Page 103 of 103 FirstFirst ... 35393101102103
Results 2,041 to 2,059 of 2059

Thread: New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

  1. #2041
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pawelm View Post
    Hi,

    Unfortunatley all three were rejected for being to dark and SAS also for contrast. Are they better now?
    Attachment 7352Attachment 7353 Attachment 7354


    Thanks
    All still borderline for contrast, especially the first, but I'd be ok with the last two.

  2. #2042
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by harry1 View Post
    Hello,
    are they ok for upload?

    Tks
    Harry
    Some slight heat distortion, and not sure what you've done to the sky in the top right corner of the EK, but otherwise should be ok.

  3. #2043
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    141

    Default

    Hello,

    Can I get an opinion on this one?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HA-LYH_2.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	799.2 KB 
ID:	7375

    Thanks

  4. #2044
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    3,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pawelm View Post
    Hello,

    Can I get an opinion on this one?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HA-LYH_2.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	799.2 KB 
ID:	7375

    Thanks
    Hi,
    Won't be accepted due to contrast and burned out whites in sky

    Regards
    Alex

  5. #2045
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    141

    Default

    Thanks.
    So maybe this one?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HA-LYH.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	911.9 KB 
ID:	7378

    thanks

  6. #2046
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pawelm View Post
    Thanks.
    So maybe this one?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HA-LYH.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	911.9 KB 
ID:	7378

    thanks
    Hi, same as the previous one.

    Regards
    Sebastian

  7. #2047
    Junior Member ronaldsim84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Hi All... Please advice for my pict below, is this acceptable?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4763.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	375.3 KB 
ID:	7382

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4814.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	347.3 KB 
ID:	7383

    Thank You...

  8. #2048
    JetPhotos.Net Crew meneses24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Josť, Costa Rica
    Posts
    528

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ronaldsim84 View Post
    Hi All... Please advice for my pict below, is this acceptable?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4763.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	375.3 KB 
ID:	7382

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4814.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	347.3 KB 
ID:	7383

    Thank You...
    Hi, both look bit soft and blurry. As well as the custom watermark!

  9. #2049
    Junior Member ronaldsim84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by meneses24 View Post
    Hi, both look bit soft and blurry. As well as the custom watermark!
    could you tell me which is look bit soft dan blurry? watermark will be remove, i wont using watermark for JP's photo

  10. #2050
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ronaldsim84 View Post
    could you tell me which is look bit soft dan blurry? watermark will be remove, i wont using watermark for JP's photo
    Overall soft for the first, soft and blurry (especially noticeable on the tail) for the second.

  11. #2051
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Hunter Valley
    Posts
    5

    Default

    please advise if this would classify as a acceptable nose photo

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Stinson SR-9E VH-ISR.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	692.6 KB 
ID:	7384

    Cheers

  12. #2052
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cluckemsworth View Post
    please advise if this would classify as a acceptable nose photo

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Stinson SR-9E VH-ISR.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	692.6 KB 
ID:	7384

    Cheers
    Hi,

    This would be rejected for 'Cut Off' (poor crop). Sorry.

  13. #2053

    Default

    ....
    Last edited by Alex - Spot-This !; 03-22-2017 at 12:48 PM.

  14. #2054

  15. #2055
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    141

    Default

    Hi,

    Any suggestions on these three?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	04-4133.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	551.0 KB 
ID:	7388 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N739MA.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	791.7 KB 
ID:	7389 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	99-0166_5.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1,008.0 KB 
ID:	7390

    thanks

  16. #2056
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pawelm View Post
    Hi,

    Any suggestions on these three?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	04-4133.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	551.0 KB 
ID:	7388 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N739MA.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	791.7 KB 
ID:	7389 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	99-0166_5.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1,008.0 KB 
ID:	7390

    thanks
    #1: would be ok for me
    #2: maybe a tad dark
    #3: would be ok for me

  17. #2057
    JPElite Member! TomEPKK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Krakow/Geneva
    Posts
    127

    Default

    #2: whole bottom of the plane (dark blue) is very noisy - you can see almost red cast...

  18. #2058
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    141

    Default

    Yeah, I've noticed that on my other monitor and deleted it from queue. Different shot already uploaded

    Dzieki

  19. #2059
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Is this ok?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RA-76503(2).jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	679.9 KB 
ID:	7391

    Thanks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •