Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View PostHello, thanks for the help.
Which of the two is the best?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9088[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9096[/ATTACH]
Can i also ask your opinion about this one?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9089[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post1. soft
2. soft
3. soft, contrast, cut off, overexposed, backlit
4. soft, cut off, obstruction, horizon, centering
Quality looks ok to me, but the crop on the first might be an issue. We generally don't like it when the stabilizer is cut off like that.
Still likely a contrast/dark rejection.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post1. soft
2. soft
3. soft, contrast, cut off, overexposed, backlit
4. soft, cut off, obstruction, horizon, centering
About number #1, see it`s ok now. Thanks dlowwa!
another one that I did some corrections after JP team comments
need some comments in this shots too
This kind of shot is acceptable?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View PostHello screeners can you give your opinion about these ones please. Thanks.
Originally posted by vcruvinel View PostAbout number #1, see it`s ok now. Thanks dlowwa!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9119[/ATTACH]
another one that I did some corrections after JP team comments
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9120[/ATTACH]
need some comments in this shots too
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9121[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9122[/ATTACH]
This kind of shot is acceptable?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9130[/ATTACH]
2. ok
3. a little too low in frame and needs CW rotation
4. soft tail, also needs CW
5. close crops of engines are ok, but this one has some obstruction and is very soft
Comment
-
Originally posted by Degupukas View PostHello team JP could please prescreen
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9123[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9124[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9125[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9126[/ATTACH]
thanks
Originally posted by crisquijano View PostHi again JP team. Please check these. Thank you
[1920px]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9127[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9128[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostThese would be rejected for dark/contrast. The first might have a chance with some brightening and more contrast.
1. some light halos, and starting to look oversharpened in places.
2. ok
3. a little too low in frame and needs CW rotation
4. soft tail, also needs CW
5. close crops of engines are ok, but this one has some obstruction and is very soft
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pta Aviation View PostHi there. Just wanted to know if this pic is acceptable.
Thank you
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9132[/ATTACH]
Originally posted by ninadranade View PostDear Team,
Please let me mow if this shot is passable.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9133[/ATTACH]
Thanks for your time,
Thanks,
Ninad
Comment
-
I forgot to ask prescreen for this two:
Thanks
Shots with some corrections;
About the Sideral:
With my image there is no way to centralize more. Try with this one (after correct the others issues) or not even try?
About the engine shot. I think there is no way to get out the stairs (obstructions). Try to improve the sharpness and upload or save in my personal gallery?
Thanks
Comment
Comment