Page 10 of 75 FirstFirst ... 891011122060 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 200 of 1499

Thread: New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

  1. #181
    Junior Member ronaldsim84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brianw999 View Post
    The Nam is soft, a little dark and low on contrast and the citilink is low on contrast.
    just edited the contrast on this one
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0687e2.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	442.5 KB 
ID:	7202

    how about this new pict?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1152.jpg 
Views:	45 
Size:	748.1 KB 
ID:	7203

    Thanks Sir.

  2. #182
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    3,629

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ronaldsim84 View Post
    just edited the contrast on this one
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0687e2.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	442.5 KB 
ID:	7202

    how about this new pict?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1152.jpg 
Views:	45 
Size:	748.1 KB 
ID:	7203

    Thanks Sir.
    Hi,
    And welcome to our forum, you took the right step !!


    1st one still lacks contrast - with the amount of light on the fuselage, not sure it could be most improved.

    2nd, sorry, but is totally destroyed by editing (something like shadow/highlight was used) - Remember planes should be white. Also see how foreground is pixelized


    Regards
    Alex
    Last edited by Alex - Spot-This !; 02-15-2017 at 02:27 PM.

  3. #183
    Junior Member MSTspotter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    61

    Default

    Hello

    Is this one okay, I also cant find 041 in the DB, and when I enter the regi and aircraft type I cant find the Falcon 20 ECM type

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3695.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	913.6 KB 
ID:	7205

  4. #184
    Super Moderator brianw999's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
    Posts
    11,334

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MSTspotter View Post
    Hello

    Is this one okay, I also cant find 041 in the DB, and when I enter the regi and aircraft type I cant find the Falcon 20 ECM type

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3695.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	913.6 KB 
ID:	7205
    Image looks OK to me. The type will need to be added to the database using the link on the upload page. For more info (c/n, type etc) go to www.scramble.nl and search the Norwegian Air Force using the Reg. Scramble is considered to be the bible of all things military.
    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !


  5. #185
    Dutch ....... ErwinS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    EHAM/SPL
    Posts
    3,654

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MSTspotter View Post
    Hello

    Is this one okay, I also cant find 041 in the DB, and when I enter the regi and aircraft type I cant find the Falcon 20 ECM type

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3695.jpg 
Views:	40 
Size:	913.6 KB 
ID:	7205
    https://www.jetphotos.com/showphotos...t+Falcon+20ECM
    “The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”

    Erwin


  6. #186
    Junior Member MSTspotter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    61

    Default

    Yes its in the DB, but I cant find it in the list of Falcon 20.. Only E or E-5

    Edit: The 041 is already in DB, but it doesnt show up when I enter the registration

  7. #187
    Junior Member MSTspotter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brianw999 View Post
    Image looks OK to me. The type will need to be added to the database using the link on the upload page. For more info (c/n, type etc) go to www.scramble.nl and search the Norwegian Air Force using the Reg. Scramble is considered to be the bible of all things military.
    Thanks Brian!

  8. #188
    Dutch ....... ErwinS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    EHAM/SPL
    Posts
    3,654

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MSTspotter View Post
    Yes its in the DB, but I cant find it in the list of Falcon 20.. Only E or E-5

    Edit: The 041 is already in DB, but it doesnt show up when I enter the registration
    It is in the list.

    Brgds
    “The only time you have too much fuel is when you’re on fire.”

    Erwin


  9. #189
    Super Moderator brianw999's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
    Posts
    11,334

    Default

    My bad, the new upload page seems to load in a progressive way where you need to start each field with the first few letters. If the aircraft is in the database it will load.
    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !


  10. #190
    Junior Member MSTspotter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ErwinS View Post
    It is in the list.

    Brgds
    Thanks Im now seeing the Dassault in the list under de 041

    Regards

  11. #191
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    São Miguel island, Azores
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Hello! This photos were rejected, are they ok now?

