Is it true that you would get a smoother ride with planes with fly by wire technology? I read that, but I don't know if fly by wire has anything to do with mitigating the effects of turbulence. I would think that degree of wing flex, or other factors, would be more important.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does fly by wire make for a smoother ride?..
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by UALdave View PostIs it true that you would get a smoother ride with planes with fly by wire technology? I read that, but I don't know if fly by wire has anything to do with mitigating the effects of turbulence. I would think that degree of wing flex, or other factors, would be more important.
In the Airbus version of FBW, when operating in normal law (99.99% of the time I'd say) the airplane tries to keep 1 G (corrected for pitch and bank angles) unless the pilot (human or auto) pulls up or pushes down.
For example, with the airplane hand-flying straight and level and the stick centered, the FBW will try to keep 1G and if a gust starts to accelerate the plane up (tending to put the plane at more than 1G) the FBW will command elevators down to pitch down (even without pilot input) and compensate, trying to keep 1G.
But the FBW reaction is quick but not instantaneous.
If the increase in the gust is relatively smooth, and then the decrease is smooth enough, the FBW should do a pretty good work.
If the gust comes almost instantaneously, the FBW won't prevent an increase in the Gs, and if the gust disappears instantaneously too it will find the FBW pushing down and the result will be less than 1G.
Oh, and add a "theoretically" to all of the above.
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
-
Originally posted by UALdave View PostI would think that degree of wing flex, or other factors, would be more important.
I'm also thinking of the C-5 and that system that dampens the harmonic wing oscillations (I guess by aileron inputs).....pretty cool stuff, but it doesn't elminate them.Les règles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.
Comment
-
The latest edition of Australian Aviation has more on the system installed on the 787. Its an improved version of the Gust Aleviation System installed in the 777. It basically uses a cluster of air pressure sensors around the nose to predict and counteract using the flight control surfaces to some extent the bumps normally felt when flying in turbulent air.
Whilst it may be possible to add a similar system to a wire and bellcrank aircraft, it is simpler to add it to a FBW aircraft. This does not mean that FBW aircraft offer a smoother ride just because they are FBW - this is very much an add-on technology.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SYDCBRWOD View PostThe latest edition of Australian Aviation has more on the system installed on the 787. Its an improved version of the Gust Aleviation System installed in the 777. It basically uses a cluster of air pressure sensors around the nose to predict and counteract using the flight control surfaces to some extent the bumps normally felt when flying in turbulent air.
Whilst it may be possible to add a similar system to a wire and bellcrank aircraft, it is simpler to add it to a FBW aircraft. This does not mean that FBW aircraft offer a smoother ride just because they are FBW - this is very much an add-on technology.
Comment
-
Why isn't Boeing hyping it?
I dare say that you are going to feel turbulence regardless of any reasonable system.
Cessna 150 to 747....there is a fundamental similarity....the planes do fundamentally the same thing.
Then throw in turbulence which ranges from light to severe...
Dampen it....reduce it...sure
There is no practical way to make it go away......
Someone scared of flying is still going to feel some bumps and for some folks- any bump is enough.
Telling them that the plane is turbulence free is some serious false advertising.Les règles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 3WE View PostWhy isn't Boeing hyping it?
I dare say that you are going to feel turbulence regardless of any reasonable system.
Cessna 150 to 747....there is a fundamental similarity....the planes do fundamentally the same thing.
Then throw in turbulence which ranges from light to severe...
Dampen it....reduce it...sure
There is no practical way to make it go away......
Someone scared of flying is still going to feel some bumps and for some folks- any bump is enough.
Telling them that the plane is turbulence free is some serious false advertising.
It's like getting rid of the road unevenness. No shock absorber will do that, but some well designed systems can make for a smoother ride.
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
Comment
-
I also wouldn't be hyping it until its been installed, and proven reliably able to work.
Remember the problems the 777 had initially with supposedly making everyone airsick - being too active and too precise on the controls can be worse than just riding some of the bumps.
Its great they're looking into this sort of technology though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gabriel View PostNobody here is talking about getting rid of turbulence turbulence.
It's like getting rid of the road unevenness. No shock absorber will do that, but some well designed systems can make for a smoother ride.
I belive hyping it for fearful fliers is a bad move becuase I don't think it will give fearful fliers the rock-solid ride they need.
(I will claim some expertise as my mother would grab strangers during "lively" turbulence.)Les règles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 3WE View PostI belive hyping it for fearful fliers is a bad move becuase I don't think it will give fearful fliers the rock-solid ride they need.
And further, it would give the (true but better not telling to FoFers) impression that turbulence is frequent and annoying enough that Boeing and airlines are willing to invest quite a buck in a sophisticated device (ok, make that "software") to mitigate it.
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gabriel View PostPoint made.
And further, it would give the (true but better not telling to FoFers) impression that turbulence is frequent and annoying enough that Boeing and airlines are willing to invest quite a buck in a sophisticated device (ok, make that "software") to mitigate it.
Really, though, the impression that I get, after watching so many W.A.R. DVDs is that pilots do everything in their power to avoid turbulence, but that they can never (of course) avoid all of it.
The most turbulent flight I've ever been on was from KLAS to KDEN back in 1995, during July, on a UAL 737-300. It started immediately after take off-I mention that, because someone asked me how high off the ground we were. The whole flight was pretty bumpy, but that was in hot weather and almost the entire route is over mountains.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TeeVee View Postbah humbug! i like turbulence...it makes the flight more interesting
Reminds me of the old bushie on his first ever flight. Quite turbulent. He calls the hostess and asks for a meat pie - the stewardess says "I'm sorry sir, we don't have any meat pies - I can get you a sandwich or something?" The bushie replies: "Nah I'm after a pie". The stewardess, puzzled, asks: "What makes you think we have pies?" The bushie nods toward the passenger with a sick bag to her mouth in the next row "It's what all them other people are eating init?"
Comment
-
Originally posted by TeeVee View Postbah humbug! i like turbulence...it makes the flight more interesting
Comment
-
Originally posted by UALdave View PostWell it definitely makes things more interesting, no arguments there! Speaking of which, after take off, I almost always feel this sinking feeling, like I'm in an elevator going down, and it scares me, even though I know the plane is climbing. What the heck causes that??? I have a friend who's a flight engineer on a C-130H, and he said that the plane is actually loosing some altitude when the flaps retract all the way in. That doesn't make any sense to me, though.
Shortly after that, the plane will increase its vertical speed again and you feel like in an elevator starting to go up.
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
Comment
Comment