Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

727 Air Intake Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 727 Air Intake Question

    At MCI on Tuesday I was frantically driving around near the cargo apron trying to find the rental car return (a difficult task with the terrible signage and detours all over the place) when I saw a B727 with an oddly flared number 2 engine air intake. It bulged just behind the opening not unlike the intake on the MD11. I have never noticed this on a B727 before and was wondering if anyone knew what that was all about.
    Sorry - unfortunately I don't remember who the plane was operating for even though it did have a name on it - but I'm guessing it must have been cargo or charter. It's livery was predominantly white. Thanks in advance!

  • #2
    That would be the hushkitted model. They have new engines that would not normally fit in the normal engine shaft. As such it has been enlarged. I believe it also requires more air to go through it, hence the larger opening.


    N922UP. Boeing 727-31C(QF). JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
    Please visit my website! http://www.schipholspotter.com/

    Don't make me use uppercase...

    Comment


    • #3
      The same here.

      The TAME 727's have STAGE 3 Hush kits. In spite the fact they are HUSHKITS they sound very strong. They wake me up at night!
      Lufthansa is the BEST!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re:

        All 721s have that characteristic bulge behind the air intake. The air intake w/r to the 721's #2 engine was designed as an oval, and then the engine casing behind that is circular, which looks like a bulge.

        All UPS 727s have a larger air intake itself and the first half of the engine casing is enlarged b/c UPS's 72s have Rolls-Royce Tays, which have a larger diameter.
        "Ok, I'm gonna get as many as I can on that SW pad there, uh... ok, Amarillo, you're #1, Houston-#2, Albuquerque #3, Phoenix-#4, Chicago-#5, Seattle-#6...

        Congratulations, Seattle!"

        Comment


        • #5

          The official diagrams from Boeing show that the statement, "...all 727-100s have the bulge" is not true.
          I think the bulge comes with the RR engine replacement for Stage III requirements. Thanks!

          Comment


          • #6
            Okay... I did a little more poking around and have learned that the plane I saw was a 727-100QF (also referred to as a 727-100RE). These 721s have had all three JTD engines replaced with RR Tays. This solution is one of several available approaches to meeting Stage 3 noise requirements (and can meet Stage 4 requirements with minor modifications) and is apparently only offered for the 727-100 series aircraft. It was probably a UPS aircraft I saw at MCI as they have modified a good number of their 727-100s in this way and I don't know if any other operators have. Here is a close up of the 'hump' I was referring to:

            photo:http://sobering.terracom.net/eaa99/UPS-727/
            Thanks for the replies.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re:

              Okay, I may have misunderstood your question, but yeah, that's basically the jist of it.

              UPS has re-engined all 72s in its fleet with the RRTays. I think they're the same type as the ones on the F-100. It's the only operator which has done so. There's a UPS 722 out at Will Rogers Airport in Oklahoma City which has the RRs as well.

              Btw, interesting fact: Boeing was originally considering the RRTay as the engine for the 72, but then switched to the JT8D instead. I garontee, we would be seeing more 72s flying around today had that been the case, and just possibly, a different version of the 72 as well.

              Happy Flying!
              "Ok, I'm gonna get as many as I can on that SW pad there, uh... ok, Amarillo, you're #1, Houston-#2, Albuquerque #3, Phoenix-#4, Chicago-#5, Seattle-#6...

              Congratulations, Seattle!"

              Comment

              Working...
              X