    By the way, this is the photo and i also left a comment this morning but it was not accepted I think.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6960782

    cheers!
    _______________________________

    Will I ever repeat this?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •