Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canon 70-300L IS upgrade?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Jan-Jasinski View Post
    I still consider getting one of them as 200mm for contrails with some 1024px crops isn't the best way to go perhaps...
    I hope your dad's rich or has a big house, because at this rate, you're going to waste a lot of money on a lot of junk.
    You've heard the last piece of advice from me, obviously, you have it all figured out already

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Taliesin View Post
      I hope your dad's rich or has a big house, because at this rate, you're going to waste a lot of money on a lot of junk.
      You've heard the last piece of advice from me, obviously, you have it all figured out already
      [SIGNATURE GOES HERE]

      Felipe Garcia

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Taliesin View Post
        I hope your dad's rich or has a big house, because at this rate, you're going to waste a lot of money on a lot of junk.
        You've heard the last piece of advice from me, obviously, you have it all figured out already
        ...

        You don't know my situation, if I have been working hard or not or whatever is going on. Junk you say? One TC is all the "junk" I consider buying. I can't afford a 70-200 and a 100-400L so you try to get 2 in 1, losing some quality but for me sometimes it's worth it, like identifying reg's...
        Flickr |Airliners.Net | Airplane-Pictures.Net | Jetphotos.Net

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Jan-Jasinski View Post
          ...

          You don't know my situation, if I have been working hard or not or whatever is going on. Junk you say? One TC is all the "junk" I consider buying. I can't afford a 70-200 and a 100-400L so you try to get 2 in 1, losing some quality but for me sometimes it's worth it, like identifying reg's...
          Will you shut up!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Jan-Jasinski View Post
            You don't know my situation, if I have been working hard or not or whatever is going on.
            Your situation is irrelevant, a bad choice is a bad choice
            Originally posted by Jan-Jasinski View Post
            Junk you say? One TC is all the "junk" I consider buying. I can't afford a 70-200 and a 100-400L so you try to get 2 in 1,
            You dont get 2 in 1. Dont you think if it were that easy, more people would do it? You get a piece of junk and that's it.
            If you cant afford lenses of advanced enthusiat or low end semi-pro quality, what kind of mediocre lens can you afford? A bad lens with a TC will yield HORRIBLE results.
            Originally posted by Jan-Jasinski View Post
            losing some quality but for me sometimes it's worth it, like identifying reg's...
            You lose image quality and you just blow up a bad image Einstein. Can you read the regs when you zoom into your photo to 200%? No you cant. What makes you think that with a TC you will be able to?
            If you want the reg, use flightradar24.com, it has a replay button that works as much as 2 weeks back.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Rtyrpics View Post
              Will you shut up!
              Yeah!
              Originally posted by Taliesin View Post
              Your situation is irrelevant, a bad choice is a bad choice
              You dont get 2 in 1. Dont you think if it were that easy, more people would do it? You get a piece of junk and that's it.
              If you cant afford lenses of advanced enthusiat or low end semi-pro quality, what kind of mediocre lens can you afford? A bad lens with a TC will yield HORRIBLE results.
              You lose image quality and you just blow up a bad image Einstein. Can you read the regs when you zoom into your photo to 200%? No you cant. What makes you think that with a TC you will be able to?
              If you want the reg, use flightradar24.com, it has a replay button that works as much as 2 weeks back.
              I was able to read the reg of a KAL 77W while at 400mm's.
              I'm done now, i'll shut up. Stupid kids nowadays like me...
              Flickr |Airliners.Net | Airplane-Pictures.Net | Jetphotos.Net

              Comment


              • #67
                OK folks, I think this thread has run it's course before it wildly jumps OT. Rick has acknowledged that he got his answer about the 70-300L so thanks everyone for their input. If you want to discuss the merits of TC's then please start a seperate thread.



                PS Rick, if you feel like posting any results from your new lens that you might like to show us then feel free to post it into a new thread, cheers!
                Last edited by B7772ADL; 2011-05-06, 09:02.

                Comment

                Working...
                X