    1. Rejected due to Overexposed and Too much or too little contrast:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1082psax1200.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	939.4 KB 
ID:	7208

    2. Rejected due to Overexposed, Dark / Underexposed, Too much or too little contrast

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0220psax1200.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	675.3 KB 
ID:	7209

    3. Rejected due to Oversharpen, JPG compression artefacts

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_3703psax1200.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	804.2 KB 
ID:	7210

    4. Rejected due to harsh contrast and some weird fuzzy lines on some edges

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6130psax1200.jpg 
Views:	35 
Size:	822.7 KB 
ID:	7211

    5. Is this one ok?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6616psx1200.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	1,007.7 KB 
ID:	7217

    Thanks for any help/suggestions

  12. #192
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    13

    Default What do you think?

    What do you guys think?thanks Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4412.JPG 
Views:	37 
Size:	62.8 KB 
ID:	7220

  13. #193
    Junior Member ronaldsim84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    6

    Default

    1.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0748.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	519.9 KB 
ID:	7221
    2.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1568-1280px.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	768.8 KB 
ID:	7222
    3.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1842-1280.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	418.1 KB 
ID:	7224
    4.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1851-1280px.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	745.3 KB 
ID:	7225
    5.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_2059-1280.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	529.0 KB 
ID:	7226
    is it good ?
    (nb: all watermark will be delete)

  14. #194
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Budapest
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Hey JP crew!
    Can I get some prescreening?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-GKXJ.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	314.0 KB 
ID:	7227

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HA-LXN.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	270.1 KB 
ID:	7228

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-EZBG.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	324.6 KB 
ID:	7229

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HA-LWR.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	230.9 KB 
ID:	7230

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EI-EMP.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	272.9 KB 
ID:	7231

    Thanks, Aron

  15. #195
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    33

    Default

    hello, is this ok?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-DBCD.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	734.0 KB 
ID:	7233

    thanks

  16. #196
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    808

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickyabela View Post
    What do you guys think?thanks Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4412.JPG 
Views:	37 
Size:	62.8 KB 
ID:	7220
    Dark, off-center, and heavily compressed. Would be an instant rejection I'm afraid.

  17. #197
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    808

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ronaldsim84 View Post
    1.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0748.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	519.9 KB 
ID:	7221
    2.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1568-1280px.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	768.8 KB 
ID:	7222
    3.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1842-1280.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	418.1 KB 
ID:	7224
    4.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1851-1280px.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	745.3 KB 
ID:	7225
    5.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_2059-1280.jpg 
Views:	37 
Size:	529.0 KB 
ID:	7226
    is it good ?
    (nb: all watermark will be delete)
    1. can only comment on upload-sized images for quality, though this one is backlit and there's nothing you can do to fix that.
    2-4. a little soft in places, but otherwise ok
    5. needs a tighter crop, especially on the left.

  18. #198
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    808

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mester Aron View Post
    Hey JP crew!
    Can I get some prescreening?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-GKXJ.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	314.0 KB 
ID:	7227

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HA-LXN.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	270.1 KB 
ID:	7228

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-EZBG.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	324.6 KB 
ID:	7229

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HA-LWR.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	230.9 KB 
ID:	7230

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EI-EMP.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	272.9 KB 
ID:	7231

    Thanks, Aron
    Quality looks ok to me for all.

  19. #199
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    808

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fabinho1314 View Post
    hello, is this ok?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-DBCD.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	734.0 KB 
ID:	7233

    thanks
    Horizon maybe looks a little off, but quality should be ok.

  20. #200
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    808

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
    Hello! This photos were rejected, are they ok now?

    1. Rejected due to Overexposed and Too much or too little contrast:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1082psax1200.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	939.4 KB 
ID:	7208

    2. Rejected due to Overexposed, Dark / Underexposed, Too much or too little contrast

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0220psax1200.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	675.3 KB 
ID:	7209

    3. Rejected due to Oversharpen, JPG compression artefacts

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_3703psax1200.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	804.2 KB 
ID:	7210

    4. Rejected due to harsh contrast and some weird fuzzy lines on some edges

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6130psax1200.jpg 
Views:	35 
Size:	822.7 KB 
ID:	7211

    5. Is this one ok?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6616psx1200.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	1,007.7 KB 
ID:	7217

    Thanks for any help/suggestions
    For 1, 2, 4, the light is still pretty dark/harsh.
    3 & 5 would be ok for me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •