Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Good dloewa. would be kind enough to give me an opinion on these catches. Thank you very much.
    1Click image for larger version

Name:	27112016-DSC_1542 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	336.9 KB
ID:	1017408 2Click image for larger version

Name:	18072017-DSC_0148.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	715.2 KB
ID:	1017410 3Click image for larger version

Name:	17092016-DSC_3699.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	643.6 KB
ID:	1017411

    Comment


    • hi JP crew please prescreen
      Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-avf.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	743.0 KB
ID:	1017418Click image for larger version

Name:	n605gn.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	346.8 KB
ID:	1017419Click image for larger version

Name:	yv2918.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	498.7 KB
ID:	1017420Click image for larger version

Name:	G-YMMD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	646.7 KB
ID:	1017421Click image for larger version

Name:	n41gj-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	591.3 KB
ID:	1017422
      thanks a lots

      Comment


      • Dear Team,

        Please let me know if this is passable.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	D-ABUP_09_29.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1017423

        Thanks for your time.

        Thanks,
        Ninad

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Ivan Jimenez Rojas View Post
          Good dloewa. would be kind enough to give me an opinion on these catches. Thank you very much.
          1[ATTACH=CONFIG]9472[/ATTACH] 2[ATTACH=CONFIG]9474[/ATTACH] 3[ATTACH=CONFIG]9475[/ATTACH]
          The first is rather dark and a tad soft which should be fixable. The other two are backlit.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Degupukas View Post
            hi JP crew please prescreen
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]9482[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9483[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9484[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9485[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9486[/ATTACH]
            thanks a lots
            First and third are a tad dark, second is a tad soft, third also has a strange color. Fourth looks over sharpened, fifth seems to have too much contrast.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ninadranade View Post
              Dear Team,

              Please let me know if this is passable.

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]9487[/ATTACH]

              Thanks for your time.

              Thanks,
              Ninad

              Sorry, but this one looks blurry to me

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
                Hello Dlowwa, when possible can you give me your opinion on these. Thanks again and have a nice weekend
                First has some heat haze or compression affecting it. Other two should be ok.

                Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                Hey JP-team

                Could you pre-screen these ones?

                1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9463[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9464[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9465[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9466[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9467[/ATTACH]

                Number 1 is maybe oversharpened and color, number 2 soft not sure about number 4 either (color/ contrast).

                Thanks a lot for this opportunity to do the pre-screening, it's really useful for me. The pictures you pre-screen are most of the time accepted and I really learn a lot from your corrections. Again thanks!
                Good guesses

                1. horizon, borderline dark, borderline oversharpen/heat haze
                2. soft
                3. borderline soft
                4. obstruction, dark
                5. soft

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
                  Hey, good evening!

                  What do you think? Acceptable or backlit yet?
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]9468[/ATTACH]

                  Thanks a lot, have a nice weekend
                  Probably acceptable for lighting, but heat hazed and very soft.

                  Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
                  Thanks for the previous comments on the Apache, have raised exposure and reduced noise - how do you think it is now? Also, if anyone has any time to check the other four I'd be very grateful. Thank you!

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]9469[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]9470[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]9471[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]9473[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]9476[/ATTACH]
                  1. still borderline for contrast, and compression/noise maybe an issue now
                  2. bit dark, but ok for me
                  3. same
                  4. color, dark
                  5. ok

                  Comment


                  • Weather Conditions were not the best this day, so i wonder if these are still ok for upload.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9175.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	337.4 KB
ID:	1017425
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9217.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	326.0 KB
ID:	1017426
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9226.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	352.4 KB
ID:	1017427

                    Comment


                    • Hi JP Team... please evaluate these shots. Thank you!

                      1.Click image for larger version

Name:	IBERIA_EC-MLB_29SEP17_1600_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.29 MB
ID:	1017429
                      2.Click image for larger version

Name:	Estelar_YV2918_29SEP17_1600_34slanding.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	663.9 KB
ID:	1017453
                      3.Click image for larger version

Name:	COPA_HK-4456_29SEP17_1600_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	969.7 KB
ID:	1017455 Would this be considered "Similar" to https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8674756?
                      4.Click image for larger version

Name:	ALASKA_N516AS_29SEP17_1200_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	543.4 KB
ID:	1017456
                      5.Click image for larger version

Name:	ALASKA_N516AS_29SEP17_1600_head.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	681.3 KB
ID:	1017457

                      Comment


                      • Hey JP-team

                        I updated some of the previous pictures you pre-screened and added some new ones.

                        1. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-CPG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1017430 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-FXN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	869.1 KB
ID:	1017431 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZIJ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	371.4 KB
ID:	1017432 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-ZBAK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	608.7 KB
ID:	1017433 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-IJM.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	923.1 KB
ID:	1017434

                        Number 1, 2, 3 and 5 were all rejected before as being soft. I tried to sharpen it a bit more.

                        Thanks again!

                        Comment


                        • hello JP team please prescreen
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	pr-zey-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	730.8 KB
ID:	1017435 Click image for larger version

Name:	msp017.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	900.3 KB
ID:	1017436 Click image for larger version

Name:	n87513.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	625.9 KB
ID:	1017437Click image for larger version

Name:	n563wn.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	765.9 KB
ID:	1017458
                          thanks

                          Comment


                          • Hi! I have edited the TUI 787 a little by adjusting the white balance and increasing exposure. For the others, well, who knows...! Thank you very much again

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	G-FDZS_GCTS_3158.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	742.3 KB
ID:	1017443
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	G-TUID_GCTS_3285.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	491.6 KB
ID:	1017444
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	G-VINE_EGPF_TEST_2668.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	633.7 KB
ID:	1017445
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	B-2032_EGLL_TEST_7507.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	549.4 KB
ID:	1017446
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	LY-YEH_GCTS_3167.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	675.9 KB
ID:	1017447

                            Comment


                            • [QUOTE=dlowwa;653574]First has some heat haze or compression affecting it. Other two should be ok.

                              Hello dlowwa, about the first one is it better? If its really heat haze i will keep it to my personal collection.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	CSTRFps2x1024.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	627.1 KB
ID:	1017451

                              Just out of curiosity, what do you think of this one:
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5602ps1x1024.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	409.0 KB
ID:	1017452

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                Other than brightness, I don't see much difference. There is a light violet/blue cast to both images, probably just needs a slight WB adjustment.
                                Since it is a new registration I'm loosing my slots quickly and would like to get an opinion if the light violet/blue cast is no longer visible https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0...VdNd1VRMkplWU0
                                Here is the rejected one https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6117375

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X