Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Airport Overview - Ramp



    1. soft/blurry
    2. borderline soft
    3. soft
    4. ok
    5. noisy
    I sharpened 1, 2 and 3 so normally it should be fixed now... I give up on the Swiss, conditions weren't good.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
      N751AN: aircraft is a bit too low, the photo lacks contrast and the photo itself is slightly leaning to the right. But all this should be fairly easy to fix.
      PR-GUM: slightly leaning to the right and soft
      PT-TMA: not bad, maybe a bit too soft
      It seems better now? For the American B772, which photo would be more correct in terms of rotation? Thanks for your time and help!
      Click image for larger version

Name:	n751an CORRIGIDA PS2.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	566.4 KB
ID:	1017891Click image for larger version

Name:	n751an CORRIGIDA PS2 +0,8.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	524.1 KB
ID:	1019186Click image for larger version

Name:	pr-gum PS2 CORRIGIDA.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	553.3 KB
ID:	1019187

      Comment


      • hi jp crew please prescreen
        Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-anv-airliners-high75154027.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	802.9 KB
ID:	1019188Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-aob-airliners-high70144029.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	900.4 KB
ID:	1019189Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-aot-airlinershigh70154030.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	750.6 KB
ID:	1019190 Click image for larger version

Name:	n526vl-jp-high70154030.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	680.1 KB
ID:	1019201Click image for larger version

Name:	n77537-airliners-high70154030.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	885.7 KB
ID:	1019207
        thanks

        Comment


        • Click image for larger version

Name:	jp31.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	742.8 KB
ID:	1019191
          hello is this okay?
          in terms of edit, not quality, as its already cropped for jp
          cheers

          Comment


          • I edited these ones today. I think there is sometimes some slight compression in the sky. Would it get rejected due to that? Thanks!

            1. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIQB.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	893.7 KB
ID:	1019196 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LOX.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	969.5 KB
ID:	1019197 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-EVC.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	777.7 KB
ID:	1019198 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-CELV.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	994.2 KB
ID:	1019199 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-JZHF.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.00 MB
ID:	1019200

            Comment


            • Good, he would be so kind to give me an opinion of these shots. Thank you very much.!
              1.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1833.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	574.1 KB
ID:	1019202 2.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1682.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	603.4 KB
ID:	1019203 3.Click image for larger version

Name:	n2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	667.5 KB
ID:	1019204 4.Click image for larger version

Name:	f.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	514.9 KB
ID:	1019205 5.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1748.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	400.0 KB
ID:	1019206

              Comment


              • Originally posted by gabrielmagacho View Post
                It seems better now? For the American B772, which photo would be more correct in terms of rotation? Thanks for your time and help!
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]9998[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9999[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]10000[/ATTACH]
                First AA is better. GOL needs CCW rotation.

                Originally posted by Degupukas View Post
                hi jp crew please prescreen
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]10002[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]10003[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]10004[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]10016[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]10025[/ATTACH]
                thanks
                1. right side soft/blurry
                2. ok
                3. right side soft/blurry
                4. ok
                5. ok

                Originally posted by yazn View Post
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]10005[/ATTACH]
                hello is this okay?
                in terms of edit, not quality, as its already cropped for jp
                cheers
                Soft and obstructed, unfortunately.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                  I edited these ones today. I think there is sometimes some slight compression in the sky. Would it get rejected due to that? Thanks!

                  1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10010[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10011[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10012[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10013[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]10014[/ATTACH]
                  1. check horizon
                  2. horizon
                  3. dark, soft, almost cut off
                  4. soft
                  5. ok

                  Originally posted by Ivan Jimenez Rojas View Post
                  Good, he would be so kind to give me an opinion of these shots. Thank you very much.!
                  1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10020[/ATTACH] 2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10021[/ATTACH] 3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10022[/ATTACH] 4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10023[/ATTACH] 5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]10024[/ATTACH]
                  Would be rejected for:
                  1. color, contrast
                  2. color, contrast
                  3. color, contrast
                  4. contrast
                  5. color, contrast

                  Comment


                  • Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9420.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	961.6 KB
ID:	1019210
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9426.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	725.8 KB
ID:	1019211

                    Two more for pre-screening.
                    Note: Both were taken in foggy conditions.

                    Comment


                    • Hello JP-Team.

                      Would ask you about pre-screening some of my photos.
                      I took those pictutes after sunset.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3218-01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	505.6 KB
ID:	1019215

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3247-01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	394.6 KB
ID:	1019216

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3260-01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	363.4 KB
ID:	1019217

                      Thank you.
                      My_photos. Enjoy!

                      Comment


                      • Hello JP team, could you please check the following pics?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	00405611.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	734.3 KB
ID:	1019218
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	00555611.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	527.6 KB
ID:	1019219
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	00895611.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	726.3 KB
ID:	1019220
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	00975611.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	713.2 KB
ID:	1019221
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	00155611.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	681.1 KB
ID:	1019222

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by ILLICh View Post
                          Hello JP-Team.

                          Would ask you about pre-screening some of my photos.
                          I took those pictutes after sunset.

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]10034[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]10035[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]10036[/ATTACH]

                          Thank you.
                          1 and 2: Contrast (dull looking aircraft, with a washed out grey overcast background)
                          3: borderline, a tad dark but also soft.
                          My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Luichi74 View Post
                            Hello JP team, could you please check the following pics?

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]10037[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]10038[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]10039[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]10040[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]10041[/ATTACH]
                            1: soft and lack of contrast
                            2: blurry and lack of contrast
                            3: soft, leaning to the right and lack of contrast
                            4: soft, too low and lack of contrast
                            5: borderline OK, maybe you can leave a bit more space around the aircraft
                            My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
                              1 and 2: Contrast (dull looking aircraft, with a washed out grey overcast background)
                              3: borderline, a tad dark but also soft.
                              Thanks. Will keep it for my private collection.
                              My_photos. Enjoy!

                              Comment


                              • I adapted the pictures you screened before. I sharpened the Jet2 as suggested (not included) and I changed the horizon level off the Germanwings and Air Nostrum. I added 3 extra pictures too. Thanks for doing this!

                                1. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIQB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	983.1 KB
ID:	1019227 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIQE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1019228 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LOX.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1019229 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-ENS.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	852.5 KB
ID:	1019230 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	PH-HZD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1019231

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X