Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hi guys,

    Is this one acceptable, or still overexposed?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	92-9000.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.20 MB
ID:	1016035

    I also want to apologize the person who screened the previous version of this photo. It was uploaded as hot by accident, it supposed to be a remark, not a reason for "hot" Sorry for wasting your time

    edit:

    And what about these two?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	82-8000.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.54 MB
ID:	1016036 Click image for larger version

Name:	N286UP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1016037

    cheers!

    Comment


    • Hey Guys

      Im not to 100% sure, will this photo rejected due to backlit?
      Click image for larger version

Name:	3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.93 MB
ID:	1016042

      Thank you very much in advance,
      Best Regards!

      Julian S.
      Best Regards from Germany,
      Julian S.​

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
        Hey Guys

        Im not to 100% sure, will this photo rejected due to backlit?
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]7963[/ATTACH]

        Thank you very much in advance,
        Best Regards!

        Julian S.
        Hi,
        yes definitely backlit I'm afraid

        regards
        Alex

        Comment


        • Originally posted by pawelm View Post
          Hi guys,

          Is this one acceptable, or still overexposed?
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]7953[/ATTACH]

          I also want to apologize the person who screened the previous version of this photo. It was uploaded as hot by accident, it supposed to be a remark, not a reason for "hot" Sorry for wasting your time

          edit:

          And what about these two?
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]7954[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]7955[/ATTACH]

          cheers!
          they all look acceptable to me (but the 2 Air Force One are similar so only pick one)

          Regards
          Alex

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
            they all look acceptable to me (but the 2 Air Force One are similar so only pick one)

            Regards
            Alex
            Thanks. Yes, the VC-25 shots are similar, but it's not the same aircraft It's 92-9000 and 82-8000. Yep, we are that lucky, we had them both at once

            cheers

            Comment


            • Hi,

              How would this do?

              Thanks

              Click image for larger version

Name:	7TVJB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	591.4 KB
ID:	1016043

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bluepanda7 View Post
                Hi,

                How would this do?

                Thanks

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]7964[/ATTACH]
                Hi,looks acceptable

                best regards
                Alex

                Comment


                • Hi,
                  is the crop on this one ok?
                  Thank you.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6612.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	781.2 KB
ID:	1016045

                  Comment


                  • Would these be acceptable?
                    Thanks in advance!
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	SU-BPX.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	455.3 KB
ID:	1016046Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EUPH.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	497.9 KB
ID:	1016047
                    https://www.jetphotos.com/photographer/87479

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
                      Hi,
                      is the crop on this one ok?
                      Thank you.

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]7966[/ATTACH]
                      Borderline, but personally I'd either crop it tighter to the tail, or wider so you don't cut the horizontal stabilizer.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by JVSpotter View Post
                        Would these be acceptable?
                        Thanks in advance!
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]7972[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]7973[/ATTACH]
                        Both look like they could use more contrast.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          Borderline, but personally I'd either crop it tighter to the tail, or wider so you don't cut the horizontal stabilizer.
                          There was an issue with the attachment, it cuts something off. I uploaded it to an external hoster, this is how it looks like in real.

                          Comment


                          • Include the horizontal stabiliser.
                            If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !

                            Comment


                            • Curious to see if this would be acceptable, somewhat of an unusual angle. Aircraft not in database also.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	AP C560XL N39FW 001.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	561.4 KB
ID:	1016049

                              Comment


                              • Hi there,
                                I have this shot from early in the morning. The sun had been up just over an hour and was, unfortunately, hiding behind some clouds. Would I need the nightspot category? As always, comments would be gratefully received Click image for larger version

Name:	B-HUR_20170712_PVG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	667.4 KB
ID:	1016050

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X