Page 89 of 100 FirstFirst ... 3979878889909199 ... LastLast
Results 1,761 to 1,780 of 1993

Thread: New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

  1. #1761
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    68

    Default

    hello JP team please prescreen
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	n315pe-jp.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	584.7 KB 
ID:	9835 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	n670cp.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	829.5 KB 
ID:	9836 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	msp005-highrairliners.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	711.5 KB 
ID:	9839 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ti-bdw.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	714.1 KB 
ID:	9840 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	xa-mto.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	588.7 KB 
ID:	9866
    thanks

  2. #1762
    Junior Member vcruvinel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    80

    Default

    What about now, dlowwa?

    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-HTVC.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	407.4 KB 
ID:	9842

    and this one? I took in dusk time

    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EI-DCJ.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	378.1 KB 
ID:	9843

  3. #1763
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    16

    Default

    JP Crew, could you pre-screen these photos?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PP-SCN CORRIGIDA SRGB.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	459.3 KB 
ID:	9858Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PR-ONL CORRIGIDO SRGB.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	439.5 KB 
ID:	9859Click image for larger version. 

Name:	pr-gxq corrigida.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	491.8 KB 
ID:	9860

    Btw, these photos would be rejected by backlit?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PR-GUO CORRIGIDO SRGB.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	456.5 KB 
ID:	9861Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PR-ONP CORRIGIDA SRBG.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	541.6 KB 
ID:	9862

    Big thanks!

  4. #1764
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Hi, appreciate advice on these 2 pls.

    trying to make sure I understand the revised upload guidelines. Illustrating spotting location - the aircraft seems to be of sufficient size in frame to possibly be entered in aircraft reg field on upload? Or would you suggest using the airport in both fields? its a first light shot so i'd put in 'night' and also 'airport overview'?
    Any other points appreciated.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-ATUM-spotting.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	904.2 KB 
ID:	9864

    Another go at getting an aircraft over the chapel on short finals. Would you see this composition as acceptable?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-AICE-overchapel.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	1.27 MB 
ID:	9865

    Cheers Tony

  5. #1765
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    12,708

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 777MAN View Post
    Hi, appreciate advice on these 2 pls.

    trying to make sure I understand the revised upload guidelines. Illustrating spotting location - the aircraft seems to be of sufficient size in frame to possibly be entered in aircraft reg field on upload? Or would you suggest using the airport in both fields? its a first light shot so i'd put in 'night' and also 'airport overview'?
    Any other points appreciated.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-ATUM-spotting.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	904.2 KB 
ID:	9864

    Another go at getting an aircraft over the chapel on short finals. Would you see this composition as acceptable?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-AICE-overchapel.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	1.27 MB 
ID:	9865

    Cheers Tony
    As we require an airport area to be in view for a spotting location photo, none of them are acceptable.

  6. #1766
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HS-TJA.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	527.3 KB 
ID:	9868

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B-LNZ.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	449.2 KB 
ID:	9869

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HS-ABR.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	506.9 KB 
ID:	9870

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9V-TRN.jpg 
Views:	5 
Size:	579.1 KB 
ID:	9871

    Would these be OK? The aircraft were passing over the sea, so they have some kind of tint.

  7. #1767
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Minneapolis,USA
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Hi Team,

    Please let me know if this is passable.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N820SY_10_11.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	965.9 KB 
ID:	9872

    Thanks,
    Ninad

  8. #1768
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    957

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eduardo Paix„o Silva View Post
    Yes please but the last two i think any screener can give their advice. Thanks Dlowwa
    In that case the first should be ok, but the second is borderline dark.

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Thanks for the previous feedback! I have more slots to upload, so how are these shots? Thank you again, it is much appreciated!

    Attachment 9811
    Attachment 9815
    Attachment 9816
    Attachment 9817
    Attachment 9818
    White balance is a bit warm on the first two, but otherwise I don't see any major issues.

  9. #1769
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    957

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crisquijano View Post
    Hello JP Crew. Please check this image for me. Thank you.

    1. Attachment 9820
    2.Attachment 9821
    3.Attachment 9822
    4.Attachment 9833
    5.Attachment 9834
    1. contrast
    2. borderline contrast
    3. soft
    4. soft/blurry
    5. borderline contrast

    Quote Originally Posted by pauwelsc View Post
    Looking forward to your opinion! Thanks

    1. Attachment 9828 2. Attachment 9829 3. Attachment 9830 4. Attachment 9831 5. Attachment 9832
    1. borderline soft
    2. soft, horizon
    3. ok
    4. backlit
    5. ok

  10. #1770
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    957

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Degupukas View Post
    hello JP team please prescreen
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	n315pe-jp.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	584.7 KB 
ID:	9835 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	n670cp.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	829.5 KB 
ID:	9836 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	msp005-highrairliners.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	711.5 KB 
ID:	9839 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ti-bdw.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	714.1 KB 
ID:	9840 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	xa-mto.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	588.7 KB 
ID:	9866
    thanks
    1. ok
    2. color
    3. dark
    4. ok
    5. color/contrast

    Quote Originally Posted by vcruvinel View Post
    What about now, dlowwa?

