Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by KyleMcKinlay View Post
    Hello, are these shots acceptable to upload? The Jet2 737 was previously rejected due to the midtones being too dark according to the histogram. Also, the TUI 737 was something I was very unsure of, but curious to ask about. It was turning, and I panned with it, although it has left an effect with only the nose sharp. Many thanks.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9750[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9751[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9753[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9754[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]9755[/ATTACH]
    1. dark, horizon
    2. borderline contrast
    3. ok
    4. blurry
    5. ok

    Originally posted by crisquijano View Post
    Hi, please pre-screen these photos. thank you in advance.

    1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9760[/ATTACH]
    2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9762[/ATTACH]
    3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9763[/ATTACH]
    4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9764[/ATTACH]
    5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9774[/ATTACH]
    All have a slight yellow/green cast to them, but should otherwise be ok.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Ivan Jimenez Rojas View Post
      Good, he would be so kind to give me an opinion of these shots. Thank you very much.!
      1[ATTACH=CONFIG]9765[/ATTACH] 2[ATTACH=CONFIG]9766[/ATTACH] 3[ATTACH=CONFIG]9767[/ATTACH] 4[ATTACH=CONFIG]9768[/ATTACH] 5[ATTACH=CONFIG]9769[/ATTACH]
      1. contrast
      2. soft
      3. soft, contrast
      4. soft
      5. soft, contrast

      Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
      Can any member of the JP crew could give me prescreen in this shots? Thanks

      1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9770[/ATTACH]
      2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9771[/ATTACH]
      3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9772[/ATTACH]

      Thanks!
      1. borderline overprocessed (faint halos)
      2. contrast
      3. contrast

      Originally posted by gabrielmagacho View Post
      Hey! Someone of JP crew could pre-screen these photos? Big thanks!
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]9776[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9777[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9778[/ATTACH]
      1. oversharpened
      2. borderline contrast
      3. oversharpened

      Comment


      • [QUOTE=dlowwa;653939]1. soft
        2. ok
        3. soft
        4. borderline contrast
        5. below minimum upload size requirements

        I sharpened 1 and 3 a bit and updated the borderline contrast

        Click image for larger version

Name:	PH-CDFedit.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	752.6 KB
ID:	1017721 Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-IJWverv.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1017706 Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZOR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.48 MB
ID:	1017705
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • Hi,
          Thank you for previous prescreening.
          I reworked the Norwegian Dreamliner, and ask for prescreening the Latam B-767 thank you.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	LN-LNA-B-787-Norwegian-copy.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	898.8 KB
ID:	1017707
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
            1. contrast
            2. soft
            3. soft, contrast
            4. soft
            5. soft, contrast



            1. borderline overprocessed (faint halos)
            2. contrast
            3. contrast



            1. oversharpened
            2. borderline contrast
            3. oversharpened
            dlowwa, see it`s better now. Thanks!

            1. Click image for larger version

Name:	CS-TTY.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	374.4 KB
ID:	1017709
            2. Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HTVC.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	359.6 KB
ID:	1017710

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
              How about now Pamela? Thanks

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]9743[/ATTACH]

              This one was rejected due to dark/underexposed, is it ok now:

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]9773[/ATTACH]

              Is this night shot ok:

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]9775[/ATTACH]
              Some help please =)

              Comment


              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                1. oversharpened
                2. borderline contrast
                3. oversharpened
                Thanks Dlowwa. I've tried to correct the oversharpening in both. If it's not corrected at all, I still appreciate your time!
                Click image for larger version

Name:	testegxb?.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	410.9 KB
ID:	1017711Click image for larger version

Name:	avl correcao.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	462.4 KB
ID:	1017712

                Comment


                • Backlit?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	170926_FEDEX_N123FE_PHX__BACKLIT_BRUSH_DSC_0893.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	862.4 KB
ID:	1017713

                  Comments would be much appreciated. Thank you.
                  Malcolm

                  Comment


                  • hello jp team please prescreen
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	c6-bfe-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	751.7 KB
ID:	1017714 Click image for larger version

Name:	N17229-jp.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	638.4 KB
ID:	1017715 Click image for larger version

Name:	xa-xii.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	242.9 KB
ID:	1017716 Click image for larger version

Name:	an-140.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	335.1 KB
ID:	1017717 Click image for larger version

Name:	ti-bbm.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	748.7 KB
ID:	1017718
                    thanks

                    Comment


                    • 1.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01143.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	714.5 KB
ID:	1017719 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01112.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	723.2 KB
ID:	1017720
                      HI dlowwa, how about these two?

                      Comment


                      • Good, he would be so kind to give me an opinion of these shots. Thank you very much.!
                        1Click image for larger version

Name:	08102017-DSC_0712.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	723.4 KB
ID:	1017722 2Click image for larger version

Name:	09102017-DSC_0919.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	806.9 KB
ID:	1017723 3Click image for larger version

Name:	09102017-DSC_1001.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	768.6 KB
ID:	1017724 4Click image for larger version

Name:	08102017-DSC_0697.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	461.2 KB
ID:	1017725 5Click image for larger version

Name:	08102017-DSC_0701.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	554.3 KB
ID:	1017726

                        Comment


                        • [QUOTE=pauwelsc;653944]
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          1. soft
                          2. ok
                          3. soft
                          4. borderline contrast
                          5. below minimum upload size requirements

                          I sharpened 1 and 3 a bit and updated the borderline contrast

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]9801[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9786[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9785[/ATTACH]
                          Second is probably ok, but other two still quite soft.

                          Originally posted by Ellx View Post
                          Hi,
                          Thank you for previous prescreening.
                          I reworked the Norwegian Dreamliner, and ask for prescreening the Latam B-767 thank you.
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]9787[/ATTACH]
                          Dark/contrast rejections likely for both.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
                            dlowwa, see it`s better now. Thanks!

                            1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9789[/ATTACH]
                            2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9790[/ATTACH]
                            First is probably ok, but second still has low contrast.

                            Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
                            Some help please =)
                            I can pass along a message to Pamela if you'd like.

                            Originally posted by gabrielmagacho View Post
                            Thanks Dlowwa. I've tried to correct the oversharpening in both. If it's not corrected at all, I still appreciate your time!
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]9791[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9792[/ATTACH]
                            Better. I'd add them if it were me.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by MTPatx View Post
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]9793[/ATTACH]

                              Comments would be much appreciated. Thank you.
                              Malcolm
                              Does not appear to be backlit.

                              Originally posted by Degupukas View Post
                              hello jp team please prescreen
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]9794[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9795[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9796[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9797[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9798[/ATTACH]
                              thanks
                              1. ok
                              2. backlit, but kind of works here
                              3. borderline contrast/overprocessed
                              4. dark
                              5. ok

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by jasonc7879 View Post
                                1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9799[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9800[/ATTACH]
                                HI dlowwa, how about these two?
                                Both would be rejected:

                                1. obstruction
                                2. soft, noisy

                                Originally posted by Ivan Jimenez Rojas View Post
                                Good, he would be so kind to give me an opinion of these shots. Thank you very much.!
                                1[ATTACH=CONFIG]9802[/ATTACH] 2[ATTACH=CONFIG]9803[/ATTACH] 3[ATTACH=CONFIG]9804[/ATTACH] 4[ATTACH=CONFIG]9805[/ATTACH] 5[ATTACH=CONFIG]9806[/ATTACH]
                                1. ok
                                2. ok
                                3. soft, contrast
                                4. soft/blurry, contrast
                                5. soft/blurry, contrast

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X