    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F-HTVC.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	407.4 KB 
ID:	9842

    and this one? I took in dusk time

    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EI-DCJ.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	378.1 KB 
ID:	9843
    1. contrast still low
    2. soft/blurry

  11. #1771
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    957

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabrielmagacho View Post
    JP Crew, could you pre-screen these photos?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PP-SCN CORRIGIDA SRGB.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	459.3 KB 
ID:	9858Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PR-ONL CORRIGIDO SRGB.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	439.5 KB 
ID:	9859Click image for larger version. 

Name:	pr-gxq corrigida.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	491.8 KB 
ID:	9860
    A bit dark/flat, but probably ok.

    Quote Originally Posted by gabrielmagacho View Post
    Btw, these photos would be rejected by backlit?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PR-GUO CORRIGIDO SRGB.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	456.5 KB 
ID:	9861Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PR-ONP CORRIGIDA SRBG.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	541.6 KB 
ID:	9862
    Backlit no, but dark/contrast/obstruction, yes.

    Quote Originally Posted by MadridSpotter View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HS-TJA.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	527.3 KB 
ID:	9868

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B-LNZ.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	449.2 KB 
ID:	9869

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HS-ABR.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	506.9 KB 
ID:	9870

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9V-TRN.jpg 
Views:	5 
Size:	579.1 KB 
ID:	9871

    Would these be OK? The aircraft were passing over the sea, so they have some kind of tint.
    Contrast is too low for all of them. Also a bit soft.

    Quote Originally Posted by ninadranade View Post
    Hi Team,

    Please let me know if this is passable.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N820SY_10_11.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	965.9 KB 
ID:	9872

    Thanks,
    Ninad
    Soft, and color looks a little oversaturated.

  12. #1772
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. contrast
    2. borderline contrast
    3. soft
    4. soft/blurry
    5. borderline contrast

    1. borderline soft
    2. soft, horizon
    3. ok
    4. backlit
    5. ok
    What about now?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FEAK.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	9873

  13. #1773
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    957

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pauwelsc View Post
    What about now?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C-FEAK.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	9873
    Ok for me.

  14. #1774
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback dlowwa!

  15. #1775
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Ok for me.
    Thanks for doing all the pre-screens! It must be a lot of work...

  16. #1776
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Minneapolis,USA
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Thanks Dana !

  17. #1777
    Member crisquijano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    103

    Default

    First of all, a big thank you to all the JP crew members.

    Please provide your opinion on these ones. thank you

    1.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	COPA_HP-1536CMP_17SEP17_1200_profile.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	581.4 KB 
ID:	9877
    2.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Condor_D-ABUB_16JAN17_1200_paralela.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	912.0 KB 
ID:	9878

    3.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SOUTHWEST_N7731A_17SEP17_1200_profile.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	705.7 KB 
ID:	9879
    4.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	UNITED_N35204_17SEP17_1200_profile.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	563.0 KB 
ID:	9883
    5.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	TACA N684TA 12MAR17 1600 charol.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	913.9 KB 
ID:	9899

  18. #1778
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    A bit dark/flat, but probably ok.

    Backlit no, but dark/contrast/obstruction, yes.
    Thank you again Dlowwa. It looks better now?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PP-SCN CORRIGIDA DLOWWA.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	468.6 KB 
ID:	9880Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PR-ONL CORRIGIDA DLOWWA.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	460.5 KB 
ID:	9881Click image for larger version. 

Name:	pr-gxq CORRIGIDA DLOWWA.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	441.2 KB 
ID:	9882

  19. #1779
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    68

    Default

    hi jp team
    What about now
    color that's ok?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	n670cp-2.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	792.0 KB 
ID:	9884

    dark?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	msp005-jp.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	747.1 KB 
ID:	9885

    color/contrast?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	xa-mto-2.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	546.2 KB 
ID:	9886

    prescreen
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	hp-1764pst-jp.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	416.7 KB 
ID:	9887 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ti-azt-jp.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	578.1 KB 
ID:	9888

    Dlowwa thanks for your time

  20. #1780
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Thoughts on these ones? I am not sure about the Aer Lingus, I hope you can prove me wrong. I equalised all the pictures and in my opinion, no halos detected... Thanks!

    1. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EI-DVH.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	942.8 KB 
ID:	9894 2. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EI-FML.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.30 MB 
ID:	9895 3. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	G-EZOR.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.57 MB 
ID:	9896 4. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	g-zbav.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.13 MB 
ID:	9897 5. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	oo-snf.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	983.1 KB 
ID:	9898

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •